Page 194 - Psychology of Wounds and Wound Care in Clinical Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 194

Introduction  169

               Introduction


            Optimum outcomes in wound care are only possible with
           effective treatments that are implemented meticulously.
           According to the World Health Organisation, patient con-
           cordance is the ‘single most important modifiable factor that
           compromises treatment outcome’ (WHO   2003 ). Good con-
           cordance can therefore have an important influence in pre-
           venting relapse and optimising health care (Wahl et al.   2005 ).
           In contrast, non-concordance with prescribed treatments has
           implications for the health of the patient, the effective use
           of resources, and the assessment of the clinical effectiveness
           of treatments (Playle and Keeley   1998 ). Indeed, the implica-
           tions for the patient of non-concordance to prescribed treat-
           ment range from an increase of symptoms and deterioration
           of health, through compromised quality of life, to a potential
           risk to life (WHO   2003 ); the potentially serious impact which
           poor concordance can have for a patient with a wound has
           been noted (Hallett et al.   2000 ).
               Up to 80 % of patients can be expected not to comply
           with their treatment at some time (Dunbar-Jacob et al.   1995 ),
           and patients with chronic health problems tend to have the
           highest non-concordance rates for treatment and lifestyle
           changes. This is because risk of poor concordance increases
           with the duration and complexity of treatment regimes, and
           both long duration and complex treatment are characteristic
           of chronic health problems such as wounds. Non-concordance
           rates are thought to average 50 % for long-term health condi-
           tions (WHO   2003 ), with similar figures being reported for a
           range of chronic wound types (e.g. Ertl   1992 ; Erickson et al.
               ;
             1995  Stewart et al.  2000 ).
               It has been suggested that concordance can be either
           intentional or unintentional. However, explanations for non-
           concordance differ depending on the respondent’s viewpoint.
           In a comprehensive review of the literature concerning con-
           cordance in patients with leg ulcers, Van Hecke et al. (  2008 )
           found that nurses focused primarily on patient-related fac-
           tors such as poor motivation, lack of understanding and
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199