Page 377 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 377

P1: PIG/
                   0521861241apx01  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:56  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                         Appendix 1: Solutions to Selected Exercises   363
                                                                                     √
                               (b) It will be convenient to introduce the notation c 1 = (1 +  5)/2
                                                √
                                                                                  n    n
                                   and c 2 = (1 −  5)/2. Then for any n ≥ 2, a n = sc + tc =
                                                                                  1
                                                                                       2
                                   sc n−2 2 1  n−2 2 2  n−2 (1 + c 1 ) + tc n−2 (1 + c 2 ) = (sc 1 n−2  +
                                       c + tc
                                               c = sc
                                                      1
                                    1
                                             2
                                                                   2
                                    n−2     n−1    n−1
                                   tc 2  ) + (sc 1  + tc 2  ) = a n−2 + a n−1 .
                                                             √
                               (c) Hint: Let s = (5a 0 + (2a 1 − a 0 ) 5)/10 and t = (5a 0 − (2a 1 − a 0 )
                                   √
                                    5)/10.
                                                        n
                                                               n
                            10. Hint: The formula is a n = 2 · 3 − 3 · 2 .
                            14. Let a be the larger of 5k and k(k + 1). Now suppose n > a, and by the
                               division algorithm choose q and r such that n = kq + r and 0 ≤ r < k.
                               Now note that if q ≤ 4 then n = kq + r ≤ 4k + r < 5k ≤ a, which is a
                               contradiction. Therefore q > 4, so q ≥ 5, and by Example 6.1.3 it follows
                                    q   2                                    2
                               that 2 ≥ q . Similar reasoning shows that q ≥ k + 1, so q ≥ q(k + 1) =
                                                                            2 k
                                                                                  k
                                                           n
                                                                      q k
                               kq + q > kq + r = n. Therefore 2 ≥ 2 kq  = (2 ) ≥ (q ) ≥ n .
                            18. We proceed by induction on j.
                                 Base case: j = 1. Suppose that p 1 , q 1 , q 2 ,..., q k are prime num-
                               bers and p 1 = q 1 q 2 ··· q k . Since p 1 is prime, we must have k = 1 and
                                p 1 = q 1 .
                                 Induction step: Suppose that j ≥ 1, and for all k ≥ 1 and all non-
                               decreasing sequences of primes p 1 , p 2 ,..., p j and q 1 , q 2 ,..., q k ,if
                                p 1 p 2 ··· p j = q 1 q 2 ··· q k then j = k and p i = q i for all i, 1 ≤ i ≤ j.Now
                               suppose p 1 , p 2 ,..., p j+1 and q 1 , q 2 ,..., q k are nondecreasing sequences
                               of primes and p 1 p 2 ··· p j+1 = q 1 q 2 ··· q k . Then k ≥ 2, since otherwise
                               we have p 1 p 2 ··· p j+1 = q 1 , contradicting the fact that q 1 is prime. Also,
                                p j+1 | (q 1 q 2 ··· q k ), so by exercise 17(b), p j+1 | q i for some i. But then
                                p j+1 = q i ≤ q k . Similar reasoning shows that q k ≤ p j+1 ,so p j+1 = q k .
                               Therefore p 1 p 2 ··· p j = q 1 q 2 ··· q k−1 , and by inductive hypothesis it fol-
                               lows that k − 1 = j and p i = q i for 1 ≤ i ≤ j.
                            20. Hint: The formula is a n = F n+2 /F n+1 .
                                                      Section 6.5
                             1. (a) To see that F  = ∅, notice that B ⊆ A ⊆ A and A is closed under
                                   f,so A ∈ F. It follows that ∩F is defined, and in fact by exercise 9
                                   of Section 3.3, ∩F ⊆ A. According to the definition of F, for every
                                   C ∈ F, B ⊆ C, so by exercise 10 of Section 3.3, B ⊆∩F. Thus, we
                                   have B ⊆∩F ⊆ A. To see that ∩F is closed under f, suppose that
                                   x ∈∩F. LetC ∈ F be arbitrary. Then x ∈ C and C is closed under f,so
                                   f (x) ∈ C. Since C was arbitrary, this shows that ∀C ∈ F( f (x) ∈ C),
                                   so f (x) ∈∩F. Finally, to see that F is smallest, suppose that B ⊆
                                   C ⊆ A and C is closed under f. Then C ∈ F, and therefore, applying
                                   exercise 9 of Section 3.3 again, ∩F ⊆ C.
   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382