Page 23 - ATR 6 2013 digital
P. 23

possible, according to Bendix’s Thomas.   front, ‘It will give you a margin of safe-  able. Therefore, we believe these systems
        Instead, Bendix has been making incre-  ty, but the driver still should drive safe-  help shape and develop preferred driv-
        mental advances in the hardware and   ly, observing good driving practices.’”  ing behaviors, making drivers more
        software since it introduced its first   Joe Oleson, senior manager of   conscious about safety,” Oleson said.
        radar product in 2009 and then added   maintenance administration for FedEx   CalArk’s Hare said her company’s
        braking in 2011. Carriers, he said, have   Freight, said some crash mitigation   drivers are trained on the equipment
        done a good job of communicating their   technology is now standard in his com-  before they operate it, with an emphasis
        needs. “We are not guessing what fleets   pany. FedEx Freight started using the   placed on the system’s limitations. “We
        want,” he said. “We have very good   Vorad system, an alert-only system once   really stress that the driver is still in
        dialogue with them. From there we   owned by Eaton but now supported   control of the vehicle,” she said. “It is
        prioritize and bring the most important   by Bendix, in 2003 and now uses that   not a system that they can just put on
        features to market relatively quickly.”  legacy system along with the Wingman   cruise, lay back and take a nap, and the
            But even the newest technology   and OnGuard systems.             system will go.”
        has its limits. Ultimately, drivers are in   Is there a danger that drivers will   Drivers, she said, have reacted posi-
        control, and it’s up to them to operate   become too reliant on the systems and   tively to the tool, and it has changed
        their trucks safely. Collision mitigation   become less careful? Oleson says no.   their behavior knowing the data stream
        systems can’t completely compensate   While passenger car systems such as   being sent to the carrier will hold them
        when drivers drive too fast or too close.   those assisting with cornering can help   more accountable for near-misses and
        “What these systems do is reduce the   drivers drive more recklessly, motor car-  non-events. “When they know that
        likelihood of an accident. They assist   rier drivers don’t want these systems   data’s available, it changes their outlook
        the driver, but really the driver still   to activate. They’re based on improving   a little bit,” she said.
        remains in full control of the vehicle,”   safety, not performance.       Maverick’s Newell said his drivers
        said Meritor WABCO’s Korn.             “Most system interactions – wheth-  were already accustomed to the passive
            “The laws of physics exist,” Bendix’s   er passive (such as an audible alarm) or   technology, so adding braking hasn’t
        Thomas said, “so we tell the drivers and   active (such as active system de-throttle   been that big of an adjustment. Drivers
        the technicians and management up   or braking) – are not meant to be enjoy-                        34




                                                           Most trucking companies
                                                           make (or lose) more

                                                           money on equipment than
                                                           they do hauling freight.





















                                                                                                    TRANSPORT ENTERPRISE LEASING LLC.










        arkaNsas TruckiNg reporT | issue 6 2013                                                                   23
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28