Page 172 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 172

P1: PIG/
                   0521861241c03  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:42  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                   158                         Proofs
                                   the method used in the rest of the proof. Although the cases are not explicitly
                                   labeled as cases in the proof, it is important to realize that the rest of the proof
                                   has the form of a proof by cases. In case 1 we assume that m is prime, and in
                                   case 2 we assume that it is a product of primes. In both cases we are able to
                                   produce an unlisted prime as required to complete the proof.


                                   Theorem 3.7.3. For every positive integer n, there is a sequence of n consec-
                                   utive positive integers containing no primes.

                                   Proof. Suppose n is a positive integer. Let x = (n + 1)! + 2. We will show that
                                   none of the numbers x, x + 1, x + 2, ··· , x + (n − 1) is prime. Since this is a
                                   sequence of n consecutive positive integers, this will prove the theorem.
                                     To see that x is not prime, note that
                                                    x = 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 ··· (n + 1) + 2
                                                      = 2 · (1 · 3 · 4 ··· (n + 1) + 1).

                                   Thus, x can be written as a product of two smaller positive integers, so x is not
                                   prime.
                                     Similarly, we have
                                                   x + 1 = 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 ··· (n + 1) + 3
                                                        = 3 · (1 · 2 · 4 ··· (n + 1) + 1),

                                   so x + 1 is also not prime. In general, consider any number x + i, where
                                   0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1. Then we have
                                         x + i = 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 ··· (n + 1) + (i + 2)
                                              = (i + 2) · (1 · 2 · 3 ··· (i + 1) · (i + 3) ··· (n + 1) + 1),
                                   so x + i is not prime.


                                   Commentary. A sequence of n consecutive positive integers is a sequence of
                                   the form x, x + 1, x + 2,..., x + (n − 1), where x is a positive integer. Thus,
                                   the logical form of the statement to be proven is ∀n > 0∃x > 0∀i(0 ≤ i ≤
                                   n − 1 → x + i is not prime), where all variables range over the integers. The
                                   overall plan of the proof is exactly what one would expect for a proof of a
                                   statement of this form: We let n > 0 be arbitrary, specify a value for x, let i
                                   be arbitrary, and then assume that 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 and prove that x + i is not
                                   prime. As in the proof of Theorem 3.7.1, to prove that x + i is not prime we
                                   show how to write it as a product of two smaller integers.
                                     Before the demonstration that x + i is not prime, where i is an arbitrary
                                   integer between 0 and n − 1, the proof includes verifications that x and x + 1
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177