Page 38 - ATR 2 2013
P. 38

revealing results





              Hair	testing	proves	better	detector	of	drug	abuse

















                       by callie hoyt
                       Contributing	Writer

                 A 2007 study conducted by the
              state of Oregon estimated that 10 per-
              cent of truck drivers abuse drugs. With
              approximately 3 million truck drivers in
              the United States, that 10 percent is not
              exactly a reassuring figure when driv-
              ing alongside an 80,000-pound tractor
              trailer. With Oregon’s estimate in mind,
              the underlying problem remains that
              there really is no way of determining
              how big the problem actually is.
                 Drug abuse amongst commercial
              truck drivers imposes serious public
              safety risks and concerns. Since 1989,
              the United States government has
              required trucking companies to con-
              duct drug and alcohol surveillance of
              truck drivers through pre-employment,
              random, post-accident and reasonable-
              cause drug testing. The Department of
              Transportation (DOT) is responsible
              for adopting the workplace drug testing   within the trucking industry have rec-  first major carrier to adopt hair test-
              protocols and threshold levels desig-  ognized the safety-critical deficiencies   ing in its pre-employment screening.
              nated by the Department of Health and   and made strides to overcome them.  Greer Woodruff, senior vice president
              Human Services (HHS).                 For years, Lowell, Arkansas-based   of Safety and Security at J.B. Hunt,
                 HHS only designates procedures   J.B. Hunt has reported annual post-acci-  explains that the company turned to
              and standards for the testing of urine,   dent positive result percentages around   hair tests because they are collected
              leaving urinalysis as the only option   3 percent. Despite the company’s best   directly by a collector so the specimen
              to fulfill DOT drug screening require-  efforts to decrease this percentage, it   can’t be tampered with and hair has
              ments. While there are advantages to   had remained relatively stagnate. But in   a longer detection period so a person
              urinalysis in detection of immediate   2005, a pair of tragic accidents in which   could not simply stop using drugs for a
              drug use, there are also many disad-  Hunt drivers failed a post-accident drug   few days to beat the test.
              vantages. The federal government has   test but had previously tested negative   “By keeping drug users out of our
              either failed to see or ignored altogether   for DOT pre-employment urine tests,   company using pre-employment hair
              that DOT drug testing regulations are   necessitated a dramatic change.  tests, our DOT urine positive rate on
              in need of improvement. But leaders   In May 2006, J.B. Hunt became the   random tests dropped by 80 percent

        38                                                                            arkansas Trucking rePorT | issue 2 2013
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43