Page 198 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 198

150    Part II  Cellular Basis of Hematology


        neutrophils.  The  term  WHIM  is  an  acronym  for  the  main  signs   essential  role  of  SDF-1/CXCR4  and  CXCL2/CXCR2  signaling  in
        of  the  syndrome:  warts,  hypogammaglobulinemia,  infections,  and   the regulation of neutrophil egress and retention.
        myelokathexis;  myelokathexis  refers  to  impaired  egress  of  mature   Successful BM reconstitution requires directed stem cell migration
        neutrophils and other myeloid cells from the BM, causing neutrope-  from the circulation across the blood–BM barrier, and lodgment in
        nia. Al Ustwani et al (2014), Beaussant et al (2012), and Dotta et al   the  specialized  BM  niches  wherein  stem  cells  proliferate  and  dif-
        (2011)  reported  that  the  signature  pathogen  in WHIM  syndrome   ferentiate,  while  maintaining  a  small  pool  of  primitive  stem  cells
        is  human  papillomavirus  (HPV),  which  causes  warts  that  cannot   (see Fig. 14.1).
        be  controlled  with  standard  medical  treatment  and  may  progress   Currently,  there  are  multiple  hypotheses  regarding  the  defined
        to  cancer.  Prophylactic  antibiotics  and  G-CSF  are  often  used  to   entity of the HSPC niche. SDF-1, which has a prominent role in
        reduce  the  frequency  of  infections;  however,  their  specific  efficacy   homing, mobilization, retention, and quiescence of HSPCs, is highly
        has  not  been  established.  This  syndrome  confirms  a  crucial  role   expressed by endosteal osteoblasts, MSPCs, and other stromal cell
        for  CXCR4  signaling  in  neutrophil  trafficking  from  the  BM.  In   types,  implying  the  importance  of  regulating  the  niche  in  order
        the  majority  of  cases,  WHIM  syndrome  is  caused  by  truncation   to  induce  mobilization.  The  retention  capacity  of  HSPCs  in  the
        mutations  in  a  domain  important  for  CXCR4  downregulation   BM during mobilization is altered due to several signaling events,
                              25
        (reviewed  by  Day  and  Link ).  These  mutations  confer  enhanced   chemotactic gradients (e.g., SDF-1 and S1P), as well as breakdown
        responsiveness  to  SDF-1,  suggesting  a  model  in  which  increased   of adhesion interactions. Proteolytic enzymes that degrade adhesion
        CXCR4 signaling leads to increased retention of neutrophils in the   molecules or extracellular matrix components, thus promoting adher-
        BM. Dale et al (2011) and McDermott et al (2011) demonstrated   ence to the BM niches, are a key mechanism that enables egress of
        safety and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy in phase I studies   cells to the peripheral blood. Mimicry of this process by mobilizing
        of the specific CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 (plerixafor [Mozobil])   agents leads to HSPC mobilization, and therefore such procedures
        in WHIM  syndrome,  which  increases  the  numbers  of  neutrophils   can  be  utilized  to  clinically  harvest  repopulating  HSPCs  from  the
                                    29
        in  the  circulation  (reviewed  by  Link ).  Spontaneous  remission  or   blood. Various BM-resident cellular players, including neutrophils,
        cure of WHIM syndrome has been reported in 2015. McDermott   osteoclasts, and osteoblasts, play significant roles in mediating physi-
        et al (2015) describe chromothripsis (chromosome chattering) in one   ological cell egress and stress-induced mobilization to the peripheral
        patient with WHIM syndrome that deleted one copy of chromosome   blood (see Fig. 14.2). Mutual interactions and effects between these
        2,  including  deletion  of  the  disease  allele  CXCR4 R334X   in  a  single   players result in a complex microenvironmental niche that regulates
        HSC. Because CXCR4 regulates stem cell quiescence and the cell   HSPC  function,  retention,  and  migration.  Suppression  of  osteo-
        cycle, this led to their increased proliferation and differentiation due   blasts,  MSPCs,  or  both,  resulting  in  decreased  SDF-1  expression
        to  a  missing  copy  of  CXCR4. This  clone  took  over  the  BM  and   in the BM, seems to be a major mechanism by which detachment
        resorted  normal  immune  function,  which  resulted  in  cure  of  the   of HSPCs is enabled as part of their recruitment to the peripheral
        disease. This study suggests that partial CXCR4 inactivation might   blood. Hence, BM niches are dynamic and undergo alterations on
        enhance clinical BM repopulation in transplanted patients. 30  demand, directly affecting hematopoiesis and motility. Additionally,
                                                              there exist significant data implying a major contribution of innate
                                                              immunity in mobilizing HSPCs (e.g., by neutrophils; see Fig. 14.2).
        CONCLUDING REMARKS                                    This interplay is evident by studies showing activation of neutrophils
                                                              upon administration of mobilizing agents, such as G-CSF. Disrup-
        This chapter discusses the mechanisms and pathways involved in the   tion  of  CXCR4  signaling  is  an  important  mechanism  by  which
        regulation of HSPC homing, egress, and mobilization, emphasizing   neutrophils  and  HSPCs  are  mobilized  into  the  circulation  under
        the major roles of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis in the regulation of these   stress conditions. CXCL2 is a secondary chemokine that, together
        complex interactive processes. In addition, this chapter discusses the   with SDF-1, controls neutrophil trafficking from the BM.



