Page 646 - fbkCardioDiabetes_2017
P. 646

622               The Role of Lifestyle Modification in The Prevention of
                                            Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease



              group. In the Chinese Da Qing study, the participants   or  delay  the onset of  T2DM  and consequently its

              had IGT. The subjects were assigned to one of the 4   complications like CVD.
              groups  – Control, Diet only, Exercise  only and Diet
              plus Exercise. The follow-up period was for 6 years.  References:
              The Diet only, Exercise  only and Diet plus  Exercise   1.  International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabete Atlas, 7 ed. Brussels, Bel-
              groups had 31%, 46% and 42% reductions, respective-  gium: International Diabetes Federation, 2015. http://www.diabetesatlas.
              ly, in the risk of developing T2DM.                  org
              The Diabetes Prevention Program  Outcomes  Study   2.  Fox CS. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and
                                                                   the Framingham Heart Study. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2010; 20(3):90-5.
              (DPPOS) was a follow-up of the DPP where the orig-   doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2010.08.001.
              inal metformin group was continued with metformin
              treatment  and  the  original  lifestyle  group  was given   3.  Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Fram-
                                                                   ingham study. JAMA. 1979; 241: 2035-38.
              additional  lifestyle  modification support.  The study
              showed that there was a sustained reduction in the   4.  Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP. Role of diabetes in congestive heart
                                                                   failure: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1974; 34: 29–34.
              incidence of T2DM by 34% in the lifestyle group and
              18%  in the metformin group at the end of 10 years   5.  Brand FN, Abbott  RD, Kannel  WB. Diabetes,  intermittent  claudication,
                                                                   and risk of cardiovascular events. The Framingham Study. Diabetes. 1989;
                                           33
              since randomisation for the DPP.  In the follow-up of   38:504–509.
              the Finnish DPS and the Chinese Da Qing study, 43%
              reduction  at  7 years  and  43%  reduction  at  20  years   6.  Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, De Courten M, Dowse GK, Chitson P, Gareeboo H,
                                                                   et al. Impaired Fasting Glucose or Impaired Glucose Tolerance- What best
              respectively were observed in the incidence of T2DM.  predicts future diabetes in Mauritius? Diabetes Care. 1999; 22: 399-402.
              In the Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme (IDPP),   7.  Moses  A,  Bronson  SC,  Moses  VS.  Pharmacotherapy  for  management  of
              the participants were divided into groups. Group 1 was   prediabetes. In: Madhu SV, editor-in-chief. RSSDI Diabetes Update 2016.
              the control group. Group 2 was given advice on life-  New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers medical publishers (P) Ltd. ; 2017. 375 -77.
              style  modification  (LSM), group  3 was treated with   8.  Tominaga M, Eguchi H, Manaka H, Igarashi K, Kato T, Sekikawa A. Im-
              metformin (MET) and group 4 received both LSM and    paired  Glucose  Tolerance  is  a  risk  factor  for  cardiovascular  disease,  but
                                                                   not Impaired Fasting Glucose  – The Funagata Diabetes  Study. Diabetes
              metformin (LSM+MET). The median follow-up period     Care. 1999; 22:920–924.
              was 30 months.  The  reduction in risk  of diabetes   9.  Perry RC, Baron AD. Impaired Glucose Tolerance. Why is it not a disease?
              was 28.5% in the LSM group, 26.4% in the MET group   Diabetes Care. 1999; 22: 883-885.
              and  28.2%  in the  LSM+MET  group  as compared to
              the control group.   These  reductions are  seemingly   10. Haffner SM, Alexander CM, Cook TJ, Boccuzzi SJ, Musliner TA, Pedersen

                                                                   TR,  et al. Reduced  coronary events  in simvastatin-treated  patients  with
              lesser than those observed in the American, Finnish   coronary  heart  disease  and  diabetes  or  impaired  fasting  glucose  levels:
              and Chinese studies. In the IDPP, the lifestyle advice   subgroup analyses  in the Scandinavian Simvastatin  Survival  Study. Arch
              &  modification  administered  were  less  intense than   Intern Med. 1999; 159:2661-7.
              that given in the DPP and Finnish DPS, and exercise   11. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from
              was not supervised. Further, the relatively lesser risk   coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic
              reduction of T2DM in the Chinese and Indian studies   subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl JMed 1998;
                                                                   339: 229-34.
              when compared to the American and Finnish studies
              may also be reflective of and due to the higher inci-  12. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cho-
                                                                   lesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the national
              dence of T2DM in the population in these countries  .  cholesterol education program (NCEP) Expert panel on detection, evalu-
                                                                   ation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment
              Conclusion:                                          panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285 :2486-97.
              Diabetes affects the  individual,  his family and  the   13. Rana  JS.  Is  Diabetes  really  a  CHD  risk  equivalent.  Expert  Opinion.
              society in terms of physical, emotional, familial, eco-  2016  Apr  13.  American  College  of  Cardiology  website.  Accessed  on
                                                                   2017  Sep  6.  Available  from:  http://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/arti-
              nomical  and  socio-cultural  stress  and  burden. India   cles/2016/04/12/13/40/is-diabetes-really-a-chd-risk-equivalent
              has a higher prevalence of T2DM & IGT and the pop-  14. Rydén L, Grant PJ, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabe-
              ulation is prone to develop dysglycaemia. Hence, as   tes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD:
              for as India is concerned, not only those with predi-  the Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of
              abetes  &  other  high risks  for  developing  diabetes,   the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration
              but  also  the whole population in general  needs  to   with  the  European  Association  for  the  Study  of  Diabetes  (EASD).  Eur
                                                                   Heart J.   2013;  34(39):  3035-87.  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht108. Epub
              be targeted to prevent T2DM and reduce the burden.   2013 Aug 30.
              Therefore,  in such  a scenario, a well  motivated  and
              sustained lifestyle modification will definitely prevent   15. Guess  N.  Lifestyle  issues:  Diet.  In:  Holt  RIG,  Cockram  CS,  Flyvbjerg  A,
                                                                   Goldstein BJ, editors. Textbook of Diabetes. 5  ed. Chichester, West Sus-
                                                                                                th
                                                                   sex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2017. 341-52.


                                                         GCDC 2017
   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651