Page 563 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 563

530  n  VALIdITy



           instrument be used as a criterion. A true cri-  analysis  and  related  factor  analytic  proce-
           terion is usually a widely accepted standard   dures, such as latent variable modeling. Factor
   V       of the concept of interest. Few of these exist   analysis has become one of the major ways in
           within the areas of interest to nursing.  which nursing researchers examine the con-
              Construct validity has become the central   struct validity of an instrument. It is impor-
           type of validity assessment. It is now thought   tant  to  note  that  this  approach  addresses
           that  construct  validity  really  subsumes  all   only the second aspect of construct validity
           other  forms.  In  essence,  construct  valida-  testing and in itself is insufficient to support
           tion is a creative process that rarely achieves   the validity of an instrument. Factor analysis
           completion.  Instead,  each  piece  of  evidence   simply  provides  evidence  that  the  underly-
           adds to or detracts from the support of con-  ing  factor  structure  of  the  instrument  is  in
           struct validity, which builds with time and   line with the theoretically determined struc-
           use.  Nunnally  (1978)  proposes  three  major   ture of the construct.
           aspects  of  construct  validity:  (a)  specifica-  The third aspect of construct validation
           tion of the domain of observables; (b) extent   provides  an  opportunity  for  more  creative
           to  which  the  observables  tend  to  measure   approaches to testing. Hypotheses proposed
           the  same  concept,  which  provides  a  bridge   have to do with the relationship of the con-
           between internal consistency, reliability, and   cept being measured with other concepts that
           validity;  and  (c)  evidence  of  theoretically   have  established  methods  of  measurement.
           proposed relationships between the measure   These hypotheses deal with convergent and
           and  predicted  patterns.  The  first  aspect  is   discriminate  construct  validity,  subtypes
           similar to content validity and is essentially   that examine the relationship of the concept
           handled through formalized concept clarifi-  under  study  with  similar  and  dissimilar
           cation in instrument development. The inclu-  concepts. If data shows a strong relationship
           sion of this specification of the domain under   with  similar  concepts  and  no  relationship
           construct  validity  supports  the  contention   with  dissimilar  concepts,  evidence  is  built
           that construct validity is the primary form,   for the construct validity of the instrument.
           with other types forming subsets within its   Should  data  not  support  similarities  and
           boundaries.                              differences, several options are possible: (a)
              The other two aspects of construct valid-  the instrument under construction may not
           ity are examined formally through a series   be accurately measuring the concept, (b) the
           of  steps.  These  steps  form  a  hypothesis-  instruments  for  the  other  concepts  may  be
           testing  procedure  in  which  the  hypotheses   faulty,  or  (c)  the  theory  on  which  the  test-
           are based on the theoretical underpinnings   ing was based upon may be inaccurate. The
           of  the  instrument.  Hypotheses  can  relate   multitrait–multimethod matrix has been pro-
           to the internal structure of the items on the   posed as a way to formally test convergent
           instrument. Hypotheses can also refer to the   and discriminate construct validity.
           instrument’s  anticipated  relationship  with   Another  approach  to  examining  the
           other concepts, based on a theoretical formu-  relationship  among  concepts  involves  a
           lation. The first set of hypotheses fall into the   known  group  technique.  In  this  method,
           second  aspect  of  construct  validity  testing;   the researcher hypothesizes that the instru-
           the latter relate to the third aspect.   ment will provide a certain level of data from
              Although  there  are  no  formalized   groups with known levels on the concept the
           ways  to  examine  the  hypothesis  proposed   instrument has been designed to measure.
           for  construct  validity  testing,  some  typical   The  above  approaches  to  testing  con-
           approaches have been identified in nursing   struct  validity  are  only  samples  of  tech-
           research.  Primarily,  the  internal  structure   niques  that  can  be  used.  As  previously
           of  an  instrument  is  tested  through  factor   mentioned,  construct  validity  testing  is
   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568