Page 191 - English for Writing Research Papers
P. 191

175

              S1–S5 give the reader no space to choose another possible interpretation. Such

            claims are very strong when used in reference to your own findings, but may be fi ne
            when talking about the literature.

              Softer versions of S1–S5 are in S6–S10, respectively.

                S6.    This factor  may be  /  is probably  responsible for the increase in…
                S7.    These results  would seem to show  /  indicate  /  suggest  the importance of…
               S8.    These fi ndings  provide some evidence  /  appear to prove  that x = y.
                S9.    This problem  tends  /  seems  /  appears  to manifest itself in…
                S10.  It seems  likely  /  probable  /  possible  that x = y.

             S7–S9 make use of two verbs, the fi rst ( seem, appear, tends ) reduces the power of
            the second ( show, prove, manifest ). Other useful verbs with a similar function are:
              help, contribute, have a tendency , and  be inclined.



            10.5      Toning down adjectives and adverbs


              Some adjectives and adverbs have a very strong tone. Here are some examples:

               innovation:  innovative, novel, cutting edge, seminal, pivotal
               importance:  extremely important, very signifi cant, of central  /  vital  /  fundamental importance

                certainty:  clear(ly), obvious(ly), evident(ly), conclusive(ly), definite(ly), undeniable, undeni-

              ably, undoubtedly
             When you are referring to your own work, you need to be careful how you use the
            above adjectives and adverbs. You might risk being accused of being too sure of
            yourself. For example:

               S1.  *This  pivotal  approach is  particularly interesting  for physicians.

              The adjective  pivotal  describes something that is of vital or central importance.
            An expression such as  this pivotal approach  (S1) makes the author sound rather
            arrogant, since it is he or she who is assessing his / her own work. Such an
            expression, however, would be totally acceptable if the author were using it in a
            review of someone else’s approach. S1 also states that the author’s approach will
            be  particularly interesting  for doctors, but perhaps the author should let the doc-
            tors decide for themselves how interesting the approach is. It would be more
            acceptable to write:
                S2.  Our approach would lend itself well for use by physicians.
                S3.  We hope that physicians will find our approach useful.
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196