         Relevance to Clinical Hematology

          Optimal  HPSC  migration  from  the  BM  to  the  circulation  (mobilization)   chemotherapy; or alternatively, allogeneic BMT, performed for the most
          for donor cell transplant harvest and from the recipient blood into the   part in the setting of marrow-infiltrating malignancies such as leukemia,
          BM  (homing)  for  stem  cell  lodgment  is  an  essential  prerequisite  for   which uses donor stem cells infused to a patient, thus capitalizing on
          successful BM reconstitution in clinical transplantation. As discussed in   the graft-versus-leukemia effect, which affords a significant reduction in
          this chapter, experimental systems involving human and murine HSPCs   relapse  rate.  One  of  the  major  clinical  obstacles  facing  BM  transplant
          enable  dissection  of  these  migration  processes  to  identify  regulatory   experts today is the mobilization of the so-called “difficult mobilizers,”
          mechanisms to improve clinical settings. Current understanding of HSPC   who fail to mobilize the required amount of CD34 progenitors. Known
          biology reveals that these cells home to the BM homeland, where they   risk factors for insufficient numbers of HSPCs after mobilization include
          proliferate and differentiate, giving rise to multilineage hematopoietic cells   older  age,  previous  failed  mobilization,  heavy  BM  infiltration  by  tumor
          while maintaining a small pool of primitive stem cells. The majority of   cells,  and  previous  chemotherapy  and  radiotherapy,  to  name  just  a
          HSPCs remain confined to the BM cavity in a nonmotile mode, adjacent   few. Several strategies have attempted to address this clinical problem
          to niche-supportive cells that preserve them in a quiescent, nonprolifera-  using optimized current mobilization protocols, among them high-dose
          tive mode, but a very low level of primitive progenitors and stem cells also   G-CSF regimens, erythropoietin, SCF, and chemomobilization achieved
          continuously egress to the circulation as part of homeostasis. The levels   by  chemotherapy  treatment  combined  with  G-CSF.  Despite  the  wide
          of these rare migrating HSPCs are dramatically enhanced during alarm   gamut of therapeutic strategies used, most of them have either failed to
          situations caused by injury and inflammation as part of the host defense   show a clear advantage compared with standard mobilization regimens
          and  repair  mechanism.  The  physiologic  process  of  enhanced  HSPC   or were associated with substantial adverse effects (chemomobilization).
          recruitment from the BM has been used clinically to accelerate stem and   With  the  recent  introduction  of  the  CXCR4  antagonist  AMD3100  (also
          progenitor cell migration to the circulation. Thus collection of HSPCs from   termed plerixafor [Mozobil]), there is renewed optimism in the manage-
          the donor’s peripheral blood, rather than from their BM, became the most   ment  of  difficult-to-mobilize  patients.  AMD3100  mediates  rapid  secre-
          common clinical protocol for BM transplantation (BMT).  tion of SDF-1 from BM stromal cells and its release to the circulation,
                                                                           +
           Clinical BMT has gained immense success within the past four decades   resulting  in  CD34   progenitor  mobilization.  Treatment  with  AMD3100
          in  the  treatment  of  malignant  hematologic  diseases  and  immunodefi-  exhibits  marked  synergism  with  G-CSF,  suggesting  their  different  and
          ciency states by providing long-term immune recovery after high-dose   complementary  mechanisms  of  action  to  induce  HSPC  mobilization.
          chemotherapy.  The  basic  premise  in  BMT  is  either  using  a  patient’s   Several  studies  have  shown  its  success  in  mobilization  of  previously
          own  stem  cells  (i.e.,  autologous  BMT),  which  are  used  primarily  as   failed  myeloma  in  non-Hodgkin  lymphoma  and  Hodgkin  lymphoma
          stem cell support for myeloma or lymphoma while undergoing intensive   patients.
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203