Page 213 - Williams Hematology ( PDFDrive )
P. 213

188            Part IV:  Molecular and Cellular Hematology                                                                                                         Chapter 13:  Cytogenetics and Genetic Abnormalities             189




               (60 percent), and another by the t(11;18)(q21.2;q21.3)(25 to 50 percent)   gene). The t(4;14)(p16.3;q32.3) is noted in approximately 15 percent of
                                   85
               and its variants (Chap. 101).  Of note is that the t(11;18) is not observed in   patients and deregulates the expression of the fibroblast growth factor
               primary large B-cell gastric lymphoma. The t(11;18) results in the fusion   receptor 3 gene (FGFR3) translocated to the der(14), and the WHSC1/
               of the apoptosis-inhibitor gene BIRC3 (API2), to a novel gene at 18q21.3,   MMSET domain remaining on the der(4) chromosomes. The t(14;16)
               MALT1, whose product activates the nuclear factor κB (NFκB) pathway.  (q32.3;q23), noted in 5 percent of cases, results in the overexpression
                   A number of recurring chromosomal abnormalities have been   of the MAF transcription factor gene. Cyclin D3 overexpression occurs
               recognized in T-cell leukemias and lymphomas (see Table   13–4;   in the context of the t(6;14)(p21.1;q32.3),  observed in 4 percent of
               Chap. 104). Similar to B-cell neoplasms, in which rearrangements fre-  patients. The translocation partners for the remaining 10 to 15 percent
               quently involve the chromosomal bands containing the immunoglob-  of myeloma cases are currently unknown. The t(4;14) and t(14;16) are
               ulin gene loci, T-cell neoplasms often have rearrangements involving   both associated with a poor clinical outcome, whereas the t(11;14) con-
               band 14q11.2, the site of the T-cell receptor α-chain (TRA) and δ-chain   fers a favorable prognosis. Translocations involving unknown partners
               (TRD) genes or, less often, one of two regions of chromosome 7 (7q34   confer an intermediate prognosis.
               and 7p14) to which the T-cell receptor  β-chain  (TRB) and  γ-chain   Chromosome 1 abnormalities are prevalent in multiple myeloma,
                                                  78
               (TRG)  genes  have  been  localized,  respectively.   These  translocations   frequently resulting in both gain of 1q and loss of 1p, and are associated
                                                                                      88
               result from aberrant V-D-J recombination events. With few exceptions,   with a shorter survival.  Furthermore, gene expression profiling studies
               the involved gene on the partner chromosome encodes a transcription   that identified a high-risk disease signature noted a significant enrich-
                                                                                                     88
               factor, whose expression is deregulated or activated as a result of the   ment of genes located on chromosome 1.  For this reason, it is now
               rearrangement (see Table  13–4). As a consequence of a chromosomal   recommended that a comprehensive FISH testing panel for multiple
               rearrangement that brings an oncogene under the controlling influence   myeloma include detection of chromosome 1 abnormalities, particu-
               of promoters and enhancers that are active in T-cell receptor synthesis,   larly using probes for 1q.
               T-cells may gain a proliferative advantage, resulting in malignant clonal   Additional events occur with disease progression, including muta-
               expansion.                                             tions of  NRAS and  KRAS,  MYC deregulation, and epigenetic altera-
                   A distinctive subtype of lymphoma, namely, anaplastic large cell   tions. Activating mutations of NRAS or KRAS have been identified in
               lymphoma (ALCL) is characterized by a young age at presentation, and   monoclonal gammopathy (approximately 5 percent), and at a higher
               skin and/or lymph node infiltration by large, often bizarre lymphoma   frequency in myeloma (30 to 40 percent); but the frequency may be
               cells, which preferentially involve the paracortical areas and lymph node   higher in patients who relapse (80 percent).  Several genes are silenced
                                                                                                     89
               sinuses (Chap. 98). The majority of such tumors express one or more   through  aberrant  promoter  hypermethylation  in  both  monoclonal
               T-cell antigens, a minority express B-cell antigens, and some express both   gammopathy and myeloma, including  DAPK1 (67 percent),  SOCS1,
               T- and B-cell antigens (the null phenotype). A reciprocal translocation,   CDKN2B (p15), and CDKN2A (p16). 83
               t(2;5)(p23.2;q35.1), t(1;2)(q25;p23), or variant rearrangement involving
               the ALK tyrosine kinase gene at 2p23.2 appears to be restricted to ALCL   REFERENCES
               of either T-cell or null phenotype, and is present in a high percentage
               of these cases.  The tumor cells are positive for CD30 on the cell mem-    1.  Carlson KM, Le Beau MM, Cytogenetics/Fluorescent in situ Hybridization in Clinical
                         86
               brane and in the Golgi region, and ALK expression is detectable in 60 to   Hematology, edited by N S Young, SL Gerson, KA High, pp 1336–1351. Elsevier, Phila-
                                                                         delphia, PA, 2005.
               85 percent of cases, where it confers a more favorable outcome (5-year     2.  Gilliland DG: Molecular genetics of human leukemias: New insights into therapy.
