Page 23 - GeoPRISMS_Newsletter_Spring2019_42_Neat

Integration of GeoPRISMS science results
from various disciplines

Discussion related to the integration of GeoPRISMS science results was lively
and enthusiastic. Overall the value of integrative projects was emphasized.
Discussion centered around two main topics, the process of integrating
results, and outcomes. Most discussion focused on the need for workshops.
Rationale for both geographically focused and topically focused workshops
were recognized. There was acknowledgment that GeoPRISMS has collected
an impressive combination of data sets at each Primary Site and that one good
way to integrate and synthesize these results, thereby capitalizing on the focus
site approach, would be through site specific workshops. Key goals of these
workshops could be to present preliminary results by addressing what data
we have, what we have learned, and what data gaps remain. These workshops
would also provide opportunities for scientists working at the same focus sites
to connect across different experiments and learn from other perspectives.
Because funding for each focus site was phased, the focus site workshops
might be similarly phased. A nested approach was also suggested with each
focus site having their own workshop and then a combined workshop for
SCD and RIE focus sites.
Some common themes that emerged from discussions of topical workshops
included the water and carbon cycle in the solid Earth, fluid transport and
volatiles, interpretation of seismic attributes, deformation at plate boundaries,
the impact of structural inheritance on tectonics, and rock physics. Important
themes for each of these topical discussions would be strategies for spatial
and temporal integration. Topical workshops have the potential of integrating
a lot of knowledge across a range of disciplines.
Discussion of outcomes focused on educational material at all levels, K to
graduate school. At the K-12 level, publically available websites and other
educational materials synthesizing results are recognized as a need. At higher
educational levels discussions about the relative advantages and pitfalls of
developing textbooks versus so-called ‘living’ documents that are updated
frequently, such as Wikipedia, were discussed. Thematic journal collections,
in which papers on a topic are compiled in a single source but published
promptly when they are ready, offer the advantages of a well-organized
volume, but with a short lead time for publication. The merit of animations as
an educational tool and the benefits of taped lectures in facilitating classroom
discussions were also considered.

Participants discussed the importance of accessible and citable data and
samples, crucial to future work. These data sets can be used for multiple
applications and purposes. Access to processed data was also highlighted.
Steps necessary for synthesis of GeoPRISMS

Synthesis of the GeoPRISMS program requires the analysis of data, and the
organization of these analyses into a framework of internally-consistent
interpretations. This type of synthesis is beyond the scope of any PI or even a
small group of PIs. Indeed, the breadth of disciplines involved in GeoPRISMS Poster sessions and break out groups organized
research necessitates a careful, inclusive, and iterative approach. In addition, the throughout the meeting allowed the attendees to
discuss and articulate the community needs for
staged funding approach for the five primary sites has helped the community integration, synthesis and legacy of the GeoPRISMS
organize field projects, but it also means that the science results in Cascadia program. Photos credit: Anaïs Ferot.
and the Aleutians are more mature than in the EARS and New Zealand, where
data acquisition is just ending. The goals of the RIE and SCD Initiatives can
only be met by combining the outcomes of all these primary sites.

Spring 2019 Issue No. 42 GeoPRISMS Newsletter • 23