Page 24 - pd282-May20-mag-web_Neat
P. 24

coVeR


























































        “We have seen an increased aware-  nitely impact prices. But the WA projects   a  reminder  to  the  WA  potash  hopefuls
       ness around ESG issues in the Mannhe-  all claim to be at the bottom of the cost   that they are not alone in recognising the
       im process space,” he said. “It is viewed   curve, particularly in comparison to the   growth potential of fertilisers. A string of
       as environmentally unfriendly and cus-  Mannheim producers so there is some   other potash projects are being devel-
       tomers are looking for alternatives.”  inbuilt protection for the WA producers.  oped  around  the  world,  including  ASX-
        Cost structures are also a major con-  “I don’t think it will be truly disruptive   listed juniors in Europe and Africa.
       sideration, according to Swiericzuk.   and  displace  the  Mannheim  production   In Spain, Highfield Resources Ltd ex-
        “There is essentially a bifurcation of   because  the  market  will be  there  for   pects  to  receive  final  permitting  for  its
       the  cost  curve;  a  complete separation   both.”                       500,000  tpa  Muga  MoP  project  by  the
       between primary and secondary produc-  Investors  are  backing  this  prediction.   end of the year. Meanwhile in Germany,
       tion,” he said.                     Salt Lake’s $US165 million debt facility   Davenport Resources Ltd has ambitious
        While more than 50% of the Mannheim   with  Taurus  Funds  Management,  final-  plans for its 5.3nt resources at South
       producers are loss-making at $US410/t,   ised in late 2019,  was the strongest in-  Harz  project  including  MoP,  SoP  and
       the WA juniors are all pitching projects   dication  to  date  international  financiers   magnesium sulphate.
       within the bottom cost quartile of global   were eager to enter the potash market.   In Africa, Kore Potash is taking on the
       SoP  production.  Salt  Lake’s  DFS  esti-  Danakali also secured financing with the   sizeable  2.2  mtpa  Sintoukola  MoP  pro-
       mated a C1 cash cost of $US205/t, Ag-  African Development Corporation for its   ject in Republic of Congo while the most
       rimin’s $US222/t, Reward’s $US335/t   Colluli project before Christmas then, in   advanced of the international juniors is
       and Australian Potash’s $US262/t.   January, Anglo American plc announced   Danakali, which is developing the Col-
        Eidne said cost advantages would be   a £405 million takeover of troubled Sirius   luli project in Eritrea. Unlike the solar
       vital in the WA potash juniors establish-  Minerals and its Woodsmith polyhalite   evaporation plays in WA, Danakali will
       ing themselves in the SoP market.   project in North Yorkshire.          mine  solid  salts,  lowering  its  cost  base
        “There is a valid concern in any grow-  Woodsmith is set to produce a special-  still further.
       ing sector about how new product could   ty SoP product, POLY4, which currently   The challenge for all the internation-
       be absorbed,” he said. “If the WA sector   boasts a market of just 200,000 tpa.  ally  focused  potash  developers  will  be
       suddenly  brings  on  1  mtpa  it  will  defi-  Anglo’s  purchase  of  Woodsmith  was   matching the WA’s investment profile.



       Page 24   MaY 2020   aUSTRaLIa’S PaYDIRT
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29