Page 379 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 379

P1: PIG/
                   0521861241apx01  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:56  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                         Appendix 1: Solutions to Selected Exercises   365
                               x = (n + 2)! + 2, and suppose that 0 ≤ i ≤ n.If i = n then we have

                                x + i = (n + 2)! + 2 + i = (i + 2)! + (i + 2) = (i + 2) ((i + 1)! + 1),
                               so (i + 2) | (x + i). Now suppose 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1. By inductive hypoth-
                               esis, we know that (i + 2) | ((n + 1)! + 2 + i), so we can choose some
                               integer k such that (n + 1)! + 2 + i = k(i + 2), and therefore (n + 1)! =
                               (k − 1)(i + 2). Therefore


                                x + i = (n + 2)! + 2 + i = (n + 2)(n + 1)! + (i + 2)
                                    = (n + 2)(k − 1)(i + 2) + (i + 2) = (i + 2) ((n + 2) (k − 1) + 1),
                               so (i + 2) | (x + i).



                                                       Chapter 7

                                                      Section 7.1

                             1. (a) Define f : Z → N by the formula f (n) = n − 1. It is easy to check
                                             +
                                   that f is one-to-one and onto.
                               (b) Let E ={n ∈ Z | n is even}, and define f : Z → E by the formula
                                   f (n) = 2n. It is easy to check that f is one-to-one and onto, so Z ∼ E.
                                                                                 +
                                                        +
                                   But we already know that Z ∼ Z, so by Theorem 7.1.3, Z ∼ E, and
                                   therefore E is denumerable.
                             4. (a) No. Counterexample: Let A = B = C = Z and D ={1}.
                                                                     +
                               (b) No. Counterexample: Let A = B = N, C = Z , and D = ∅.
                                                                        −
                             6. (a) We proceed by induction on n.
                                     Base case: n = 0. Suppose that m ∈ N and there is a one-to-one,
                                   onto function f : I n → I m . Since n = 0, I n = ∅. But then since f is
                                   onto, we must also have I m = ∅,so m = 0 = n.

                                     Induction step: Suppose that n ∈ N, and for all m ∈ N,if I n ∼ I m
                                   then n = m. Now suppose that m ∈ N and I n+1 ∼ I m . Let f : I n+1 →
                                   I m be a one-to-one, onto function. Let k = f (n + 1), and notice that
                                   1 ≤ k ≤ m,so m is positive. Using the fact that f is onto, choose some
                                   j ≤ n + 1 such that f ( j) = m.
                                     We now define g : I n → I m−1 as follows:

                                                            f (i)  if i  = j,

                                                    g(i) =
                                                           k     if i = j.
                                   We leave it to the reader to verify that g is one-to-one and onto. By
                                   inductive hypothesis, it follows that n = m − 1, so n + 1 = m.
   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384