Page 74 - NAVAL SCIENCE 3 TEXTBOOK
P. 74

:"1I L1TARY  I.A\\'   79


          general court-martial consists of a military judge and at least tive   A  ilnding  of any court-martial  that  awards  severe  punish-
          members. Enlisted members may serve on the court if the acclised   ment such as it  bad  conduct discharge  lllust be sent beyond  the
          requests. As with a special court-martial, the accused  may request   officer exercising genernl court-martini jurisdiction to the Office of
          in  writing,  subject  to  the approval  of the military judge, that the   the Judge Adl'ocote Geneml (JAG)  of the NO'T. There,  0  Court of
          case be heard by the military judge alolle.            Military Review consisting of a three-judge appellate review panel
             A general  court-martial has jurisdiction to  try persons sub-  carefully reviews every case in  which an  approved sentence affects
          ject to the UCMJ lor allY offellse  pUllishable by the code. A gell-  ;:1  flag officer. or in  which a sentence imposing the death  penalty,
          eral court-martial m;1)' also try any person who might be subject to   dismissal of an officer. a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge. or
          trial by military tribunal,  including civilians in situations in which   confincment for one year or more has been imposed.
          martial !..,w has been officii1lly declared because of a breakdown of   Above  the  Court  of Military  Review  is a "supreme  court" of
          normal civilian authority.                             military justice, the Court of Military Appeals. This court is COIll-
             Court procedures and responsibilities of the judge and mem-  posed of three civilian judges appointed by the president and con-
          bers of the court and  counsel  arc the same as  in  <1  special  court-  finned by the u.s. Senate. An offender whose conviction has been
          martial.  The principal  difference between the two  is  the greater   upheld by  the Court  of Militory Review hos the  right  to  petition
          severity  of  punishment  possible  in  the  general  court-martial.   the Court of rdilitill")1 Appeals to revicw the case. Such appeals arc
          These  include  all  those  pUllishments authorized  in  the  UC;vl}   not  automatic.  If the petition  is granted, the convicted  person is
          for  the offellses  the accused  is found  to  have  committed. These   entitled  to a lawyer who  will  prepare a brief and argue the case
          include death  (for  desertion  in  time of war. lllutiny, sedition, or   before the court. Civilian counsel may be employed if desired.
          spying), confinement for life, dishonorable discharge, bad conduct
          discharge, dismissal of an officer, and total forfeiture of pay during
                                                                 Civil Jurisdiction
          the remi1ining period of a person's obligated service.
                                                                 Military service does not free a person from the obligation to obey
                                                                 laws  governing the civilian population when  he or she is among
          Review of Courts-Martial
                                                                 thelll.  j\·lilitary personnel are  subject  also  to  civil  courts  when
          J\fter a court-martial  hits been completed, the convening author-  they  arc  within  civil  jurisdiction.  In  general,  offenses  committed
          ity performs i:lll automatic review of each court-martial they con-  by a service  persoll  off base  in  civilian clothes against a civilian,
          v('ne to see that the trial court acted correctly, the accllsed person   or against some element of the  civil government, lack  the  neces-
          was not denied <1l1y rights to which they were entitled, and nny sen-  sary service connection to make them milititry offenses punishable
          tence  adjudged was not  illegal or too  severe.  Recommendations   under the UC\ 'lJ.  Since  there  arc  milny possible  sets of circum-
          from  <l  statT judge advocate or legal officer will  be given as neces-  still1CeS, it is often necessary for a court to make the determination
          sary. After this careful review the convening nuthority may approve   as to whether or not the ofiense was service connected.
          or  disapprove  the  findings  "nd  sentence.  and  change  either or   Examples of civil cases of this type that have occurred include
          both of them. He or she may reduce or suspend the sentence, or   not  paying  personal  debts, wrecking  a borrowed  car. damaging
          change  it  to a different aile  providing the severity of the  pUllish-  furniture in  a hotel, speeding  on  city streets,  assault, and  disor-
          ment is not increased. \Vhen a trial results in an acquittal (finding   derly conduct Ollt of uniform in  a public place. \·Vhile these cases
          of not guilty), the convening authority may not change it, or send   may initially fall  strictly within civilinn jurisdiction, they mny also
          the case back for retrial.                             become involved with  military la\\'o  For instance, suppose a speed-
             Tllis review  process  is similar  to the appeal  in  a civilian  court   ing, drunken, and disorderly charge is filed by the loco I police, ond
          cOllviction, except that in  the military the review is done by higher   the service person is held in jail pending disposition of the case. If
          authority in the chain of command, and is automatic. An appeal of a   that imprisonment extends beyond the time of authorized leave or
          civilian court conviction is made to a higher court ill the system, and   liberty,  the service person is then chorgeable under the UCMJ  for
          will only be granted if reasonnble grounds for olle can be shown.   unauthorized absence.  Additionally,  the person  could  be charged
             In the case of a sUlllmary or special court-martial, the convening   under Article  111  for drunken or reckless  driving and  under the
          authority forwards the  trial record, along wilh  recommendations,   General Article lor bringing discredit upon the Navy.
          to the next superior \\'ith gellernl cOllrt-martial jurisdiction for that   If it service member is held by civil authorities, immediate steps
          officer's review. There, the staff legal officer furnishes a second legal   should be taken to noti ~1 the commanding officer. If the person is
          opinion on the case. The senior may overridc the convening author-  acquitted of the charges, military charges normally will  not be filed
          ity's recommendation if .. 1Il error is fC)llnd, call  tor a retrial, set aside   for  the  period of enforced  absence. If the accllsed  is fOllnd  gui1ty
          in whole or in part findings of guilt and the sentence, or mitigate or   and detained, the entire period of absence is considered as lost time
          slIspend an)' part of an unexecuted portion of the sentence. Again,   for pay purposes, and that period is charged as unexcused absence.
          an acquittal m<l), not be changed, nor any punishment increased.
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79