Page 71 - NAVAL SCIENCE 3 TEXTBOOK
P. 71

76      NAVAL  h:NOWLEDGE


          Initiating and Preferring Charges                      oral or written rebukes to military trials called courts-martial in the
          In  the  Na,'y  the  uSlwl  procedure  for  initiating  and  preferring   more serious Ctlses. The following sections will go into the conduct
          charges  against enlisted  personnel  consists of submitting a writ-  of these disciplintlr)' procedures, including the milkeup and conduct
          ten  report detailing the alleged offense  to the executive officer, or   of military tritlls,  the punishments that Cilll  be awarded  by  them,
          other officer designated by the commanding officer. The forl11  lit i-  and the infractions of the UCMJ that l11il)' lead to such nwards.
          lized is called a Report flllri  Dispositioll of OftellSes Slip.  It (ontains
          tlll  the necessary information to process the case,  including names
                                                                 Disciplinary Actions
          of witnesses. An)1 commissioned officer or petty officer who sees tl
          breach of discipline afloat or ashore Illtly place naval personnel all   There are  two  bilsic classes  of official nnval  disciplinary  action:
          report.  For example, in the case of lateness in  returning to the ship   nonjudicial  punishment,  better  known  as  cnpt(lilJ's  /1/lIst,  and
          rrom libert)"  the officer or the deck would  pbcc the ofte nder on   courts-martial. Captain's  mast, often simply referred to as "mast,"
          report as that person came aboard.                    is i\ name that has come down from earl)' sailing days. At that time,
            The formnl  written  report consists of two  pnJ'ts:  the technical   the  usual setting for nnval justice was on the wcather deck, at the
         charge and the specification(s). The charge tells what artide or the   toot of the ship's mainmilst. Often  the whole crew was tlssembled
         UCMJ the accused  is alleged  to  have  viobted. The specifications   to  hetlr  the  proceedings  ilnd  to  observe  the  punishment,  some-
         set forth  the specific filCts and  circulllstances  involved  with  the   times flogging with a cat-o'-nine-tails.  In  the ~'Iarine Corps, cap-
         violation. The executive officer (XO)  must check the charges and   tain's mast procecdings ilrc referred to as "office hours."
         specifications  to  ensure  they  tlre legally correct.  The  XO  advises   Commanding officers (Ca s)  may impose nonjudicial punish-
         the accused  of all  particulnl's  in  the  Clse,  including the charges,   ment for minor ofiellses upon subordinate officers and enlisted per-
         witnesses,  accuser,  constitution;.\1 rights  under  the  UCI\'I),  and   sonnel. This authority canllot be delegated  unless COs are generals
         rights  concerning  possible  nonjudicial  punishment  (NJP)  or   or flag officers or have  unique senior responsibility in which they
         court-mnltial proceedings.                             exercise general coul't-nlartial jurisdiction. Captain's nlast is the cor-
            After  the executive  officer reviews  the charges, a preliminary   Ilerstone of the ,,,hole structure of Iltlval justice nnd discipline.
         investigation of the charges  is  begun, either by the executive offi-  Military offenses, as distinguished from cOlllmon misdemean-
         cer or by nn  investigating officer he or she appoints.  If the facts in   ors or minor crimes, may be di,'ided into two classes: those involv-
         the case  nre  found  to  warrant disciplinary action, the  investigat-  ing  neglect of duty,  and  those  involving delibernte violations of
         ing officer will  fill  out a charge sheet.  If the investigating ofllcer   instructions, orders, or regulations. Offenses classified as neglect of
         feels  that a court-martial  is not wilrranted, as is the case for  most   duty ma), result in punishment ranging from loss of liberty to Ihnt
         reported  offenses,  the  facts arc reported  to  the  executive  officer,   awarded by a court-martial.  Deliberate violations of instructions,
         tlnd  the  accused is brought  to  nonjudicial punishment  (captain's   orders, or regulatiolls arc  lIsually tried by court-martial.  Such an
         mast) ror the alleged oftense.                         offense is often of concern more tor the defiance of authority it dis-
                                                                plays than lor the consequences of the act itself Offenses involving
                                                                1ll0raltl1l'pitude, such as theft, forgery, 01' seriolls <lcts agilinst oth-
         Preliminary Inquiry                                   ers, invariably result ill tldjudicatioll by court-martial.
         Before taking any kind of disciplin<1I'}' action, it is tllways necessary   Military courts are conducted with the same Ctlre and formnlity
         tlnd wise to  review all  the f..1ctS.  A step somewhnt beyond the pre-  as civiJian courts. Great responsibility rests upon the officers or petty
         liminary investigtltiolliending to a captain's mast is the prelilllinary   officers tlssigned court duties. The court must be conducted with dig-
         in(juily. Essentially, the  inquiry is an  informal  investigation  con-  nity nlld ensure swifi. efficient administration of justice.  Being dealt
        ducted  tor the  purpose of determining whether or not an offense   with fairly and forthrightly in all matters brought before a court is the
        chargeable  under  the  UCMJ hns  been cOlllmitted) and  whether   right of each person accllsed  under the Constitution, the  Uniform
        rensonable grounds exist to support the n!legation that the accused   Code of Military Justice, nnd the JHanu(l/ jor Courts-1Hnrt;nl.
        committed the oficnse. The officer Illilking the preliminary inquiry
        collects nnd examines all  evidence that could bear 0 11  the guilt or
                                                               Nonjudicial Punishment
        innocence of the accused. The officer also looks for facts in mitiga-
        tiOl1  or extcllIU1tioll, that is, circulllstances that might tend to pro-  Prior to a captnin's  mast, the executive officer (XO)  will  normally
        vide some plausible  rensoll  for  the oftense or lessen the  punish-  hold a preliminary mast. Otten called the screening II/list, it is usu-
        ment imposed.                                          ally conducted  tllmost eXilCll}'  like Glptain's mast, except that  the
           If  naval  personnel  are  found  to  have  violated  either  Nm')'   execllti,'e officer's purpose is to  determine  the gravity of the case
        Rcgll/ntiOlls Or the  UCM], they may then be subject to appropriate   nnd  to ascertain  th" facts so  that tlction may be recolllmended to
        disciplinal'}' procedures. Such procedures Gill  I'ange li'om inlormtll   the cOlllmanding ollieer. XOs  may not assign punishment, but  if
                                                               cOllditions justil)',  the}' ma},  dismiss  the  charges, since  Ihey  have
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76