Page 1875 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1875

Chapter 108  Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Graft-Versus-Leukemia Responses  1667


            It  is  characterized  by  an  acute  (days,  depending  on  the  inducing   Blazar  BR,  Murphy  WJ,  Abedi  M:  Advances  in  graft-versus-host  disease
            agent) and intense inflammatory response wherein the majority of   biology and therapy. Nat Rev Immunol 12(6):443, 2012.
            the infused CAR T cells along with other immune cells such as NK   Choi SW, Braun T, Chang L, et al: Vorinostat plus tacrolimus and mycophe-
            cells, monocyte-macrophages, and dendritic cells become activated   nolate  to  prevent  graft-versus-host  disease  after  related-donor  reduced-
            and  release  inflammatory  cytokines. 449,450   Much  remains  to  be   intensity conditioning allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation:
            understood about the biology of CRS following CAR T-cell therapy.   a phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(1):87, 2014.
            However, it appears that the incidence and severity of the syndrome   Den  Haan  JM,  Sherman  NE,  Blokland  E,  et al:  Identification  of  a  graft
            is greater in patients with large tumor burdens, presumably because   versus host disease-associated human minor histocompatibility antigen.
                                                   414
            of  higher  levels  of T-cell  expansion  and  activation.   However,  as   Science 268:1476, 1995.
            yet,  no  clear  relationship  between  the  cell  infusion  dose  and  the   Dickinson  AM,  Middleton  PG,  Rocha  V,  et al:  Genetic  polymorphisms
            incidence/severity of CRS has been observed. It is associated with a   predicting  the  outcome  of  bone  marrow  transplants.  Br  J  Haematol
            massive proinflammatory cytokine storm with elevated IFN-γ, IL-6,   127:479, 2004.
                                                                                                     +
                                                                                                          +
            TNF-α,  IL-2,  granulocyte-macrophage  colony-stimulating  factor   Edinger  M,  Hoffmann  P,  Ermann  J,  et al:  CD4 CD25   regulatory  T
                   414
            and  IL-5.   Amongst  these  cytokines,  it  appears  that  in  many   cells  preserve  graft-versus-tumor  activity  while  inhibiting  graft-versus-
            instances IL-6 may be the most critical cytokine and its effects are   host  disease  after  bone  marrow  transplantation.  Nat  Med  9:1144,
            likely  from  trans-signaling.  The  source  of  IL-6  and  mechanisms   2003.
            remain unknown. The biology behind the incidence of neurotoxici-  Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, et al: Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-
            ties  remains  unclear.  It  is  also  unknown  whether  CRS  is  required   host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling
            for eventual clinical response and/or if mitigating it blunts response   donors. Transplantation 18:295, 1974.
            rates. Furthermore, whether CRS is reduced when selected T cells   Goulmy E, Schipper R, Pool J, et al: Mismatches of minor histocompatibility
            (central memory subset) are engineered with CARs instead of using   antigens between HLA-identical donors and recipients and the develop-
            bulk  T  cells  remains  an  open  question.  The  relationship  of  CRS   ment of graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation. N
            with the type of vectors or other methodologic aspects also remains   Engl J Med 334:281, 1996.
            unknown.                                              Henden AS, Hill GR: Cytokines in Graft-versus-Host Disease. J Immunol
              Several  other  critical  mechanisms  for  enhancing  the  efficacy  of   194:4604, 2015.
            CAR T cells or for mitigating their toxicities remain to be understood.   Kolb  H,  Mittermuller  J,  Clemm  C,  et al:  Donor  leukocyte  transfusions
            The  data  on  whether  other  targets  (instead  of  CD19)  can  be  as   for  treatment  of  recurrent  chronic  myelogenous  leukemia  in  marrow
            effective remain to be explored. The role of costimulatory domains   transplant patients. Blood 76:2462, 1990.
            in promoting efficacy, toxicity or exhaustion remains largely unknown.   Korngold R, Sprent J: Negative selection of T cells causing lethal graft-versus-
            Recent  experimental  observations  suggest  that  CARs  against  non-  host  disease  across  minor  histocompatibility  barriers.  Role  of  the  H-2
            CD19 targets may be more susceptible to exhaustion and in these   complex. J Exp Med 151:1114, 1980.
            cells CD28 costimulation augments, whereas 4-1BB costimulation   Levine JE, Braun TM, Harris AC, et al: A prognostic score for acute graft-
                                                        451
            reduces,  exhaustion  induced  by  persistent  CAR  signaling.  Thus   versus-host  disease  based  on  biomarkers:  a  multicentre  study.  Lancet
            much remains to be understood with regards to the immunobiology   Haematol 2:e21–e29, 2015.
            of CRS, and CAR T-cell therapy.                       Lindemans  CA,  Calafiore  M,  Mertelsmann  AM,  et al:  Interleukin-22
                                                                    promotes  intestinal-stem-cell-mediated  epithelial  regeneration.  Nature
                                                                    528(7583):560–564, 2015.
