Page 71 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 71

38  n  CARInG



           nursing  practice  can  result  in  positive  eco-  down. Haldorsdottir’s (1991) research led to a
           nomic  outcomes.  Theoretical  and  empirical   classification of levels of caring relationships
   C       work in caring is expanding. Grand theories   related to a continuum of health or vitality;
           (Boykin and Schoenhofer, 2001; Leininger &   abusive relationships were classified as bio-
           McFarland, 2006; Watson, 2008a, 2008b) and   cidic,  cold  and  detached  as  biostatic,  apa-
           middle-range  theories  (Duffy  &  Hoskins,   thetic  ones  as  biopassive,  benevolence  and
           2003;  Locsin,  2001;  Ray,  1989;  Smith,  2010;   kindness as bioactive, and transpersonal car-
           Swanson,  1991)  are  focused  on  explicating   ing relationships as biogenic or life giving.
           the nature and dynamics of care and caring.  Sherwood’s  (1997)  meta-synthesis  of  16
              Three reviews of the research literature   qualitative  studies  revealed  four  patterns
           on  caring  have  been  published.  Swanson   of  nurse  caring:  interaction,  knowledge,
           (1999)  summarized  and  categorized  the   intentional  response,  and  therapeutic  out-
           research related to caring in nursing science,   comes.  Caring  was  defined  within  content,
           and  Sherwood  (1997)  reported  a  meta-syn-  context, process, and therapeutic or healing
           thesis of the qualitative research on caring.     outcomes.  Two  types  of  caring  knowledge
           Smith  (2004)  reviewed  the  research  related   and skills were identified as person-centered
           to  Watson’s  theory  of  human  caring.  Many   and technical-physical.
           different  designs  and  methods  have  been   Smith  (2004)  reviewed  40  studies  pub-
           used to investigate caring, including descrip-  lished  between  1988  and  2003  that  focused
           tive  qualitative  designs,  surveys,  phenom-  specifically on Watson’s theory of transper-
           enology,  and  quasi-experimental  designs   sonal caring. Four major categories of research
           using standardized scales and physiological   were identified: nature of nurse caring, nurse
           measurement.                             caring behaviors as perceived by clients and
              Swanson (1999) reviewed 130 data-based   nurses, human experiences and caring needs,
           articles, chapters, and books on caring pub-  and evaluating outcomes of caring in nursing
           lished  between  1980  and  1996.  The  studies   practice and education. The largest number
           were categorized into five levels: capacity for   of studies focused on nurse caring behaviors
           caring (characteristics of caring persons), con-  as perceived by clients or nurses. An expand-
           cerns and commitments (beliefs or values that   ing  area  of  research  related  to  evaluating
           underlie  nursing  caring),  conditions  (what   outcomes  of  caring.  Research  supports  that
           affects, enhances, or inhibits the occurrence of   caring-based activities impact mood follow-
           caring), caring actions (what caring means to   ing  miscarriage,  patient  satisfaction,  pain
           nurses and clients and what it looks like), and   and symptom distress in patients with can-
           caring consequences (outcomes of caring). In   cer, well-being, and even blood pressure.
           her  summary  of  30  qualitative  studies  that   Watson’s  (2008a,  2008b)  compendium
           described outcomes of caring and noncaring   of  instruments  to  assess  and  measure  car-
           relationships, Swanson found that outcomes   ing is an important contribution toward the
           of caring for the recipients of care were emo-  advancement of research. This text provides
           tional and spiritual well-being (dignity, self-  background  on  more  than  20  instruments,
           control, and personhood), enhanced healing,   citations  of  work  in  which  they  were  used,
           and  enhanced  relationships.  Consequences   and a copy of them. Some of these tools are as
           of noncaring were humiliation, fear, and feel-  follows: (a) Larson’s CARE-Q to measure per-
           ing out of control, desperate, helpless, alien-  ceptions of nurse caring behavior, (b) Wolf’s
           ated, and vulnerable. nurses who care report   Caring Behaviors Inventory to measure the
           a sense of personal and professional satisfac-  process of caring, (c) Cronin and Harrison’s
           tion  and  fulfillment,  whereas  noncaring  is   Caring  Behavior  Assessment  Tool  and
           related to outcomes of becoming hardened,   Duffy’s Caring Assessment Tool to measure
           oblivious,  depressed,  frightened,  and  worn   patient perceptions of nurse caring behaviors,
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76