Page 2080 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 2080

Chapter 123  The Blood Vessel Wall  1849


            proteolytic clips that release the Notch intracellular domain, which   fibronectin, collagen type IV α3 chain (tumstatin), and collagen type
            then translocates to the nucleus where it effects transcriptional activa-  XIII  (endostatin),  as  well  as  coagulation  protein  fragments  such  as
                                                                                                   173
            tion  via  the  DNA-binding  protein  CSL  (also  called  RBP-Jκ  or   plasminogen  (angiostatin)  and  antithrombin.   The  mechanism  of
                 159
            CBF1).   Gene  targeting  studies  have  revealed  a  critical  role  for   action of these protein fragments depends on the particular polypep-
            Notch1,  Dll1,  Dll4,  and  Jagged1  in  vascular  development  and   tide, but the functional effect usually is inhibition of endothelial pro-
                     159
            remodeling.   Dll4–Notch1  signaling  between  endothelial  cells   liferation or induction of apoptosis. 173–175  Other endogenous inhibitors
            within the angiogenic sprout serves to restrict tip cell formation in   include interferons, chemokines, and interleukin-12 (IL-12).
            response to VEGF. 160–162  Consequently, inhibition of Dll4 in adult   More  than  100  compounds  are  in  clinical  trials  attempting  to
                                                                                                             176
            mice  results  in  increased  endothelial  proliferation,  sprouting,  and   cause  regression  of  tumors  by  inhibiting  angiogenesis.   These
            branching and increased tumor vascularity. 163,164  However, the vascu-  compounds can be broadly divided into those that act directly by
            lature is disorganized and poorly perfused; thus Dll4 blockade inhibits   targeting the angiogenic endothelial cell and those that act indirectly
            tumor growth in several models. 163,164               by targeting activators of angiogenesis. The latter category includes
                                                                  targeting of oncogenes (e.g., mutant EGFR or Her2) because many
            Coagulation Factors                                   aberrantly activated oncogenes have been shown to induce expression
            Tissue factor (TF) is a member of the cytokine receptor superfamily.   of angiogenic factors. The first clear-cut evidence of efficacy in clinical
            In addition to its role in initiating coagulation as a cofactor for factor   trials of an angiogenic inhibitor for tumor therapy came from regi-
            VII, TF  may  be  involved  in  intracellular  signaling. TF  knock-out   mens directed against the VEGF pathway (e.g., bevacizumab). 177,178
            mice have abnormalities of their large vessels and microvasculature   Because  of  the  short  improvement  in  overall  and  progression-free
            secondary  to  defects  in  mesenchymal  cell  and  periendothelial  cell   survival with the addition of VEGF inhibitors over standard chemo-
                                 25
            accumulation  and  function.   Elevated  TF  expression  in  various   therapy,  it  is  likely  that  heterogeneity  and  inherent  instability  of
            tumors  and  the  associated  angiogenic  endothelium  has  been   tumor cell populations result in the selection of malignant cells that
                  165
            reported.  Expression of mutant oncogenes (K-ras, EGFR) or tumor   feed  their  vasculature  through  factors  other  than  VEGF.  In  this
            suppressor genes (PTEN, p53) leads to increased TF expression and   regard,  use  of  indirect  angiogenic  inhibitors  still  suffers  from  the
            activity, and this may link tumor angiogenesis and the hypercoagu-  likelihood of tumors becoming resistant to the therapy.
                                     165
            lable  states  manifested  in  cancer.   Abnormal  development  of  the   Whether  the  mechanism  of  action  of  these  inhibitors  is  truly
            vasculature also affects 50% of mice that are deficient in factor V.   caused by the abrogation of a functional vascular supply is an open
            The affected mice die in utero, and the 50% embryonic lethality is   question.  VEGF  inhibitors  “normalize”  the  aberrant,  leaky  tumor
            similar to that observed in thrombin receptor–deficient mice that die   vasculature. Other than in renal cancer, VEGF inhibitors have shown
                                       166
            without obvious coagulation defects.  Factor V–dependent genera-  effect only when used in combination chemotherapy regimens, which
            tion of thrombin may be important for early vascular development   has led to the proposal that VEGF pathway inhibition improves vessel
                                                167
            by  signaling  through  the  thrombin  receptor.   Thrombin  can   functionality and perfusion, thus facilitating delivery of chemothera-
            promote angiogenesis through a mechanism that is independent of   peutic agents. 177,178  VEGF–VEGFR signaling also acts in an autocrine
            fibrin  formation. 167,168   Studies  have  suggested  that  thrombin  can   fashion within some tumor cell populations, raising the possibility
            stimulate release of angiogenic factors (e.g., VEGF-A) from tumor   that positive outcomes may have as much to do with direct tumor
