Page 828 - Clinical Immunology_ Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 828

800          Part SIX  Systemic Immune Diseases


        Immunosuppressants given to patients can significantly improve   point each); with 15–19 major items and 19–23 minor items,
        disease control but may increase the risk of malignancy. The   the range of sores is 0–76. The PVAS was developed as a pediatric
        continued use of high doses of glucocorticoid therapy contrib-  version of the BVAS, but validated in children with vasculitis
        utes to hypertension, diabetes, heart diseases, osteoporosis, and     and  demonstrated  to  be  effective  at  discriminating  different
        infection.                                             disease states and is increasingly used as a research tool in pediatric
           It is therefore obvious that careful evaluation of a patient’s   vasculitis.
        status is required throughout the course of disease. Constant
        vigilance is required to detect and manage any flare-up of disease
        because the consequences of untreated inflammation of vessels
        to vital organs can be severe. Although for most patients, initial    KEY CONCEPtS
        therapy is very successful and improvements in disease status is
        obvious  to  the  patient,  the  subsequent  disease  course  can  be   Assessment of Disease Activity in Vasculitis
        much more complicated because of comorbidities, the evolution
        of disease-related damage, and morbidity caused by treatment   •  For small- and medium-vessel vasculitis in adults, version 3 and a
                                                                   specific version of the BVAS for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA)
        as well as disease flare-ups. There are no suitable biomarkers   are used.
        that  can  be  universally  applied  in  small-  and  medium-vessel   •  BVAS version 3 is the most generic and applicable across different
        vasculitides to determine the patient’s disease state to provide   forms of vasculitis; BVAS for GPA has been specifically designed for
        an evidence-based rationale for adjustment of therapy. ANCA   use in GPA and contains very specific items related to that
        titers fluctuate during the course of disease, and although ANCA   condition.
        remains a very useful diagnostic test, its value in managing   •  During sequential monitoring, a time frame of 3 months is recommended
                                                                   so that disease activity is considered to be of most relevance during
        variations in disease activity is very limited. Up to 40% of patients   this time. The time frame is based on pragmatic clinical experience
        have an elevation of ANCA without any new deterioration in   that this is the usual time taken during which immunosuppressive
        clinical state, but a recent study has shown that patients with   therapy is likely to have a significant effect on active disease
        renal involvement as part of their presentation are likely to have   manifestations.
                                     77
        relapses associated with ANCA rises.  Among 166 patients with
        AAV, all were positive for ANCA and 104 had renal involvement
        (a mixture of PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA). The hazard ratio
        for  ANCA rises predicting subsequent relapse was 11.09 (CI
        5.01–24.55), suggesting that this test may be of value in detection   Damage Assessment in Vasculitis
        of future relapse in this subset of patients. However, for the   The concept of damage in patients with vasculitis is about the
        majority of patients with systemic vasculitis, careful clinical   permanent consequences of having vasculitis. It is an attempt
        evaluation remains a cornerstone of effective disease management   to measure disease burden regardless of cause. The Vasculitis
        as recommended by the EULAR guidelines on management of   Damage Index (VDI) is the most widely used and validated
        systemic vasculitis. 78                                measure for assessment of damage in vasculitis (reviewed in
                                                                             79
           In simple terms, at the onset of the condition, disease activity   Ponte et al., 2014).  The VDI captures the long-term consequences
        is the dominant problem, and treatment should be directed   of a diagnosis of vasculitis and its treatment and associated
        toward it; but over the course of time, with the development of   comorbidities. Damage is defined as lasting at least 3 months
        consequences of vasculitis or its treatment, there is an increasing   or occurring at least 3 months ago for single time point events
        component of damage or scarring and also side effects of drug   (e.g., stroke or myocardial infarction) and should be recorded
        therapy. Similarly, different patients function at different levels   as a permanent change to the patient’s damage status. A VDI of
        with the same amount of disease, or damage, and therefore the   >5 points recorded within 6 months of disease carries a significant
        ability to perform normal tasks is an important component of   increased risk of subsequent mortality compared with a lower
                                                                                                                 79
        their overall condition to consider (Table 58.3).      damage index at 6 months (reviewed in Ponte et al., 2014).
           The primary tool used is the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity   VDI is a useful index of future harm. A further development of
        Score (BVAS) in adults and the Paediatric Vasculitis  Activity   the damage index has been the combined damage assessment
                                                         79
        Score (PVAS) in children (reviewed in Ponte et al., 2014).    (CDA). In a comparative study with the VDI, CDA was shown
        Training is recommended for assessment in the Birmingham   to be inferior to it (reviewed in Ponte et al., 2014). 79
        Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS). BVAS provides a quantitative
        score based on individual items, providing an effective means   TREATMENT
        to define the patient’s status with regards to response to therapy.
        Many recent studies of different immunosuppressive agents have   Once a diagnosis of small- and medium-vessel vasculitis has
        made use of the BVAS either to define improvement in terms   been established, treatment should be focused on patients and
        of a fall in BVAS score or to define a cut-off representing active   their problems rather than the specific diagnosis. Treatment for
        disease, or inactive disease, or flare-up, depending on the number   different forms of vasculitis may look very different, but many
        of items present. Although it is subject to observer variability,   aspects of different forms of vasculitis require the same therapeutic
        it provides an effective means by which groups of patients can   approach.  Without  a clear understanding of the  underlying
        be compared against each other and allows individual patients   pathogenesis of disease, we are inevitably led by the need to
        to be followed up over the course of their condition. The score   suppress inflammation and reduce damage to prevent mortality
        is weighted according to the organ system and the individual   and improve survival. However, as well as modifying immune
        manifestation, to reflect the severity of the disease. The range   dysregulation, it is important to consider other aspects of the
        of scores for BVAS and PVAS are 0–63. For BVAS GPA, items   patient’s condition, such as comorbidities and the prevention
        are divided into major (scoring 3 points) and minor (scoring 1   of future comorbidities.
   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833