Page 192 - English for Writing Research Papers
P. 192

176

              S2 is more modest. It does not explicitly state the importance of the approach and
            the conditional  would  makes the claim more tentative. S3 is even more modest.

              To protect yourself from accusations that you are too certain about your fi ndings
            you can use adverbs and adverbial phrases such as  somewhat, to a certain extent,
            relatively , and  essentially  as well as adverbs of probability and possibility such as
              probably, likely , and  possibly . For example, both S4 and S5 could be considered
            very strong claims in certain circumstances.

                S4.  X is related to Y.
                S5.  X is certainly related to Y.

              S6 and S7 take a more indirect approach.
                S6.  X is somehow related to Y.
                S7.  X is likely related to Y.

             S6 is a hedge on  how  X is related to Y, whereas S7 is a hedge on the  probability  of
            X being related to Y.


              Other useful adverbs for taking an indirect approach to interpreting the level of

            certainty in your findings are:  apparently, presumably, seemingly .



            10.6   Inserting adverbs to tone down strong claims




              Different adverbs indicate different levels of confidence. If you are talking about
            how visible something is or how easy it is to detect, you could say:
                S1.  X was  clearly  visible.
                S2.  X was  scarcely  detectable.

             S1 and S2 indicate confidence at both extremes of the visibility spectrum. However,

            if you think that there is an element of subjectivity in this visibility you can insert
            another adverb or phrase to reduce the power of the main adverb. So you could say:

                S3.  X was reasonably clearly visible.
                S4.  X was scarcely detectable, at least in our experiments.

              You can use the same techniques to describe the level of agreement, correlation or
            matching.

                S5.  Our data fit perfectly with those of Mkrtchyan.
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197