Page 351 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 351

P1: PIG/
                   0521861241apx01  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:56  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                         Appendix 1: Solutions to Selected Exercises   337
                            17. Hint: The last hypothesis means ∀A ∈ F ∀B ∈ G(A ⊆ B), so if in the
                               course of the proof you ever come across sets A ∈ F and B ∈ G, you can
                               conclude that A ⊆ B. Start the proof by letting x be arbitrary and assuming
                               x ∈∪F, and prove that x ∈∩G. To see where to go from there, write these
                               statements in logical symbols.
                                                                    2
                            20. The sentence “Then for every real number x, x < 0” is incorrect. (Why?)
                            22. Based on the logical form of the statement to be proven, the proof should
                               have this outline:
                                            Let x = ....
                                              Let y be an arbitrary real number.
                                                          2
                                                [Proof of xy = y − x goes here.]
                                                                         2
                                              Since y was arbitrary, ∀y ∈ R(xy = y − x).
                                                                2
                                            Thus, ∃x ∈ R∀y ∈ R(xy = y − x).
                                 This outline makes it clear that y should be introduced into the proof
                               after x. Therefore, x cannot be defined in terms of y, because y will not yet
                               have been introduced into the proof when x is being defined. But in the
                               given proof, x is defined in terms of y in the first sentence. (The mistake
                               has been disguised by the fact that the sentence “Let y be an arbitrary real
                               number” has been left out of the proof. If you try to add this sentence to
                               the proof, you will find that there is nowhere it could be added that would
                               lead to a correct proof of the incorrect theorem.)
                            25. Here is the beginning of the proof: Let x be an arbitrary real number. Let
                               y = 2x. Now let z be an arbitrary real number. Then....




                                                      Section 3.4

                             1. (→) Suppose ∀x(P(x) ∧ Q(x)). Let y be arbitrary. Then since ∀x(P(x) ∧
                               Q(x)), P(y) ∧ Q(y), and so in particular P(y). Since y was arbitrary,
                               this shows that ∀xP(x). A similar argument proves ∀xQ(x): for arbitrary
                               y, P(y) ∧ Q(y), and therefore Q(y). Thus, ∀xP(x) ∧∀xQ(x).
                                 (←) Suppose ∀xP(x) ∧∀xQ(x). Let y be arbitrary. Then since ∀xP(x),
                                P(y), and similarly since ∀xQ(x), Q(y). Thus, P(y) ∧ Q(y), and since y
                               was arbitrary, it follows that ∀x(P(x) ∧ Q(x)).
                             4. Suppose that A ⊆ B and A  ⊆ C. Since A  ⊆ C, we can choose some a ∈ A
                               such that a /∈ C. Since a ∈ A and A ⊆ B, a ∈ B. Since a ∈ B and a /∈
                               C, B  ⊆ C.
                             7. Let A and B be arbitrary sets. Let x be arbitrary, and suppose that
                               x ∈ P (A ∩ B). Then x ⊆ A ∩ B. Now let y be all arbitrary element of
                               x. Then since x ⊆ A ∩ B, y ∈ A ∩ B, and therefore y ∈ A. Since y was
   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356