Page 173 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 173

P1: PIG/
                   0521861241c03  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:42  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                                 More Examples of Proofs               159
                            are not prime. These are completely unnecessary and are only included to make
                            the proof easier to read.


                              For readers who are familiar with the definition of limits from calculus, we
                            give one more example, showing how proofs involving limits can be worked
                            out using the techniques in this chapter. Readers who are not familiar with this
                            definition should skip this example.
                                                        2
                                                      2x − 5x − 3
                            Example 3.7.4. Show that lim         = 7.
                                                  x→3    x − 3
                            Scratch work

                            According to the definition of limits, our goal means that for every positive
                            number ε there is a positive number δ such that if x is any number such that 0 <
                                            2


                            |x − 3| <δ, then    2x −5x−3  − 7 <ε. Translating this into logical symbols, we

                                             x−3
                            have
                                                                   2
                                                                  2x − 5x − 3
                                ∀ε> 0∃δ> 0∀x 0 < |x − 3| <δ →                − 7 <ε .

                                                                    x − 3
                            We therefore start by letting ε be an arbitrary positive number and then try to
                            find a positive number δ for which we can prove

                                                             2
                                                            2x − 5x − 3
                                      ∀x 0 < |x − 3| <δ →              − 7 <ε .

                                                              x − 3

                            The scratch work involved in finding δ will not appear in the proof, of course.
                            In the final proof we’ll just write “Let δ = (some positive number)” and then
                            proceed to prove
                                                            2x − 5x − 3
                                                             2
                                      ∀x 0 < |x − 3| <δ →              − 7 <ε .

                                                              x − 3
                            Before working out the value of δ , let’s figure out what the rest of the proof
                            will look like. Based on the form of the goal at this point, we should proceed by
                                                                                   2

                            letting x be arbitrary, assuming 0 < |x − 3| <δ , and then proving    2x −5x−3  −
                                                                                   x−3

                            7 <ε. Thus, the entire proof will have the following form:

                                Let ε be an arbitrary positive number.
                                  Let δ = (some positive number).
                                    Let x be arbitrary.
                                      Suppose 0 < |x − 3| <δ .
                                                  2


                                        [Proof of    2x −5x−3  − 7 <ε goes here.]

                                                   x−3
                                                                  2
                                                                 2x −5x−3

                                      Therefore 0 < |x − 3| <δ →       − 7 <ε.

                                                                  x−3
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178