Page 42 - All About History - Issue 11-14
P. 42

What if…



                    Germany had






                             won WWI?









                                                   WORLD WAR I, 1914-1918



                                                       Written by Jonathan O’Callaghan






                                What would have happened if Germany had won World   Without a German defeat, is there any chance of
         STEPHEN BADSEY         War I?                                         someone like Hitler still rising to power?
                  Stephen Badsey   It depends on when they win it. If they win a short war in   The short answer is yes. Mussolini came to power in Italy and
                  is a professor
                  of Conflict   1914, with the Schlieffen Plan [the plan to quickly defeat   Italy was on the winning side in World War I. The Treaty of
                  Studies at the   the French first to avoid fighting on two fronts] working, it’s   Versailles was [Hitler’s] excuse, no reputable historians believe
                  University of   different than if they win a negotiated victory after a long,   that World War II leads inevitably from World War I. The idea
                  Wolverhampton.
         An internationally recognised   hard fight at the end of 1916 or early in 1917, which is the   that a botched peace treaty in 1919 inevitably leads to World
         military historian, he has   other possibility. Either way, you get a large German Empire   War II is not historically accurate.
         written or edited more than
         90 books and articles, his   dominating central and western Europe. What is likely to
         writings have been translated   happen is you get a very strong and dominant Germany,   What might a victorious German Empire have looked
         into five languages and   [but one] that is not quite as bad as Hitler’s Germany in two   like in practice?
         he appears frequently on
         television and in other media.  respects. One is that it doesn’t have a plan for the genocide   Again, it depends on when it happens. At the start of the war
                                of the Jewish population of Europe – at least we don’t think it   in 1914, the Germans have no real concept of any war aims
                                would have – and it doesn’t have a plan for global domination.   except reaching the enemy capital, which had been their
                                With those two exceptions, you get a very nasty, racist,   experience in the Franco-Prussian War from 1870 to 1871,
                                expansionist state with enough power in terms of economic   for example. When that fails in September 1914, they realise
                                and political power to dominate Europe, which means it can   they’re going to need some war aims so they come up with
                                do something no power had ever been able to do: it can afford   something called the ‘Septemberprogramm’. This is a plan for
                                to have an extremely large and extremely good army, and it   a domination of Belgium as a client state, the Netherlands,
                                can also afford to have an extremely good navy, large enough   which is neutral, the annexation of large parts of northern
                                to defeat the Royal Navy. They don’t actually have to invade   France with its industry, an absorption of parts of the Austro-
                                Britain, although they probably would, but they can just starve   Hungarian Empire and the establishment of a German frontier
                                it into submission.                            further to the East. All of this would produce a German-
                                                                               dominated super-state that would reach roughly from Calais to
                                Would this have led to another war?            as far east as Kiev.
                                If Germany wins World War I, they get into a strong position
                                [against the rest of Europe] and then there’s almost certainly a   Could Germany have won the war with the entrance of
                                war about ten years later, in which the British are defeated. So   the United States?
                                the British have absolutely no motive for letting this happen.   As it happened, the Germans made the conscious decision
                                In 1914, the British have three things that nobody else on the   instead to try to go for another total win by introducing
                                planet has got: they’ve got the world’s only global empire with   unrestricted submarine warfare in January to February 1917 in
                                massive resources, they’ve got dominant control of the world’s   an attempt to starve the British out and that was the principal
                                financial systems through London and they’ve got the biggest   decision that brought the US into the war. Once the US is in
                                and most powerful navy in the world. So, why should they sit   the war as well, it’s difficult for the Germans to come up with
                                there doing nothing while a country that will almost certainly   any kind of win; they make a last attempt with their spring
                                defeat them in the next war ten years on establishes that   offensives after the collapse of Russia, in spring 1918, but these
                                position [to leapfrog them]?                   do not succeed.
     42
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47