Page 1873 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1873

Chapter 108  Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Graft-Versus-Leukemia Responses  1665


            threatening, include adult respiratory distress syndrome, fluid reten-  responses. Data also demonstrated that given sufficient time and a
            tion,  neurologic  toxicity,  cardiac,  renal  and/or  hepatic  failure,  and   low tumor burden, cross-presentation of TAAs and/or alloantigens by
            disseminated  intravascular  coagulation.  Some  of  these,  particularly   professional donor APCs can occur and may promote or sustain GVL
            lung and cardiac dysfunction, can be rapid onset and severe, but are   responses by maintaining or expanding alloreactive T cells after initial
            typically reversible. Neurologic symptoms occurring in the context   priming on host APCs. 91,426  This concept is consistent with clinical
            of CRS are varied and may occur coincident with other symptoms   GVL responses in CML in which the final stage of a GVL response
            of CRS or may arise when the other symptoms of CRS are resolv-  to CML may be the result of donor T cells responding not directly
               414
            ing.  Magnetic resonance imaging often reveals no abnormalities.   to the small number of CML stem cells or progenitors (which would
            IL-6 appears to be the most relevant cytokine in CRS, although likely   be undifferentiated and therefore poor APCs) but to tumor antigens
            not  the  only  cytokine  involved.  CRS  may  also  be  associated  with   cross-presented on professional donor APCs. Emerging data suggest
            findings of macrophage activation syndrome/hemophagocytic lym-  that enhancing such cross-presentation is sufficient to elicit effective
                        414
            phohistiocytosis.   In  addition,  rapid  turnover  of  underlying   GVL  responses  against  acute  or  advanced  leukemia.  These  data,
            leukemia/tumor might lead to tumor lysis syndrome that may coin-  however,  suggest  that  GVL  responses  generated  after  low-intensity
            cide  or  contribute  to  the  severity  of  CRS.  Appropriate  supportive   conditioning may not be as robust as those after full intensity HCT
            care, steroids, and anti–IL-6, tociluzimab remain the current mainstay   and highlight the need for a clearer understanding of the effects of
            for  management  of  CRS.  Furthermore,  whether  CRS  severity  is   the cytokine storm and lymphopenia generated danger signals on the
            dependent  on  the  type  of T  cell  being  engineered  (central  versus   activation of APCs in mediating GVL.
            effector versus naive versus bulk),or the type of vector and/or antigen   Recent  data  showed  that  APC  subsets  could  potentially  be
            being targeted remains unknown.                       modulated to enhance the GVL effect without aggravating GVHD.
                                                                                 +
                                                                  Host-derived CD8α DCs were shown to be required for the induc-
                                                                  tion  of  optimal  GVT  responses  when  Batf3  deficient  mice  were
            Immunobiology of Graft-Versus-Leukemia Responses      used  as  recipients  in  experimental  allo-HCT.  TLR3  stimulation
                                                                                                    109
                                                                                      +
                                                                  via poly I:C in host CD8α DCs, enhanced GVL responses without
            Given the tight association of clinical GVHD and GVL, as well as   exacerbating GVHD. However, cellular processes of regulating GVL
            the  common  biologic  principles  governing  these  responses  after   responses in host APCs still remain unclear. The molecular mecha-
            allogeneic HCT, it is important to discuss the similarities and distinc-  nisms underpinning the role of host APC subsets in GVL are just
            tions  between  them  in  the  context  of  the  three  cellular  phases  of   now being deciphered. It has been observed that absence of Ikaros
            GVHD. 415                                             in host hematopoietic APCs exacerbates GVHD, but without con-
                                                                                                               427
                                                                  comitantly  enhancing  GVT  responses  in  multiple  models.   The
                                                                  role of donor-derived DCs in mediating GVL is also being explored.
