Page 341 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 341

P1: PIG/KNL  P2: IWV/
                   0521861241c07  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  1:12  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                          The Cantor–Schr¨ oder–Bernstein Theorem      327
                            (1862–1943) gave a famous lecture in which he listed what he believed to be
                            the most important unsolved mathematical problems of the time, and the proof
                            or disproof of the continuum hypothesis was number one on his list.
                              The status of the continuum hypothesis was “resolved” in a remarkable way
                            by the work of Kurt G¨odel (1906–1978) in 1939 and Paul Cohen (1934– ) in
                            1963. The resolution turns out to require even more careful analyses than we
                            have given in this book of both the notion of proof and the basic assumptions
                            underlying set theory. Once such analyses have been given, it is possible to
                            prove theorems about what can be proven and what cannot be proven. What
                            G¨odel and Cohen proved was that, using the methods of mathematical proof
                            and set-theoretic assumptions accepted by most mathematicians today, it is
                            impossible to prove the continuum hypothesis, and it is also impossible to
                            disprove it!



                                                       Exercises

                             1. Prove that   is reflexive and transitive. In other words:
                            ∗
                               (a) For every set A, A   A.
                               (b) For all sets A, B, and C,if A   B and B   C then A   C.
                             2. Prove that ≺ is irreflexive and transitive. In other words:
                               (a) For every set A, A  ≺ A.
                               (b) For all sets A, B, and C,if A ≺ B and B ≺ C then A ≺ C.
                             3. Suppose A ⊆ B ⊆ C and A ∼ C. Prove that B ∼ C.
                             4. Suppose A   B and C   D.
                               (a) Prove that A × C   B × D.
                               (b) ProvethatifAandC aredisjointandBandDaredisjoint,then A ∪ C
                                   B ∪ D.
                               (c) Prove that P (A)   P (B).
                             5. For the meaning of the notation used in this exercise, see exercise 21 of
                            ∗
                               Section 7.1. Suppose A   B and C   D.
                                                        A
                                                             B
                               (a) Prove that if A  = ∅ then C   D.
                               (b) Is the assumption that A  = ∅ needed in part (a)?
                             6. (a) Prove that if A   B and B is finite, then A is finite and |A|≤|B|.
                               (b) Prove that if A ≺ B and B is finite, then A is finite and |A| < |B|.
                             7. Prove that for every set A, A ≺ P (A). (Hint: See exercise 4 of Sec-
                               tion 7.2. Note that in particular, if A is finite and |A|= n then, by exercise
                                                        n
                                                                                     n
                               10 of Section 6.2, |P (A)|= 2 . It follows, by exercise 6(b), that 2 > n.
                               Of course, you already proved this, by a different method, in exercise 12(a)
                               of Section 6.3.)
   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346