Page 350 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 350

P1: PIG/
                   0521861241apx01  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:56  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                   336          Appendix 1: Solutions to Selected Exercises
                                   14. P  Q    R   P → (Q → R)    ¬R → (P →¬Q)
                                      F    F   F        T                T
                                      F    F   T        T                T
                                      F   T    F        T                T
                                      F   T    T        T                T
                                      T    F   F        T                T
                                      T    F   T        T                T
                                      T   T    F        F                F
                                      T   T    T        T                T


                                                             Section 3.3
                                    1. Suppose ∃x(P(x) → Q(x)). Then we can choose some x 0 such that
                                      P(x 0 ) → Q(x 0 ). Now suppose that ∀xP(x). Then in particular, P(x 0 ),
                                      and since P(x 0 ) → Q(x 0 ), it follows that Q(x 0 ). Since we have found a
                                      particular value of x for which Q(x) holds, we can conclude that ∃xQ(x).
                                      Thus ∀xP(x) →∃xQ(x).
                                    3. Suppose that A ⊆ B \ C,but A and C are not disjoint. Then we can choose
                                      some x such that x ∈ A and x ∈ C. Since x ∈ A and A ⊆ B \ C, it follows
                                      that x ∈ B \ C, which means that x ∈ B and x /∈ C. But now we have both
                                      x ∈ C and x /∈ C, which is a contradiction. Thus, if A ⊆ B \ C then A and
                                      C are disjoint.
                                                                 √
                                                                   2
                                    7. Suppose x > 2. Let y = (x +  x − 4)/2, which is defined since
                                       2
                                      x − 4 > 0. Then
                                                    √                              √
                                                                             2
                                                      2
                                            1   x +  x − 4        2        2x + 2x x − 4
                                                                                      2
                                        y +   =            +     √       =       √         = x.
                                            y        2        x +  x − 4    2(x +  x − 4)
                                                                    2
                                                                                    2
                                    9. Suppose F is a family of sets and A ∈ F. Suppose x ∈∩F. Then by the
                                      definition of ∩F, since x ∈∩F and A ∈ F, x ∈ A. But x was an arbitrary
                                      element of ∩F, so it follows that ∩F ⊆ A.
                                   12. Hint: Assume F ⊆ G and let x be an arbitrary element of ∪F. You must
                                      prove that x ∈∪G, which means ∃A ∈ G(x ∈ A), so you should try to find
                                      some A ∈ G such that x ∈ A. To do this, write out the givens in logical
                                      notation. You will find that one of them is a universal statement, and one
                                      is existential. Apply existential instantiation to the existential one.
                                   14. Suppose x ∈∪ i∈I P (A i ). Then we can choose some i ∈ I such that x ∈
                                      P (A i ), or in other words x ⊆ A i . Now let a be an arbitrary element of x.
                                      Then a ∈ A i , and therefore a ∈∪ i∈I A i . Since a was an arbitrary element
                                      of x, it follows that x ⊆ U i∈I A i , which means that x ∈ P (U i∈I A i ). Thus
                                      ∪ i∈I P (A i ) ⊆ P (∪ i∈I A i ).
   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355