Page 524 - Clinical Immunology_ Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 524

504          ParT fOur  Immunological Deficiencies


                                                                      76
        prevention and successful treatment of infections are strong   (VOD).   Alternative conditioning agents include treosulfan
                                 2
        determinants of HSCT outcome  and is associated with decreased   (1-treitol-1,4-bis-methanesulfonate), which has both myeloabla-
        frequency of GvHD. In particular, infection prevention is critical   tive and immunosuppressive properties, as well as an improved
        in patients with SCID receiving matched unrelated HSCT, where   patient safety profile.
        the risk of GvHD has been reported to be >70% (the main cause   Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) involving incomplete
        of morbidity and mortality). 68                        ablation of the bone marrow may also be beneficial in permitting
                                                               engraftment and immune reconstitution. However, where such
        Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation                regimens may offer improved survival and reduced toxicity, there
        HSCT is the only potentially curative therapeutic approach for   have also been reports of increased incidences of mixed donor
                                         69
        patients SCID and various forms of CID.  The replacement of   chimerism and graft failure. In these instances, repeat HSCT or
        defective HSCs with cells from a healthy donor, typically bone   donor lymphocyte infusions may be necessary, which may pose
        marrow, allows T-cell precursors to repopulate the native thymus   further risk to patients. 77
        and permits reconstitution of a functional immune system. As   HSCT without conditioning has been attempted in patients
        a result of advancements made in preparing the host, donor   who are too sick to tolerate pre-transplant chemoablation,
        cells, conditioning regimens, and supportive therapy, HSCT   however, this is associated with a high frequency of complications
                                                                           78
        survival rates have markedly improved since the early 1980s   and mortality.  In such circumstances, it is recommended that
        (Chapter 82).                                          the patient be stabilized until a full protocol can be implemented.
        Donor Source                                           Prophylaxis and Treatment of Graft versus Host Disease
        Transplantation involving related HLA-identical donors (RID),   GvHD is caused by T cell mediated attack of the host tissue by
        usually a sibling, carry the most favorable prognosis, with survival   the graft, and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality
        rates of 90 to 100%. Complete immune reconstitution occurs   to allogeneic HSCT recipients. The principal affected organs are
        rapidly and carries a low risk of GvHD. However, since such   skin, gastrointestinal tract and liver, with the current grading
        donors are available in less than 20% of cases, donor sources   system (grades I-IV) based upon the extent of organ involve-
                                                                    79
        including  HLA-matched unrelated donors  (MUD)  or  HLA-  ment.  Risk factors for GvHD include donor-host incompatibility
        mismatched related donors (MMRD) can be considered.    as well as the source of stem cells, and can be significantly reduced
                                                         70
           The survival rates for MUD HSCT are greater than 70%,    by introducing prophylactic immunosuppression and depletion
        with  some  centers  reporting  rates  of up  to  83% 68,71   and  low   of donor T cells before infusion. The primary response to such
                          72
        incidences of GvHD.  This modality has proven especially   first-line treatment is the most important predictor of long term
        effective in cases with CID. Experience with MMRD HSCT in   survival in patients with acute GvHD.
        the past has been disappointing, 73,74  but recent reports suggest   Options for pharmacologic prophylaxis include monotherapy
        improved survival rates for these transplants, although follow-up   with a calcineurin inhibitor (such as cyclosporine or tacrolimus),
                                     2
        in many of the cases is still too short.  Such transplants involving   or in combination with steroids, methotrexate or mycopholate
        haploidentical donors require the marrow to be depleted of T   mofetil. The efficacy of steroids in improving the outcome and
        cells, and immune reconstitution may be prolonged. Rates of   probability of survival is well documented. 80,81
        graft failure necessitating a second transplant have been high,   T cell depletion is recommended for HSCT involving HLA-
                                              72
        along with incomplete immune reconstituation.  Complications   mismatched donors. However, while depletion of donor T cells
        include opportunistic infections, chronic GVHD, autoimmunity   using physical separation techniques, monoclonal antibodies or
        and late deaths.                                       anti-thymocyte globulin can reduce GvHD, it is also associated
           Nevertheless, regardless of donor source, HSCT prior to 3.5   with delayed immune reconstitution and an increased incidence of
        months of age or before the onset of infection is associated with   post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders and life-threatening
        high rates of survival (95% and 90% respectively) when compared   infections. 79
        to older children (76%). 2
                                                               Gene Therapy
        Conditioning                                           Gene therapy represents a therapeutic option for patients with
                                                                                                                 62
        Pre-transplant conditioning helps to prepare the recipient marrow   primary immunodeficiency who lack a HLA-identical donor
        for optimal engraftment of donor stem cells and T cell reconstitu-  (Chapter 85). By using retroviruses to introduce a functional
        tion, and plays an important role in the long-term outcome of   copy of the defective gene into the patient’s own HSCs, this
              75
        HSCT.  Whether conditioning is necessary depends in part on   technique negates the need for a donor and is not associated
        the type of immunodeficiency. For example, whereas myeloabla-  with complications normally arising from HLA-incompatibility.
        tion is necessary for HSCT in patients with sufficient immune   To date, gene therapy has been demonstrated to be extremely
        cells to reject a graft (as in CID), it may not be indicated for   effective in treating patients with ADA deficiency, resulting in a
        patients with SCID receiving HLA-matched stem cells from a   variable increase in T and B cell numbers as well as significant
        sibling donor. However, it is worth noting that donor B cells   improvement of immune function. Importantly, there have been
        rarely engraft in the absence of conditioning regimens, and many   no reports of serious adverse events or malignancy to this
        patients remain on lifelong immunoglobulin replacement with   indication. 23
        increased risk of infective lung damage and T lymphocyte   However, early attempts to utilize gene therapy in other forms
        senescence.                                            of primary immunodeficiency were met with mixed results, and
                                                                                                                 83
           Myeloablative conditioning with busulfan and cyclophospha-  highlighted various pitfalls related to the first-generation vectors.
        mide was once commonly used for HSCT in patients with SCID   A number of serious adverse events, including leukemia, were
        and CID, although a protocol including busulfan and fludarabine   caused by preferential integration of retroviral vectors in the
        is currently proposed due to risk of veno-occlusive disease   proximity of transcription initiation sites, leading to increased
   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529