Page 177 - test2
P. 177

6.    BOP Recordkeeping


                          30 CFR § 250.450. required lessees to record the time, date and results of
                   all pressure tests, actuation  and inspections of the BOP system in the driller’s
                   report.  The lessee was also required to:

                         Record BOP test pressures on pressure charts;
                         Require onsite representation to sign and date BOP test charts and reports
                          as correct;
                         Document the sequential order of BOP and auxiliary equipment testing
                          and the pressure duration of each test (subsea BOPs record closing times
                          for annular and ram BOPs);
                         Identify the control station and pod used during the test;
                         Identify any problems or irregularities observed during BOP system
                          testing and record actions taken; and
                         Retain all records at the facility for the duration of drilling the well.

                   Additionally, operators had to maintain complete and accurate records of all well
                                                                                             422
                   activities including records of any significant malfunction or problem.

                              K.     Regulatory Improvements

                          At the time of the Macondo blowout, MMS did not have a comprehensive
                   set of regulations specifically addressing deepwater technology, drilling, or well
                   design.  Regulations applicable at that time to both shallow water and deepwater
                   drilling operations were captured in 30 CFR §§ 250.400‐490 (Subpart D).

                          As drilling operations have moved into deeper water, operational issues
                   have become far more complex.  This increased complexity demands appropriate
                   regulatory improvements.  The Panel concluded that the regulations in effect at
                   the time of the Macondo blowout could be strengthened in a number of ways
                   and that regulatory improvements may have decreased the likelihood of the
                   Macondo blowout.

                          The Recommendations section of this Report contains a number of
                   proposed regulatory improvements that the Panel believes would address the
                   following areas: cement barriers in high flow potential wells; negative test
                   procedures; specific cementing requirements; guidance on lock‐down sleeve


                   422  30 CFR § 250.466.


                                                            172
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182