Page 116 - Towards_a_New_Malaysia_The_2018_Election_and_Its_6146371_(z-lib.org)
P. 116

Politics of Reform and the Triumph of Pakatan Harapan        101

                  technocrats in the party. A so-called ‘National Consensus’, or political deal
                  between Hadi and Najib, was apparently known to insiders but did not seem
                  to percolate to the PAS base, which still regarded UMNO as its main rival. 17
                     Charts 5.11 and 5.12 show the extent of PAS victories measured by vote-
                  share, as well as the minimal impact of PH’s Amanah candidates.


                  Rise of Warisan in Sabah

                   e emergence and meteoric success of Parti Warisan Sabah, or Sabah Heritage
                  Party, probably deserves a study of its own. However, this section will su ce
                  to show the importance of its rise in terms of Sabah’s complex multiparty
                  electoral politics. Since I o er no analysis here of Sarawak, which had only
                  a parliamentary contest in 2018, this brief Sabah analysis will illustrate the
                  uniqueness and special circumstances of East Malaysia in electoral politics.
                  Warisan was founded on 17 October 2016 by former UMNO Vice President
                  Sha e Apdal and former PKR politician Ignatius Darell Leiking.  e UMNO
                  crisis brought about by the 1MDB scandal saw the sacking of Sha e Apdal
                  from the party and thus a major weakening of UMNO Sabah. PH leaders
                  were able to cobble together an electoral pact with Warisan on the eve of
                  GE14, ultimately contributing an additional eight members to PH’s majority
                  in Parliament. For Warisan, the pact with PH allowed it to ride on national
                  issues such as the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the 1MDB scandal
                  although, without a doubt, local issues such as Chief Minister Musa Aman’s
                  poor leadership were more crucial in drawing people away from BN.
                     Warisan’s rise was predicated on the long-standing disa ection of the
                  Borneo states with the federal government on matters of states’ rights and
                  autonomy. In Sabah’s case, the ‘20 points’ agreement Sabah inked with
                  the central government  when it joined Malaysia in 1963 remained as an
                                      18
                  undercurrent of politics (Loh 2005; Chin 2018). As in Sarawak, federal–
                  state relations were necessarily anchored on a relationship that allowed for
                  a high degree of autonomy and control by the state governments. UMNO’s
                  presence and domination as a proxy federal party in Sabah led to seething
                  resentment against the central government, but Sabahans, divided by their
                  ethnic diversity, tolerated federal dominance, regardless.  e sacking of
                  Sabahan leader Sha e Apdal by Najib  Razak was  the spark that reignited
                  sentiments of Sabah ‘nationalism’ that impacted greatly on GE14. Coupled
                  with concerns felt across a variety of regional indigenous groups too complex
                  to explicate here, the time seemed ripe for an overturn of BN control in the
                  state. I would consider the Sabah development as yet another critical break






                        This content downloaded from 139.80.253.0 on Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:22:05 UTC
                                   All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121