                                                            168
            cells and platelets, as well as induce VEGFR-2 on endothelial cells.    kill as with an antiangiogenic effect. Finally, as with organogenesis,
            In addition, APC and protein C inhibitor have been shown to con-  the vasculature may provide a juxtacrine or paracrine role in support-
            tribute  not  only  to  the  regulation  of  hemostasis  but  also  to  cell   ing tumor viability and proliferation independent of the provision of
            inflammation, proliferation, apoptosis, tumor biology, and angiogen-  a circulatory system for delivery of nutrients and oxygen. 53
               169
            esis.  Regarding angiogenesis, APC increases proliferation of vascular   Some  of  the  more  common  side  effects  observed  with  use  of
            endothelial cells and angiogenesis by APC receptor-mediated activa-  VEGF-A inhibitors were not predicted a priori but may be under-
            tion  of  mitogen-activated  protein  kinase,  phosphatidylinositol   standable  in  retrospect.  For  instance,  hypertension  and  arterial
            3-kinase, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) pathways. 170  thrombosis are common side effects. Two possible reasons may explain
              Clinical trials have revealed that treatment with low-molecular–  the hypertensive side effect. One is that VEGF directly activates eNOS
                                                                                                                   179
            weight heparins improves the survival time of cancer patients receiv-  and thus may be responsible in part for basal production of NO.
            ing chemotherapy, an effect that appears to be independent of the   Another  potential  explanation  is  that  podocyte-derived  VEGF  is
                                                                                                           53
            anticoagulant properties of the low-molecular-weight heparins. 171,172    required for proper glomerular function throughout life.  Heterozy-
            Although  antiangiogenic  effects  of  specific  heparanase-generated   gous loss of podocyte VEGF results in hypertension and proteinuria
                                                                             53
            fragments  of  unfractionated  heparins  have  been  demonstrated  in   in  adult  mice.   Given  that  proteinuria  is  also  commonly  seen  in
            vitro, the mechanism of the antitumor effect remains to be defined.  patients treated with VEGF inhibitors, the latter explanation would
              The potential involvement of fibrinolytic factors in angiogenesis   tie two of the side effects seen. The reasons for arterial thrombosis are
            has been mentioned. Interestingly, fragments 1 and 2 of prothrombin   less obvious. Because arterial circulation is more dependent on VEGF,
            have been reported to inhibit angiogenesis, and various other frag-  it is possible that arterial endothelial apoptosis serves as a nidus for
            ments  of  coagulation  and  fibrinolytic  proteins  also  may  inhibit   localized activation of coagulation and platelet aggregation. Apoptotic
            angiogenesis. 173                                     endothelial  cells  have  been  shown  to  increase  thrombin-generating
                                                                  capacity and bind to unactivated platelets and leukocytes. 180–182
            Other Factors                                           More recently, the use of PDGF inhibitors to target pericytes has
            Various other families of ligand–receptor pairs play a role in angio-  been  shown  to  be  a  potentially  effective  antiangiogenic  strategy,
            genesis.  They  include  ephrin–Eph,  Wnt–frizzled,  neuropilin–  particularly in combination with antiendothelial (anti-VEGF) mol-
            semaphorin,  slit–Robo,  and  sonic  hedgehog–patched/smoothened.   ecules. 96,98  “Metronomic” or low-dose, frequent scheduling of tradi-
            Various chemokines have been shown to modulate angiogenesis in   tional  cytotoxic  agents  also  is  reported  to  have  an  antiangiogenic
                                                                                                         183
            either a positive or negative fashion.                effect and has proven efficacious in animal studies.  Antivasculo-
                                                                  genic  therapy  directed  against  recruitment  of  BM-derived  vascular
                                                                  precursors may have a role in future cancer therapeutic regimens, but
            Inhibitors of Angiogenesis                            thus far the evidence is weak at best. 79

            As with the angiogenesis inducers, multiple factors have been reported
            to negatively regulate vascular morphogenesis. 88,173  Of interest is a class   Arteriogenesis
            of  endogenous  angiogenesis  inhibitors  that  are  fragments  of  larger
            proteins  that  have  little  or  no  angiogenesis-related  activity  in  their   Arteriogenesis  is  a  term  coined  to  distinguish  the  development  of
            intact  form.  They  include  fragments  of  ECM  proteins  such  as   collateral  vessels  in  adults  from  the  process  of  angiogenesis. 184,185
   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085