            FUTURE DIRECTIONS                                     Lowsky R, Takahashi T, Liu YP, et al: Protective conditioning for acute graft-
                                                                    versus-host disease. N Engl J Med 353:1321, 2005.
            Complications of HCT, particularly GVHD, remain major barriers   Martin PJ, Weisdorf D, Przepiorka D, et al: National Institutes of Health
            to the wider application of allogeneic HCT for a variety of diseases.   Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic
            Recent advances in the biology of genetic polymorphisms, the che-  Graft-versus-Host Disease: VI. Design of Clinical Trials Working Group
            mocytokine networks, several novel cellular subsets including regula-  report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 12:491, 2006.
            tory T cells, and the direct mediators of cellular cytotoxicity have led   Mathewson  ND,  Jenq  R,  Mathew  AV,  et al:  Gut  microbiome-derived
            to improved understanding of this complex disease process. Animal   metabolites modulate intestinal epithelial cell damage and mitigate graft-
            studies show that modulation of several mediators of the complex   versus-host disease. Nat Immunol 17(5):505–513, 2016.
            GVHD cascade may be able to reduce the undesirable inflammatory   Petersdorf  EW,  Hansen  JA,  Martin  PJ,  et al:  Major-histocompatibility-
            aspects of GVHD while preserving the benefits of GVL. However,   complex class I alleles and antigens in hematopoietic-cell transplantation.
            most  of  the  laboratory  observations  remain  to  be  studied  in  well-  N Engl J Med 345:1794, 2001.
            controlled clinical trials. Multiple cellular effectors may be involved   Ratanatharathorn V, Nash RA, Przepiorka D, et al: Phase III study compar-
            in  GVL,  although  donor T-cell  recognition  of  host  antigens  is  an   ing  methotrexate  and  tacrolimus  (prograf,  FK506)  with  methotrexate
            important element of this process. Cellular immunotherapy such as   and  cyclosporine  for  graft-versus-host  disease  prophylaxis  after
            DLI offers a strategy for separating GVHD and the GVL effect. Both   HLA-identical  sibling  bone  marrow  transplantation.  Blood  92:2303,
            experimental and clinical data suggest that posttransplantation cel-  1998.
            lular immunotherapy can be performed relatively safely and effectively,   Reddy P, Maeda Y, Liu C, et al: A crucial role for antigen-presenting cells
            and optimization of patient selection, cell dose, and timing of admin-  and alloantigen expression in graft-versus-leukemia responses. Nat Med
            istration  may  all  serve  to  limit  toxicity  and  enhance  the  potential   11:1244, 2005.
            GVL effects.                                          Shlomchik WD, Couzens MS, Tang CB, et al: Prevention of graft versus host
                                                                    disease by inactivation of host antigen-presenting cells. Science 285:412,
                                                                    1999.
            SUGGESTED READINGS                                    Shulman HM, Sharma P, Amos D, et al: A coded histologic study of hepatic
                                                                    graft-versus-host  disease  after  human  bone  marrow  transplantation.
            Alousi AM, Weisdorf DJ, Logan BR, et al: Etanercept, mycophenolate, deni-  Hepatology 8:463, 1988.
              leukin or pentostatin plus corticosteroids for acute graft vs. host disease:   Storb  R,  Deeg  HJ,  Whitehead  J,  et al:  Methotrexate  and  cyclosporine
              a randomized phase II trial from the BMT CTN. Blood 114:511, 2009.  compared with cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of acute graft versus
            Anasetti C, Beatty PG, Storb R, et al: Effect of HLA incompatibility on graft-  host  disease  after  marrow  transplantation  for  leukemia.  N  Engl  J  Med
              versus-host disease, relapse, and survival after marrow transplantation for   314:729, 1986.
              patients with leukemia or lymphoma. Hum Immunol 29:79, 1990.  van Bekkum DW, Roodenburg J, Heidt PJ, et al: Mitigation of secondary
            Billingham RE: The biology of graft-versus-host reactions. Harvey Lect 62:21,   disease  of  allogeneic  mouse  radiation  chimeras  by  modification  of  the
              1966-67.                                              intestinal microflora. J Natl Cancer Inst 52:401, 1974.
   1870   1871   1872   1873   1874   1875   1876   1877   1878   1879   1880