Page 1753 - Williams Hematology ( PDFDrive )
P. 1753

1728           Part XI:  Malignant Lymphoid Diseases                                                                                                                  Chapter 106:  Essential Monoclonal Gammopathy              1729




                 35.  Wallin A, Larsson SC: Body mass index and risk of multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis     64.  O’Connor ML, Rice DT, Buss DH, Muss HB: Immunoglobulin D benign monoclonal
                  of prospective studies. Eur J Cancer 47:1606, 2011.    gammopathy. Cancer 68:611, 1991.
                 36.  Hofmann JN, Moore SC, Lim U, et al: Body mass index and physical activity at different     65.  Kinoshita K, Nagai H, Murate T, et al: IgD monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined
                  ages and risk of multiple myeloma in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Am J Epi-  significance. Int J Hematol 65:169, 1997.
                  demiol 177:776, 2013.                                 66.  Galeazzi  M, Frezzotti A, Paladini C, et al: A case of monoclonal gammopathy of
                 37.  Fonesca R, Bailey RJ, Ahmann GJ, et al: Genomic abnormalities in monoclonal gam-  undetermined significance (MGUS): Type IgD-lambda. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:e123,
                  mopathy of undetermined significance. Blood 100:1417, 2002.  2013.
                 38.  Zandecki M, Lai JL, Genevieve F, et al: Several cytogenetic subclones may be identi-    67.  Imhof JW, Balliux RE, Mul NA, Poen H: Monoclonal and diclonal gamma-pathies. Acta
                  fied within plasma cells from patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined   Med Scand 179(Suppl 455):102, 1966.
                  significance both at diagnosis and during the indolent course of the disease.  Blood     68.  Jensen K, Jensen B, Olesen H: Three M-components in serum from an apparently
                  90:3682, 1997.                                         healthy person. Scand J Haematol 4:485, 1967.
                 39.  Avet-Loiseau H, Facon T, Daviet A, et al: 14q32 translocations and monosomy 13     69.  Kyle RA, Robinson RA, Katzmann JA: The clinical aspects of biclonal gammopathies:
                  observed in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance delineate a mul-  Review of 57 cases. Am J Med 71:999, 1981.
                  tistep process for the oncogenesis of multiple myeloma. Cancer Res 59:4546, 1999.    70.  Riddell S, Traczyk Z, Paraskevas F, Israels LG: The double gammopathies: Clinical and
                 40.  Königsberg R, Ackermann J, Kaufmann H, et al: Deletions of chromosome 13q in   immunological studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 65:135, 1986.
                  monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Leukemia 14:1975, 2000.    71.  Kyle RA, Greipp PR: “Idiopathic” Bence Jones proteinuria. N Engl J Med 306:564, 1982.
                 41.  Schilling G, Dierlamm J, Hossfeld DK: Prognostic impact of cytogenetic aberrations in     72.  Jenner E: Serum free light chains in clinical laboratory diagnostics. Clin Chim Acta
                  patients with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance.   427:15, 2014.
                  Hematol Oncol 23:102, 2005.                           73.  Hill PG, Forsyth JM, Rai B, Mayne S: Serum free light chains: An alternative to the urine
                 42.  Brousseau M, Leleu X, Gerard J, et al: Hyperdiploidy is a common finding in monoclo-  Bence Jones proteins screening test for monoclonal gammopathies. Clin Chem 52:1743,
                  nal gammopathy of undetermined significance and monosomy 13 is restricted to these   2006.
                  hyperdiploid patients. Clin Cancer Res 13:6026, 2007.    74.  Katzmann JA, Dispenzieri A, Kyle RA, et al: Elimination of the need for urine studies
                 43.  Avet-Loiseau H, Li J-Y, Morineau N: Monosomy 13 is associated with the transition of   in the screening algorithm for monoclonal gammopathies by using serum immunofix-
                  monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma. Blood   ation and free light chain assays. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1575, 2006.
                  94:2583, 1999.                                        75.  Jagannath S: Value of serum free light chain testing for the diagnosis and monitoring of
                 44.  Bernasconi P, Cavigliano PM, Boni M, et al: Long-term follow up with conventional   monoclonal gammopathies in hematology. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 7:518, 2007.
                  cytogenetics and band 13q14 interphase/metaphase in situ hybridization monitoring     76.  Beetham R, Wassell J, Wallage MJ, et al: Can serum free light chains replace urine elec-
                  in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. Br J Haematol 118:545,     trophoresis in the detection of monoclonal gammopathies? Ann Clin Biochem 44:516,
                  2002.                                                  2007.
