Page 65 - Forbes India (December 2015)
P. 65

area as an investment in the 1970s.   three other allegations—including   that is being tracked by Nasa. The
           Over the next decade, he picked   one challenging the agreement’s   court ordered the state last year to
           up tens of thousands more acres.   constitutionality. The case is now   conduct an environmental review
           When a six-year drought started in   being tried in Sacramento’s Third   by mid-2016 that could result in
           1987 and cost local farmers $800   District Court of Appeal. “We’re   new limits placed on pumping.
           million, he had much less skin in   warriors out here trying to make   In the second suit brought on
           the game. Still he took note, quickly   sure that a bunch of fat cats don’t   by those two water districts and
           realising that the contracts he had   suck this state dry,” says Adam Keats,   two others, Kern Water Bank
           with the state, which delivered water   chief lawyer for the opposition, who   leaders agreed under a settlement
           from the California Aqueduct—a    adds that the Resnicks’ lawyers have   to assess damages and, if necessary,
           444-mile-long channel flowing with   “a level of rabidness in protecting   compensate the affected landowners.
           runoff from the snow-capped Sierra   their fortunes. They are fiercely   The Resnicks are already looking
           Nevada mountains—were vulnerable   defending that golden goose”.    to secure additional water sources.
           when water was scarce and the state   Neighbouring water districts to   The couple could score big if a $15
           couldn’t meet everyone’s needs.   Kern Water Bank filed two complaints   billion water project championed by
             In what some critics have called   in 2010 when farmers’ wells began   Governor Jerry Brown is officially
           secret meetings, some of his most   drying up. In one, Rosedale-Rio   approved in the next few years.
           trusted advisors met with leaders from   Bravo and Buena Vista alleged that   At least two Wonderful farming
           southern California water districts   the water bank was pumping at   executives are involved in a grassroots
           and state water officials, helping   “dangerous and unacceptable levels”.   push for the project, now called
           broker a sweetheart deal in 1994. Two   Water levels dropped further as the   California WaterFix, which would
           decades later, it still gives the Resnicks   drought raged on. An analysis of   carry water from the Sacramento
           nearly  unrivalled access to water.   three decades of water-level records   River Delta through two 30-mile-long
             Wonderful  denies the meetings were   obtained by Forbes shows that the   tunnels to San Joaquin Valley farms.
           done clandestinely, alleging that those   Kern Water Bank members have   There’s another cushion they’ve
           who say so have an “axe to grind”.   consistently pumped far more than   been building for decades. They have
           The upshot of that meeting: California   their neighbours. Because California   invested $100 million in technology
           handed over public land and an    was the last state in the West to   initiatives designed to help manage
             underground aquifer (former  farmland   start placing limits on groundwater   water shortages and high utility costs;
           and oilfields that had the potential   pumping, with legislation passed   their water expenses, which tripled
           to store about 500 billion gallons of   just last year and taking effect only   in the past 15 years, account for 40
           water) to five public water districts   by 2020, it was legal, if not ethical.   percent of their agricultural costs.
           and the Resnicks’ Westside Mutual   There was also an allegation that the   “There’s no bigger incentive. We have
           Water Co. The new owners agreed   pumping may have caused land to sink   a very aggressive R&D programme,”
           to forfeit state water contracts. They   in the Central Valley, a phenomenon   Stewart says. In addition to drip
           then installed a six-mile-long canal                                irrigation systems now used on all
           and 85 wells at a cost of $50 million.                              their farms, they have spent $22
           Forbes estimates that the  Resnicks’                                million on solar energy networks and
           57 percent stake in the storage facility                            $41 million on fuel-cell research and
           is worth at least $250 million.                                     implementation to power their plants
             But their ownership has been                                      and facilities more cost effectively. A
           under siege, challenged in court nearly                             new research project is also about to
           continuously for the past two decades.                              roll out “supertrees” cultivated to yield
           In 2010, the Center for Biological                                  more with a regular tree’s amount of
           Diversity, a nationwide environmental                               water, which could even be sold to
           non-profit group based in Arizona, and                              rival farmers. Whatever the future
           several other groups sued the bank                                  brings, it would probably be a mistake
           and its members, including Westside                                 to bet against the power couple.
           and the Res nicks’ parent company. A                                    “You have to be an optimist
           Sacramento County Superior Court                                    to be a farmer. Fortunately,
           judge ruled last year that the state                                with our  management team, we
           gave up the water resources without                                 have some optimists and some
           properly analysing the potential   An FTC commissioner rules your ads are   pessimists,” Stewart says. And, of   nEwSCOm
           environmental impacts but dismissed   misleading? Game on: Quote him!  course, some  opportunists.



                                                                                    DECEMBER 11, 2015   FORBES INDIA  |  65
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70