Page 55 - T-I JOURNAL19 4
P. 55

STRATEGIES TO CLOSE THE GENDER GAP                       703



             face. After giving a seminar as a man, he overheard  selves reflected in the entrepreneurial archetypes of
             the following comment: “Ben Barres gave a great  popular culture. Although start-ups are not the main
             seminar today, but his work is much better than his  avenue for technology commercialization, they are an
             sister’s work” (7). The comment was made by an indi-  important component of the innovation pipeline and
             vidual who failed to realize that there was only one  provide obvious support for the regional economic
             Professor Barres and had attributed more value to  development efforts of universities. Women are defi-
             the research of male Professor Barres than to that of  nitely under-represented among entrepreneurs, being
             female Professor Barres.                   only half as likely as men to start a business according
                                                        to the Kauffman Foundation (12).
             A Problem of Perception
               Another manifestation of gender bias that might  An Issue of Motivation
             be relevant for IP generation is the tendency to attri-    At NC State, only eight of the 34 start-up compa-
             bute the accomplishments of female team members   nies launched in the last three years had a woman as
             to male colleagues. Margaret Rossiter’s article on the   founder or co-founder. However, the fact that women
             “Matilda effect” in science and the recent editorial   may not visualize themselves as the “entrepreneur
             by Christy Haynes resonated with the authors of this   in the hoodie” may not be the major reason. Given
             article (8,9). Dr. Ligler had just presented the work   that female faculty already face an uphill challenge
             of the team she led at a national meeting when a   when working to achieve success within the academic
             well-known senior scientist approached her and her   environment, they may be understandably reluctant
             (male) technician and complimented him on Dr.   to devote the additional time and effort required to
             Ligler’s presentation of his project—much to her male   launch a new start-up company. This reluctance could
             colleague’s mortification! For many women, the issue   potentially be mitigated by a better understanding
             of whether or not to insist on being recognized for   of options such as licensing or by learning from a
             their contributions versus the potential ramifications   mentor who has started a company while maintaining
             of alienating supervisors or colleagues results in an   a work-life balance.
             inculcated willingness to work behind the scenes. The     Another common misconception is that the only
             corollary to this approach is not stepping forward to   reason for technology commercialization is to make
             take credit as a co-inventor.              money. While creating value and rewarding stock-
               In addition to a reluctance to take credit for indi-  holders who support commercialization are essential
             vidual contributions that would inherently constitute   accomplishments required for a company to survive,
             inventorship, female faculty may also be less secure   there are successful companies founded because of
             about their leadership capabilities in their current or   the motivation to help other people. Teaching faculty
             potential professional organizations. Sheryl Sandberg   that the process of IP generation and commercial-
             makes a convincing case in Lean In that women often
             undervalue their contributions to organizations as   ization is a vehicle for impacting the lives of others
             compared to their male peers. There is a growing   in a positive way can be a very powerful motivator.
             body of evidence to support the concept that women
             disproportionately lack the confidence to pursue   POTENTIAL APPROACHES TO CLOSE THE
             opportunities for which they are qualified as com-  GENDER GAP
             pared to their male counterparts (10,11). This lack    While we contend that female faculty absolutely
             of confidence may impact the willingness of female  have creative capabilities equivalent to their male
             faculty to engage in the technology commercializa-  colleagues, addressing the role of gender bias in the
             tion process, especially as entrepreneurs.  distribution of research funds to support technol-
               Entrepreneurs are frequently portrayed by the   ogy-based innovation is beyond the scope of this
             media as twenty-something Caucasian males wear-  publication. Thus, we will focus on the capacity of
             ing hoodies. While the reality of entrepreneurship  university TTOs to develop proactive outreach and
             is vastly different, this perception may discourage  faculty education programs to foster an understanding
             individuals from participating who do not see them-  of the fiscal and social values of IP and the variety of
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60