Page 15 - Technology and Innovation Journal - 19-1
P. 15

UNIVERSITY-BASED TECHNOLOGY ACCELERATORS                     353



             BEST PRACTICES: WHAT MAKES A GOOD          knowledge of the technological area is a plus but not
             PROGRAM?                                   required; it is most important for the administrators
               The Columbia programs have a combined nine   to be familiar with technology commercialization
             years of experience running accelerator programs.   and entrepreneurship overall. The full-time admin-
             Below, we share what we believe to be successful   istrator needs to be self-organized and comfortable
             approaches to core elements of the accelerator pro-  working on a small team where resources are limited.
             grams: program oversight, outreach and application   Many programs may also be able to rely on available
             development, selection process, educational elements,   resources from within the technology transfer office
             and awardee process. Naturally, these are not the only   or elsewhere at the university to fill in gaps as needed.
             ways to approach these steps, nor are they necessarily
             the best. However, we share them here in the hopes   Outreach and Application Development
             of starting the conversation. Columbia has developed    During the initial years of a new program, it can
             many of the template materials for activities below,  be challenging to spread the word to potential appli-
             which we can share with interested institutions upon  cants. Accelerators can increase their outreach and
             request.                                   application development through the following:

                                                          • Engage with technology transfer offices and cam-
             Program Oversight                              pus entrepreneurship organizations to advertise
               Because an accelerator involves much more than     the program via newsletters, events, referrals,
             simply soliciting applications and awarding funds,     and direct contact with researchers via presen-
             when setting up a new initiative, it is essential that     tations at departmental meetings and new faculty
             dedicated staff be available to oversee the many     orientations.
             activities in order to ensure that a quality program   • Target researchers with relevant grant awards
             is created and nurtured. This includes a focus on the     or submitted grant applications by coordinating
             programmatic efforts necessary to attract project     with the sponsored projects office or sourcing
             applications, the creation or honing of educational     them from publicly available grant agency awardee
             programs capable of supporting teams, and the     lists.
             creation of vital external collaborations and part-  • Leverage accelerator alumni teams for referrals
             nerships. Because of the many stakeholders involved     to their scientific colleagues.
             (applicant teams, awardee teams, mentors, judges,   • Circulate advertising print material, such as fly-
             teaching teams, and others), as well as the vari-    ers and handouts, to relevant departments.
             ous phases taking place concurrently (e.g., project   • Host multiple information sessions on campus:
             applications from new teams, project management     ◉ Invite researchers as well as technology transfer
             of existing teams, educational programs), we found      officers and entrepreneurship directors to dis-
             that setting up an accelerator requires, at a minimum,      cuss the specifics of the program.
             one full-time equivalent (FTE) or more if resources     ◉ Present a simple, accessible document con-
             allow. Our Columbia-Coulter medical technology      taining eligibility requirements, important
             accelerator is run with 1.5 FTEs, while a multi-insti-     dates, requirements for awardees, and benefits
             tutional program such as PowerBridgeNY requires at      of participating, including specific examples
             least 2 FTEs but ideally more. Once a program is fully      of success if possible.
             established and systems are in place, and/or there are   • Assemble a steering committee of key stakehold-
             multiple accelerators that can share core resources,     ers within the university community (research
             it could be possible to scale back the number of staff     faculty, entrepreneurship educators, technology
             dedicated to any one program, but the initiation of a     transfer officers, department chairs and/or
             successful program will require a focused and ded-    deans) to champion the program by helping to
             icated staff.                                  shape policies, provide feedback, and spread the
               The skill set of the administrative team can vary     word across campus.
             depending on the goals of the program. In most cases,
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20