                 45.  Rasillo A, Tabernero MD, Sanchez ML, et al: Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis     77.  Murray DL, Seningen JL, Dispenzieri A, et al: Laboratory persistence and clinical pro-
                  of aneuploidization patterns in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance   gression of small monoclonal abnormalities. Am J Clin Pathol 138:609, 2012.
                  versus multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia. Cancer 97:601, 2003.    78.  Barnidge DR, Dasari S, Botz CM, et al: Using mass spectrometry to monitor mono-
                 46.  Zojer N, Ludwig H, Fiegi M, et al: Patterns of somatic mutations in VH genes reveal   clonal immunoglobulins in patients with a monoclonal gammopathy. J Proteome Res
                  pathways of clonal transformations from MGUS to multiple myeloma. Blood 101:4137,   13:1419, 2014.
                  2003.                                                 79.  Mangiacavalli S, Cocito F, Pochintesta L, et al: Monoclonal gammopathy of undeter-
                 47.  Lloveras E, Sole F, Florensa L, et al: Contribution of cytogenetics and in situ hybrid-  mined significance: A new proposal of workup. Eur J Haematol 91:356, 2013.
                  ization to the study of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Cancer     80.  Rajan AM, Rajkumar SV. Diagnostic evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of unde-
                  Genet Cytogenet 132:25, 2002.                          termined significance. Eur J Haematol 91:561, 2013.
                 48.  Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, et al: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined     81.  Kay NE, Gordon LI, Douglas SD: Autoimmune hemolytic anemia in association with
                  significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: A prospective study.   monoclonal IgM(kappa) with anti-i activity. Am J Med 64:845, 1978.
                  Blood 113:5412, 2009.                                 82.  Lamboley V, Zabraniecki L, Sie P, et al: Myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of
                 49.  Weiss BM, Abadie J, Verma P, et al: A monoclonal gammopathy precedes multiple mye-  uncertain significance associated with acquired von Willebrand’s syndrome. Seven new
                  loma in most patients. Blood 113:5418, 2009.           cases with a literature review. Joint Bone Spine 69:62, 2002.
                 50.  Davies FE, Dring AM, Li C, et al: Insights into the multistep transformation of MGUS     83.  Agarwal N, Klix MM, Burns CP: Successful management with intravenous immuno-
                  to myeloma using microarray expression analysis. Blood 102:4504, 2003.  globulins of acquired von Willebrand disease associated with monoclonal gammopathy
                 51.  Zhan F, Hardin J, Kordesmeier B, et al: Global gene expression profiling of multiple   of undetermined significance. Ann Intern Med 6:141:83, 2004.
                  myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone     84.  Yujiri T, Nakamura Y, Oota I, et al: Acquired von Willebrand syndrome associated with
                  marrow plasma cells. Blood 99:1745, 2002.              monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Ann Hematol 93:1427, 2014.
                 52.  Zwick C, Held G, Auth M, et al: Over one-third of African-American MGUS and mul-    85.  Nocente R, Cammarota G, Gentiloni Silveri N, et al: A case of Sweet’s syndrome asso-
                  tiple myeloma patients are carriers of hyperphosphorylated paratarg-7, an autosomal   ciated with monoclonal immunoglobulin of IgG-lambda type and p-ANCA positivity.
                  dominantly inherited risk factor for MGUS/MM. Int J Cancer 135:934, 2014.  Panminerva Med 44:149, 2002.
                 53.  Weinhold N, Johnson DC, Rawstron AC, et al: Inherited genetic susceptibility to mono-    86.  Carrington PA, Walsh SE, Houghton JB: Benign paraproteinemia and immune neutro-
                  clonal gammopathy of unknown significance. Blood 123:2513, 2014.  penia. Clin Lab Haematol 2:407, 1989.
