Page 18 - Technology and Innovation Journal - 19-1
P. 18

356                                   BYRD ET AL.



        The above list enumerates the common elements     learning. Teams should be required to speak with
      that most if not all accelerators and proof-of-concept     potential customers in order to assess the market
      centers should consider. However, the Columbia pro-    problem and determine how effective their tech-
      grams have built upon the common core elements to     nology is as a solution, which allows teams to
      suit the needs of each specific program. For example,     pivot their solutions in response to market feed-
      the processes for the energy and medical technology     back. Presenting live each session forces teams
      accelerators are largely similar based on both indus-    to dedicate the time required to complete assign-
      tries being capital intensive with long development     ments and learn the methodology. In-person
      timelines, while the media program was adapted     sessions also allow teams to meet each other, fos-
      to fit the faster-moving media industry in particu-    tering a sense of community among participants.
      lar. For example, start-ups in the media space often     Even for teams whose proposals do not move
      go through faster development cycles, require less     forward, this kind of educational experience can
      money to launch, and, with typically software-based     be leveraged for future entrepreneurial pursuits.
      products, depend more upon speed-to-market than   • Mentors: Assigning business mentors to work
      bulletproof patents. Accordingly, the Combine pro-    closely with teams for an extended period of time
      gram adopted a single-step application process and     can fill basic business knowledge gaps, inject
      solicited brief IP reviews from technology transfer     domain expertise, provide an impartial observer,
      offices rather than full IP reviews from outside counsel.     and potentially open doors to target industries.
                                                      A “dating period” during the pairing process
      Educational Elements                            allows teams and mentors to gain familiarity with
        While many teams initially apply for the promise     each other before committing to work together
      of funding, they often acknowledge that the edu-    throughout the program. Program administra-
      cational experiences were actually equally or more     tors ensure there is an onboarding and check-in
      valuable. Educational elements, which are extremely     process for the mentors. Mentors are given an
      customizable in timing and execution, could include     overview of the methodology and tasks teams are
      any combination of the following:               working on and are invited to educational events.
         • Methodology: The existing Columbia accele-     Administrators periodically meet with both
           rators offer educational “boot camps” grounded      teams and mentors to ensure the relationship is
           in characterizing an unmet need and assess-     working and that they are collaborating on a
           ing how well a proposed solution fits that      regular basis. Feedback can be formally or infor-
           need. While one uses a variation on the Bio-     mally collected from the teams to ensure that the
           Design program and the other two utilize the Lean      best mentors are invited back for future rounds.
           LaunchPad approach, the most critical aspect    • Pitch Prep Event: Presenting a business pitch
           is to select a methodology (ideally an existing      (vs. giving a scientific presentation) will most
           approach with a successful track record), get      likely be new for most teams, so an event to accli-
           trained in how to teach it, customize a curric-     mate them to the format and to prepare them for
           ulum for one’s specific needs, and then modify it      potential questions can dramatically improve
           for future cohorts as needed. Assigning readings      their final products. Some programs choose to
           and videos (e.g., customer discovery interview      assemble a volunteer panel of mock judges
           examples) can reinforce teachings. Both Bio-     consisting of mentors, investors, and other local
           Design and Lean LaunchPad have extensive and      experts in the field. Other programs hire pro-
           modular resources available online for teachers      fessional pitch and presentation coaches for a
           and students, the use of which can avoid huge      few days to work with the teams on content as
           amounts of work and expense when launching      well as presentation style. The Columbia pro-
           an accelerator.                            grams generally allocate a significant amount
         • Group Learning and Feedback: As much as      of time to teams for practicing pitches, includ-
           possible, there is an emphasis on and effort      ing receiving iterative feedback from instructors,
           towards in-person sessions for peer-to-peer      mentors, and judges.
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23