Page 13 - Looking_after_school
P. 13

Introduction





                Placing the student at the centre of the educational system is a high
                priority of educational policies worldwide. Many countries, as well
                as international organisations, share a particular concern about the
                position of the student in education. This varies from a concern with
                the student’s freedom in the educational system, to their role in school,
                or to their position in the pedagogical process. There are a number
                of different terminologies and descriptions circulating in this context
                which come to mind: differentiation, tailor-made education, custom-
                ised education, appropriate education, personalised education, per-
                sonal learning, individualised approaches, personalised assessment,
                and personal learning pathways, for example. These various terms
                differ in meaning, yet all express a shift of attention towards the stu-
                dent, and imply that contemporary education is not, or at least not
                sufficiently, concerned with the student.
                This shift towards a more central positioning of the student is not
                new. Recall for instance the efforts of reform pedagogy at the end of
                the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century. In line with the adage
                “vom Kinde aus” and the idea of “child-centred education” this reform
                movement debated the educational system of the time and plead for
                new methods and new schools. Reform educators like Parkhurst (Dal-
                ton), Petersen (Jena-plan), Freinet, Montessori and Decroly shared
                the idea that the ‘old school’ inadequately addressed the child, their
                experiences, lifeworld, and potential. The starting point should not be
                the institute, the curriculum, or the teacher, but the student. Similar
                movements appeared in the period after the Second World War. Skin-
                ner’s behaviourist theory (1953) laid the foundation for new learning
                theories, which influenced the development of instructional design.
                This form of instruction - with its well-known or infamous learning
                machines - envisioned a partial automatisation of pedagogy, but also
                an individualisation of the process of instruction. In this context even
                the term ‘personalisation’ arises, such as in Keller’s (1968) Personalised




                                              13
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18