            Phase 1: Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells       Initial  reports  regarding  this  association  demonstrated  that  donor
                                                                  APCs are not required for GVL responses, but play an indispens-
            The concept that tumor eradication after allogeneic HCT might not   able role in GVHD in a MHC-matched, MiHA-mismatched BMT
            require toxic chemoradiotherapy and could be achieved primarily by   model.  In  order  to  present  host TSAs,  via  donor  APCs,  to  donor
                                                                      +
            the immunotherapeutic effect from the GVL responses has led to the   CD8 T  cells,  donor  APCs  must  have  the  capacity  for  cross-
            clinical development of nonmyeloablative HCT for hematologic and   presentation  as  they  do  not  express  both  endogenous  alloantigens
                                   416
                                                                          428
            nonhematologic  malignancies.   Phase  1  is  characterized  by  the   and TSAs.   Furthermore,  additional  studies  are  needed  to  deter-
            development of the cytokine storm-generated danger signals from the   mine  which  specific  subsets  of  donor  APCs  play  a  critical  role  in
                                                                                                                    −
                                                            415
            conditioning  regimen  and  the  subsequent  activation  of  APCs.    enhancing  GVT  responses.  Reports  suggest  that  donor  CD11b
            Experimental data suggested that the reduction in conditioning would   APCs  within  the  BM  grafts  consist  mostly  of  pDC  progenitors
            attenuate  the  cytokine  storm,  lead  to  the  development  of  mixed   (pre-pDCs)  and  enhance  the  GVL  activity  of  donor  T  cells  by
            donor-host chimerism, and confine the GVH response primarily to   promoting  differentiation  into  Th1/type  1  CTLs.  Pre-pDCs  also
            secondary lymphoid organs, thus cause less severe GVHD without   regulate  GVH  and  GVT  responses  altering  the  balance  between
            impairing  GVL  responses. 417–419   However,  nonmyeloablative  HCT   donor  Tregs  and  inflammatory  T  cells  by  inducing  indoleamine
            has delayed the kinetics but did not reduce the overall incidence of   2,3-dioxygenase synthesis. 428
            GVHD and a significant number of patients either failed to respond
                    21
            or relapsed.  Furthermore, recent murine and human studies have
            suggested that homeostatic expansion of T cells in a lymphopenic   Phase 2: Donor T-Cell Activation
            environment induced by conditioning (as opposed to mere immuno-
            suppression) improves the antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred   The core of GVL responses, as with GVHD, is also dependent on
            syngeneic or autologous T cells by increasing the availability of space,   the activation of appropriate numbers of T cells. The “second” signals
            enhancing the memory responses, and reducing the competition for   from professional APCs (or certain tumor cells that function as effec-
                                                                                                                  230
            homeostatic cytokines (such as IL-7 and IL-15) for transferred T cells   tive APCs) are critical for generating an effective GVL response.
            while eliminating regulatory T cells. 420–422  Thus low-intensity HCT   Several of the costimulatory pathways that modulate GVHD have
            clearly demonstrates the principle of the GVL effect, but the roles of   also been evaluated in mediating GVL responses. Blockade of CD28
            the cytokine storm and homeostatic expansion of allogeneic T cells in   costimulation  preserved  GVL  responses  but  reduced  GVHD  in
                                                                             429
            shaping the intensity of GVL responses are not known.  murine studies.  However, when the tumor cells also expressed B7
                                                                                                            425
              Host and donor APCs are critical for the induction and severity   molecules,  such  blockade  reduced  the  GVL  responses.   Ex  vivo
                    7
                                                            415
            of GVHD.  Activation of APCs is the key step in phase 1 of GVHD.    blockade  of  CD40-CD40L  interaction  has  been  shown  to  reduce
            Significant progress has been made in understanding the role of APCs   GVHD  by  generating  Tregs  but  still  preserve  GVL.  By  contrast,
                                                                                                                  140
            in GVL. Recent experimental evidence has demonstrated a crucial   blockade of the 4-1BB pathway reduced both GVHD and GVL.
            role for professional host APCs in the induction of GVL responses   The  other  costimulatory  molecules  (OX40  and  ICOS)  and  the
            mediated by donor T cells, even when the tumor cells showed some   inhibitory molecules (CTLA-4 and PD-1) also modulate antitumor
            features  of  APCs. 91,423   Tumors  that  merely  express  costimulatory   responses. 141,142   A  better  understanding  of  the  context  (i.e.,  low
            molecules  may  still  be  unable  to  stimulate  an  effective  immune   intensity or DLI) and the hierarchy of timing, duration, and extent
            response  because  of  their  various  “immunoediting”  processes  that   of costimulatory requirements of donor T-cell subsets might allow for
                                        424
            cause ineffective antigen presentation.  However, when the tumor   balancing the intensity of GVL and GVHD responses. Clinical and
            cell itself functions as a professional APC, as with CML, it can gener-  experimental  evidence  suggest  that  donor T-cell  numbers  correlate
            ate an effective GVL response. 425,426  By contrast, cancers such as acute   with  the  severity  of  GVHD  and  GVL  responses. TCD  grafts  had
            leukemias that seldom differentiate into APCs generate poor GVL   reduced GVHD but increased disease relapse, suggesting a role for
   1868   1869   1870   1871   1872   1873   1874   1875   1876   1877   1878