Page 41 - ATR 2 2013
P. 41

While a hair test runs around $90   test positive for drug use by a factor of   screening method. Both urine and hair
        per test in comparison to the $45 price   three, trucking companies should have   testing have an optimum application to
        tag of a urinalysis exam, company-wide   the option to utilize the strongest drug   certain testing objectives. As Heavener
        hair testing programs inflict a steep,   use detection tools, and these tools   puts it, “urinalysis reveals an event with
        but necessary, financial commitment.   ought to be recognized by the federal   drug abuse, and hair reveals a relation-
        Maverick’s Vice President of Safety and   government. Many trucking companies   ship.” Both methods have a place in
        Training, Dean Newell, asserts that if   that are interested in hair testing will   the overall scope of complementary
        carriers were afforded the option to   not use it until it is accepted by DOT   testing, which ought to be reflected in
        use hair testing in lieu of urinalysis,   primarily due to the cost of duplicative   federal requirements. DOT must enable
        resources previously spent on duplica-  testing.                      a system that allows carriers the best
        tive testing could be redirected towards   Unfortunately, as Andy Heavener   possible options and combinations of
        safety and productivity improvement   with MedDirect, a national third party   specimen type testing to better identify
        measures such as investing in addition-  administrator, points out “federal pro-  drug users.
        al safety technologies on trucks, sleep   grams have simply not advanced in a   The Trucking Alliance, a coalition
        apnea testing, physical ability testing or   broader approach to hair testing. With   of trucking companies that support
        hiring more drivers.               the DOT it’s no longer a question of   safety initiatives, is currently encourag-
            There is seldom a one-size-fits-all   being out of step with what’s available   ing Congress to enact legislation that
        solution when it comes to the truck-  for drug testing methodology, but it’s   would require DOT to immediately
        ing industry, and in such an impera-  time to determine how antiquated cer-  accept hair as an approved alternative
        tive case as screening truck drivers for   tain polices actually are.”   specimen to screen truck drivers for
        drug abuse, federal regulations ought to   Pertaining to eliminating drug   drug use. This legislation would provide
        incorporate the best available technolo-  use among truck drivers, there are sig-  trucking companies with the option to
        gies that achieve the intended objective.   nificant safety dangers that can and   use hair testing in lieu of urinalysis for
        As it is particularly crucial to identify   have resulted by federal agencies limit-  the purposes of pre-employment and
        drug users at the pre-employment stage   ing the availability and application of   random drug screening.
        where applicants are more likely to   a scientifically proven superior drug



        ROUNDTABLE,
        Continued from page 37                                      “i hate tolls.”

            Carman continued, “To put it in a            —coNgressmaN tim griffiN (r-ark.)
        real-life example, with the way things
        are, they have to wake up in the middle
        of the night and start driving because   to raise a hand if you support a 10-cent   way is because the toll idea won’t go
        the rules are inflexible.”         fuel tax. Everyone raised their hand.   away. But there might be some politi-
                                           I asked, ‘how about 20 cents? Thirty   cal cover emerging as states are passing
        HIGHway fUNdING                    cents? I got to 50 cents before anyone   fuel taxes. We want a national highway
            With a member of the House Ways   lowered their hand. Tolls exist as a con-  system that’s supported by national
        and Means Committee in attendance,   cept because our leaders don’t have to   money—we don’t want to cross over to
        it would be strange if the conversation   take the political heat for it like they do   Tennessee and wonder what we’re going
        didn’t turn to finances.           with fuel taxes.”                  to find.”
            Summarizing the group’s senti-     Shuster was quick to dismiss that   Again, Shuster encouraged the
        ments, Griffin said it best, “I hate tolls.”  notion. “In Pennsylvania, we did it   group to share their opinions—with
            Williams underlined the indus-  all—we were trying to lease the turn-  legislators and the public. “I need your
        try’s willingness to support a diesel tax   pike, raise the fuel tax, toll I-80 all the   help advocating not only to the folks in
        increase.                          way across,” Shuster said. “The biggest   Arkansas; but to go out across America
            “In 2006, I was at an American   outcry came from the places they were   and get the highways that move goods
        Trucking Associations executive com-  going to put a toll.”           and people funded properly,” Shuster
        mittee meeting and I was looking at a   Citing a recent number of state   said. “You can talk to Tim and me right
        table full of Republicans. I asked them,   fuel tax increases, Williams conceded   now, but it’s going to take a larger effort
        do you want tolls and they said ‘hell   pro-toll, anti-tax politics could be on   to build these roads in the next 15
        no, we don’t want tolls!’ I asked them   their way out. “The reason I put it that   years.”

        arkansas Trucking rePorT | issue 2 2013	                                                                  41
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46