Page 41 - Tafsir of surat at tawba repentance
P. 41

© Islamic Online University                                                  Usool at-Tafseer







                       math-hab. He  studied hadeeth  sciences  extensively  and  became  independent  of
                       his  math-hab.  In  his  tafseer,  ash-Shawkaanee  has  combined  both  methods  of
                       tafseer  (by  opinion  and  by  narration).  He  has  condensed  the  hadeeth chains  and
                       has mentioned the books in which each hadeeth may be found, and most opinions
                       are  attributed  to  their  sources.  Grammatical,  legal,  and  philosophical  issues  are
                       discussed and the positions of the great commentators are mentioned. This tafseer
                       is  printed  in  five  volumes  and  is  widely  favored  among  orthodox  scholars.  A
                       recent  edition  has  footnotes that  extensively  document  the hadeeths cited  by  the
                       author. 124


                       10. Tafseer Ibn ‘Abbaas, Tanweer al-Miqbaas min Tafseer Ibn ‘Abbaas
                           This tafseer was  compiled  by  Muhammad  ibn  Ya‘qoob  al-Fayroozaabaadee
                       (d.  1414  CE/817  AH),  who  was  a  Shaafi‘ee  scholar  and  author  of  the  famous
                       Arabic  dictionary,  al-Qaamoos  al-Muheet.  The  vast  majority  of  this  tafseer
                       consists  of  explanatory  statements  attributed to the  great  sahaabee and  mufassir,
                       Ibn  ‘Abbaas.  The  author  mentions  the  chains  of  narrators  for  each  section  of
                       tafseer.  Hence,  this  tafseer  is  considered  as  being  among  the  tafseers  bir-
                       riwaayah.  However,  chains  of  narration  attributed  to  Ibn ‘Abbaas  vary  in  their
                       level  of  authenticity,  depending  upon  the  reliability  of  the  narrators  themselves.
                       Chains  from  Mu‘aawiyah    ibn  Saalih  and  Qays  ibn  Muslim  al-Koofee  are
                       considered saheeh (highly  authentic)  and  those  from  Ibn  Is-haaq  (the  historian)
                       are  considered  hasan  (authentic);  while  those  from  Ismaa‘eel  ibn  ‘Abdur-
                       Rahmaan as-Suddee al-Kabeer and ‘Abdul Maalik ibn Jurayj are doubtful.  Those
                       from  ad-Dahhaak  ibn  Mazaahim  al-Hilaalee,  ‘Ateeyah  al-‘Awfee,  Muqaatil  ibn
                       Sulaymaan al-Azdee, and Muhammad ibn as-Saa’ib al-Kalabee, who was accused
                       of  fabricating  hadeeths, are  all  da‘eef (unacceptable).  Nearly  all  of  the  so-called
                       “Tafseer  of  Ibn  ‘Abbaas”  is  based  on  statements  narrated  in  chains  containing
                       Muhammad ibn as-Saa’ib al-Kalabee. Hence, this tafseer is considered unreliable
                       for  the  most  part;  and,  despite  its  popularity  among  the  masses,  it  is  totally
                       rejected by Muslim scholars. 125
                       TAFSEER BID-DIRAAYAH

                       1. Tafseer Fakhrud-Deen ar-Raazee,  Mafaateeh al-Ghayb

                           Fakhrud-Deen   ibn  ‘Alee  ar-Raazee  (1150-1210  CE/544-606   AH)   was  a
                       Shaafi‘ee scholar who excelled in the grammatical sciences as well as philosophy.

                       124
                          Fat-h al-Qadeer, documentation by Sayyid Ibraaheem (Cairo: Daar al-Hadeeth, n.d.).
                       125
                          See Mabaahith fee ‘Uloom al-Qur’aan, pp. 360-62 and at-Tafseer wa al Mufassiroon, pp. 81-3.




                                         http://www.islamiconlineuniversity.com                    41
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46