Page 50 - T-I JOURNAL19 4

698 MERCIER, RANJIT & REARDON WOMEN INNOVATOR PROGRAMS IN ACADEMIA 699

2015;21(2):199–214. academic advantage: gender disparities in pat- top-entrepreneurial-press-release. autm.net/autm-info/leadership/committees/
2. Burroughs Welcome Fund and Howard Hughes enting. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):1–10. 25. Association of University Technology Man- women-inventors-committee/.
Medical Institute. Making the right moves: a 13. Ghiasi G, Lariviere V, Sugimoto CR. On the agers. AUTM Women Inventors Committee 26. Herskowitz O, Butterfield B. 2016. Know thy-
practical guide to scientific management for compliance of women engineers with a gendered (WIC). Oakbrook Terrace (IL): AUTM; c2013- self: how well do you understand your own IP
post-docs and new faculty. 2 ed. Research scientific system. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):1–19. 2017 [accessed 2017 Aug 27]. https:// www. strategy? IAM. 2016;78:9–15.
nd
Triangle Park (NC) and Chevy Chase (MD): 14. Long JS. Measures of sex differences in scientific
Burroughs Welcome Fund and Howard Hughes productivity. Social Forces. 1992;71(1):159–78.
Medical Institute; 2009. 15. Whittington KB, Smith-Doerr L. 2005.
3. Association of Public and Land-Grant Univer- Gender and commercial science: Women’s
sities. APLU Task Force on Tenure, Promotion, patenting in the life sciences. J Technol Transf.
and Technology Transfer Survey Results and 2005;30(4):355–70.
Next Steps. Washington (DC): APLU; 2015. 16. Colyvas JA, Snellman K, Bercovitz J, Feldman M.
4. Sanberg PR, Gharib M, Harker PT, Kaler EW, Disentangling effort and performance: a renewed
Marchase RB, Snads TD, Arshadi N, Sarkar S. look at gender differences in commercializing
Changing the academic culture: valuing patents medical school research. 2012;37(4):478–89.
and commercialization toward tenure and career 17. Cook LD, Kongcharoen C. The idea gap in pink
advancement. Proceedings of the National Acad- and black. The National Bureau of Economic
emy of Science. 2014;111(18):6542–7. Research. NBER Working Paper No. 16331.
5. Owen-Smith J, Powell WW. 2001. To patent Cambridge (MA): NBER; 2010. 10.3386/w16331.
or not: faculty decisions and institutional suc- 18. Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE. Gender differ-
cess at technology transfer. J Technol Transf. ences in patenting in the academic life sciences.
2001;26:99–114. Science. 2006;313(5787):665–7.
6. Office of the Chief Economist, Economics and 19. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. The gen-
Statistics Administration. Women in STEM: a der patenting gap. Washington (DC): Institute
gender gap to innovation. Washington (DC): for Women’s Policy Research; 2016.
Department of Commerce (US); 2011. 20. Whittington KB. Mothers of invention?: gender,
7. Live Science. What is STEM Education? New motherhood, and new dimensions of productiv-
York (NY): Live Science; c2014 [accessed 2017 ity in the science profession. Work Occupation.
Aug 27]. https://www.livescience.com/43296- 2011;38(3):417–56.
what-is-stem-education.html. 21. Murray F, Graham L. Buying science and sell-
8. National Science Foundation. ADVANCE at a ing science: gender differences in the market
glance. Arlington (VA): National Science Foun- for commercial science. Ind Corpe Change.
dation; c2001 [accessed 2017 Aug 27]. https:// 2007;16(4):657–89.
www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/advance/. 22. Association of University Technology Managers.
9. Stephan PE, El-Ganainy A. The entrepreneurial FY2015 Licensing Survey. Oakbrook Terrace
puzzle: explaining the gender gap. J Technol (IL): AUTM; 2017.
Transf. 2007;32(5): 475–87. 23. Washington University in St. Louis Office of
10. Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE. Commercial Technology Management: Facts & Figures. St.
science: a new arena for gender differences in Louis (MO): Washington University in St. Louis;
scientific careers? IRLE Working Paper No. c2017 [accessed 2017 Aug 27]. https://otm.wustl.
182-09. Berkeley (CA): University of California, edu/facts-figures/.
Berkeley; 2009. 24. The Princeton Review. The Princeton Review
11. Thursby JG, Thursby MC. Gender patterns & Entrepreneur name the top 25 undergrad
of research and licensing activity of science & grad schools for entrepreneurship stud-
and engineering faculty. J Technol Transf. ies for 2017. Natick (MA): TPR Education
2005;30(4):343–53. IP Holdings, LLC; c2016 [accessed 2017 Aug
12. Sugimoto CR, Ni C, West JD, Lariviere V. The 27]. https://www.princetonreview.com/ press/