Page 349 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 349

P1: PIG/
                   0521861241apx01  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:56  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                         Appendix 1: Solutions to Selected Exercises   335
                                                        6
                                   the theorem tells us that 2 − 1 is not prime. This is correct, since
                                    6
                                   2 − 1 = 63 = 9 · 7.
                               (b) We can conclude that 32767 is not prime. This is correct, since
                                   32767 = 151 · 217.
                               (c) The theorem tells us nothing; 11 is prime, so the hypotheses are not
                                   satisfied.
                             4. Suppose 0 < a < b. Then b − a > 0. Multiplying both sides by the pos-
                               itive number b + a, we get (b + a) · (b − a) > (b + a) · 0, or in other
                                      2
                                                                                2
                                                          2
                                                     2
                                          2
                                                                            2
                               words b − a > 0. Since b − a > 0, it follows that a < b . Therefore
                                                   2
                                               2
                               if 0 < a < b then a < b .
                             9. Hint: Add b to both sides of the inequality a < b.
                            11. We will prove the contrapositive. Suppose c ≤ d. Multiplying both sides of
                               this inequality by the positive number a, we get ac ≤ ad. Also, multiplying
                               both sides of the given inequality a < b by the positive number d gives us
                               ad < bd. Combining ac ≤ ad and ad < bd, we can conclude that ac <
                               bd. Thus, if ac ≥ bd then c > d.
                                                                           2
                            14. Since x > 3 > 0, by the theorem in Example 3.1.2, x > 9. Also, multi-
                               plying both sides of the given inequality y < 2by −2 (and reversing
                               the direction of the inequality, since −2 is negative) we get −2y > −4.
                                                              2
                               Finally, adding the inequalities x > 9 and −2y > −4 gives us
                                2
                               x − 2y > 5.

                                                      Section 3.2

                             1. (a) Suppose P. Since P → Q, it follows that Q. But then, since Q → R,
                                   we can conclude R. Thus, P → R.
                               (b) Suppose P. To prove that Q → R, we will prove the contrapositive,
                                   so suppose ¬R. Since ¬R → (P →¬Q), it follows that P →¬Q,
                                   and since we know P, we can conclude ¬Q. Thus, Q → R,so
                                   P → (Q → R).
                             5. Suppose a ∈ A \ B. This means that a ∈ A and a /∈ B. Since a ∈ A and
                               a ∈ C, a ∈ A ∩ C. But then since A ∩ C ⊆ B, it follows that a ∈ B, and
                               this contradicts the fact that a /∈ B. Thus, a /∈ A \ B.
                             8. Hint: Assume a < 1/a < b < 1/b. Now prove that a < 0, and then use
                               this fact to prove that a < −1.
                            11. (a) The sentence “Then x = 3 and y = 8” is incorrect. (Why?)
                               (b) One counterexample is x = 3, y = 7.
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354