Page 196 - History of The Quranic Text | Kalamullah.Com
P. 196

176           THE HISTORY OF THE QUR'ANIC TEXT

                                 learned the statement from one another: if C did not learn directly from
                                 B, or if B never came into contact with A, then the chain is clearly defective.
                                 If we do discoveran unbroken chain however,our analysisisnot yet complete.



                                                iii. Supporting or Negating Evidence

                                 The fmal step is a comprehensive cross-examination of other isndds. Suppose
                                 we have another pair of trustworthy scholars, E and F, who also transmit
                                 fromA, such that we have the chain A-E-F. If they convey a statement about
                                 A which matches that of A-B-Cthen this further strengthens our case, called
                                 mutdba'a (~\;..). But what if the two are not congruous? If E and F are of an
                                 even higher calibre than Band C, this weakens the latter's report; in this
                                 case the A-B-Ctransmission is labelled sh&ih (:.u.: aberrant and weak). The
                                 presence of a third or fourth chain complementing A-E-F's version helps
                                 solidify the argument against A-B-C. If scholars E and F are of the same
                                 calibre as Band C however, then A will be cited as mudtanb (y~ :
                                 perplexed). ShouldA-B-C state something which contradicts A-E-Fbut is in
                                 line with hundreds of other reports (from sources other thanA), thenA-E-Fs
                                 account is discarded.



                                               iv. A Test Case with a Misleading Isnad

                                 Very odd stories are occasionally conceived. Lacking a strong knowledge
                                 of chain criticism, numerous scholars (and in rare instances even famous
                                 mu~addithin) bring forward a false report and expend much energy in its
                                 defence or refutation. For example adh-Dhahabi quotes from al-A'rnash,
                                 "I heard (~) Anas b. Malik [an eminent Companion] reciting wu 01
                                 ':JY Y J""'i lkJ...w.i ~J:ll\. When told, '0 Anas, it is ~iJi J, , he replied, '~iJ! and
                                        J
                                 Y J"""\ are the sam"e.'"Adh-Dhahabi claims the chain to be authentic," and
                                 'Abdus-Sabur Shahm, attempting to somehow validate this incident, attributes
                                 Anas' response to the seven a~rzif.28 Yet according to the pioneers of ~adith
                                 criticism al-A'mash never learned anything from Anas, as evidenced by
                                 his following remark:

                                    Anas 1. Malik would pass by me every morning and evening. I used to tell
                                    myself, 'I will never stoop to learning from you Anas, for after serving the
                                    Prophet in his lifetime you approached al-I:Iajjaj for an appointment, till
                                    he agreed to appoint you.' Now I feeldisgraced for I find myself transmitting
                                    information not even through him, but through his students.P


                                   27 Adh-Dhahabi, Tabaqiit al-Qj/rrii', i:85.
                                   28 'Abdus-Sabur Shahin, Tiir'ikh al-Qj/r'iin, p. 88.
                                   29 See adh-Dhahabi, Tabaqiit al-Qj/rrii', i:84.
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201