Page 195 - English for Writing Research Papers
P. 195

179

            her idea. She is saying: “I may be wrong about what I am saying. My research may

            not be sufficiently robust to support this idea – and this is my responsibility. So,
            don’t worry if it contradicts what you think.” By doing this she helps / hopes to
            make her claim more readily acceptable to the community and therefore gain cred-
            ibility in her fi eld.

             Using phrases such as  I argue  is what is known as authorial voice. In many lan-
            guages such a device is not used and it may sound strange, unnatural or even unim-
            portant for you to use it. However, your decision should be based on the style
            permitted in your journal and the expectations of your referees and readers, rather
            than necessarily what would be expected in your own language.

              In S2, the author is perhaps making a claim that is less controversial or already has
            some support in the community. Note that the verb  argue  could be replaced by  sug-
            gest, propose  or  hypothesize .

              Other verbs you could use in this context are:  infer, calculate , and  believe .

              You can also use nouns for the same purpose:

               Our  interpretation  of these results is…
               My  perspective  on these fi ndings is…







            10.9   Saving other authors' faces: put their research
                  in a positive light
              It is fine to question other people’s findings and conclusions. Even the most repu-


            table papers sometimes include poor research. But when you do make criticisms,
            ensure that you  always  do so in a constructive way that still manages to put the
            original research in a positive light. In this way you save the original author’s face,
            i.e. their reputation and position in the academic world.

             Let’s imagine that so far in the literature one hypothesis, H1, has been proposed as
            an explanation for a certain phenomenon  x . You are proposing a different hypothe-
            sis, H2, which completely contradicts H1 and proves it to be wrong. You don’t want
            to be overtly critical of H1, because the referee of your paper could even be the
            person who initially proposed H1, or at least is a big supporter of it. Equally impor-
            tantly, readers will more readily accept your objections if you phrase them in a
            constructive way.
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200