                 54.  Xu L, Hunter ZR, Yang G, et al: MYD88 L265P in Waldenström macroglobulinemia,     87.  Gabriel DA, Carr ME, Cook L, Roberts HR: Spontaneous antithrombin in a patient
                  immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy, and other B-cell lymphoproliferative   with benign paraprotein. Am J Hematol 25:85, 1987.
                  disorders using conventional and quantitative allele-specific polymerase chain reaction.     88.  Sluiter WJ, Marrink J, Houwen B: Monoclonal gammopathy with an insulin binding
                  Blood 121:2051, 2013.                                  IgG(K) M-component, associated with severe hypoglycaemia. Br J Haematol 62:679,
                 55.  Xu L, Hunter ZR, Yang G, et al: Detection of MYD88 L265P in peripheral blood of   1986.
                  patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of     89.  Wasada T, Egueli Y, Takayama S, et al: Insulin autoimmune syndrome associated with
                  undetermined significance. Leukemia 28:1698, 2014.     benign monoclonal gammopathy. Diabetes Care 12:147, 1989.
                 56.  Radl J, Hollander CF: Homogeneous immunoglobulins in sera of mice during aging. J     90.  Ahlberg RE, Lefvert AK: Monoclonal gammopathy and antibody activity against the
                  Immunol 112:2271, 1974.                                acetylcholine receptor. Am J Hematol 29:49, 1988.
                 57.  Radl J, De Glopper E, Schuit HR, Zurcher C: Idiopathic paraproteinemia: II. Trans-    91.  Disdier P, Swiader L, Aillaud M-F, et al: Ig M monoclonal gammopathy, lymphoid pro-
                  plantation of the paraprotein-producing clone from old to young 57B1/KaLwRij mice.   liferations and lupus anticoagulant. Am J Med 102:319, 1997.
                  J Immunol 122:609, 1979.                              92.  Dear A, Brennan SO, Sheat MJ, et al: Acquired dysfibrinogenemia caused by monoclo-
                 58.  Radl J: Age-related monoclonal gammopathies: Clinical lessons from the aging C57BL   nal production of immunoglobulin lambda light chain. Haematologica 92:e111, 2007.
                  mouse. Immunol Today 11:234, 1990.                    93.  Maldonado JE, Velosa JA, Kyle RA, et al: Fanconi syndrome in adults: A manifestation
                 59.  van Arkel C, Hopstaken CM, Zurcher C, et al: Monoclonal gammopathies in aging mu,   of a latent form of myeloma. Am J Med 58:354, 1975.
                  kappa-transgenic mice: Involvement of the B-1 cell lineage. Eur J Immunol 27:2436,     94.  Gavarotti P, Fortina F, Costa D, et al: Benign monoclonal gammopathy presenting with
                  1997.                                                  severe renal failure. Scand J Haematol 36:115, 1986.
                 60.  George G, Gilburd B, Schoenfeld Y: The emerging concept of pathogenic natural anti-    95.  Maes B, Vanwalleghem J, Kuypers D, et al: IgA antiglomerular basement membrane
                  bodies. Hum Antibodies 8:70, 1997.                     disease associated with bronchial carcinoma and monoclonal gammopathy. Am J Kid-
                 61.  Milla F, Oriol A, Aguilar J, et al: Usefulness and reproducibility of cytomorphic evalu-  ney Dis 33:E3, 1999.
                  ations to differentiate myeloma from monoclonal gammopathies of unknown signifi-    96.  Hashimoto T, Arakawa K, Ohta Y, et al: Acquired Fanconi syndrome with osteomala-
                  cance. Am J Clin Pathol 115:127, 2001.                 cia secondary to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Intern Med
                 62.  Rajkumar SV, Mesa RA, Fonesca R, et al: Bone marrow angiogenesis in 400 patients   46:241, 2007.
                  with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, multiple myeloma, and     97.  Pozzi C, D’Amico M, Fogazzi GB, et al: Light chain deposition disease with renal
                  primary amyloidosis. Clin Cancer Res 8:2210, 2002.     involvement: Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors. Am J Kidney Dis 42:1154,
                 63.  Ludwig H, Vormittag W: “Benign” monoclonal IgE gammopathy. Br Med J 281:539,   2003.
                  1980.                                                 98.  Merlini G, Stone MJ: Dangerous small B-cell clones. Blood 108:2520, 2006.







          Kaushansky_chapter 106_p1721-1732.indd   1728                                                                 9/21/15   12:40 PM
   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758