               survival, 80 percent in ALK+ vs. 40 percent in ALK− tumors). The t(2;5)   Semin Hematol 39:6–11, 2002.
               has also been found in CD30+ primary cutaneous lymphomas.    3.  Shaffer LG, McGowan-Jordan J, Schmid C, editors: ISCN 2013: An International Sys-
                                                                         tem for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (2013). Recommendations of the International
                                                                         Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. S. Karger, Basel, 2013.
               MYELOMA                                                  4.  Gozzetti A, Le Beau MM: Fluorescence in situ hybridization: Uses and limitations.
               As in CLL, the application of molecular cytogenetic tools, such as FISH,   Semin Hematol 37:320–333, 2000.
               has led to the discovery of numerous chromosomal abnormalities in     5.  Fonseca R, Bergsagel PL, Drach J, et al: International Myeloma Working Group molecu-
                                                                         lar classification of multiple myeloma: Spotlight review. Leukemia 23:2210–2221, 2009.
               myeloma, its precursor essential monoclonal gammopathy (Chaps. 105     6.  Hartmann L, Biggerstaff JS, Chapman DB, et al: Detection of genomic abnormalities
               and 106), and plasma cell leukemia (Chap. 107). 83,87  Monoclonal gam-  in multiple myeloma: The application of FISH analysis in combination with various
                                                                         plasma cell enrichment techniques. Am J Clin Pathol 136:712–720, 2011.
               mopathy is characterized by chromosomal aneuploidy, IGH transloca-    7.  Radich JP, Oehler V: Monitoring chronic myelogenous leukemia in the age of tyrosine
               tions (45 percent of patients), and deletions of 13q (15 to 50 percent).   kinase inhibitors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 5:497–504, 2007.
               Plasma cell myeloma is a malignancy of postfollicular B cells and is char-    8.  Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, et al: Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
                                                                         identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 403:503–511, 2000.
               acterized by the acquisition of complex chromosomal rearrangements.     9.  Mullighan CG, Su X, Zhang J, et al: Deletion of IKZF1 and prognosis in acute lympho-
               As in monoclonal gammopathy, the earliest changes involve deletions of   blastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 360:470–480, 2009.
               13q14, and translocations of the IGH gene, which deregulate the expres-    10.  Den Boer ML, van Slegtenhorst M, De Menezes RX, et al: A subtype of childhood acute
               sion of oncogenes located near the translocation breakpoints. Loss of   lymphoblastic leukaemia with poor treatment outcome: A genome-wide classification
                                                                         study. Lancet Oncol 10:125–134, 2009.
               chromosome 13 or a del(13q) is the most frequently observed chromo-    11.  Best T, Li D, Skol AD, et al: Variants at 6q21 implicate PRDM1 in the etiology of
                                                      83
               somal loss in myeloma and confers a poor prognosis.  With the use of   therapy-induced second malignancies after Hodgkin’s lymphoma.  Nat Med 17:941–
               FISH, deletions of 13q are detected in 40 to 50 percent of patients with   943, 2011.
               myeloma and may be associated with specific 14q translocations.    12.  Melo JV, Barnes DJ. Chronic myeloid leukaemia as a model of disease evolution in
                                                                         human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 7:441–453, 2007.
                   Among the most frequent chromosomal rearrangements noted in     13.  O’Hare T, Eide CA, Deininger MW. New Bcr-Abl inhibitors in chronic myeloid leuke-
               plasma cell malignancies are translocations involving the IGH locus on   mia: Keeping resistance in check. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 17:865–878, 2008.
               14q32. IGH translocations are detectable by interphase FISH analysis     14.  Hughes T, White D: Which TKI? An embarrassment of riches for chronic myeloid leu-
                                                                         kemia patients. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2013:168–175, 2013.
               in approximately 10 percent of patients with monoclonal gammopathy,     15.  Nowak D, Ogawa S, Muschen M, et al: SNP array analysis of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-
               40 to 50 percent of patients with myeloma, and more than 60 percent   resistant chronic myeloid leukemia identifies heterogeneous secondary genomic altera-
               of patients with plasma cell leukemia.  The t(11;14)(q13.3;q32.2) is   tions. Blood 115:1049–1053, 2010.
                                            83
               found in 15 percent of cases, and results in cyclin D1 overexpression     16.  Deininger MW, Cortes J, Paquette R, et al: The prognosis for patients with chronic
                                                                         myeloid leukemia who have clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in Philadelphia chromo-
               and may deregulate expression of  MYEOV (myeloma overexpressed   some–negative cells. Cancer 110:1509–1519, 2007.





          Kaushansky_chapter 13_p0173-0190.indd   188                                                                   17/09/15   6:33 pm
   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218