Page 16 - Technology and Innovation Journal - 19-1
P. 16

354                                   BYRD ET AL.



        In addition to soliciting team and project applica-  • A phased application process for applicant
      tions, it is also important to put thought into who will     teams with increasing commitment required
      review applications and serve in mentorship roles to     for each incremental step is used. A multi-stage
      guide and assist teams. Depending on the strength of     process provides the chance for teams to get
      the local ecosystem, recruiting an initial set of men-    additional feedback and allows judges to get
      tors and judges could be challenging. Some ideas for     a sense of each team’s “coachability.”  For more
      maximizing the chances of finding top-tier advisors     rigorous programs, stages might include:
      include:                                         ◉ Idea Grants: After hearing about the con-
                                                        cept through another institution, PBNY
         • Direct outreach to personal contacts and alumni.        instituted an easy but optional element of
           The steering committee originally put together        the application process to encourage more
           to mold the structure of the program will likely        initial submissions, with nominal prizes
           have an impressive combined contact list. Accel-       attached. The so-called “Idea Grant” sub-
           erator administrators can help jog memo-       mission form is short and informal, asking
           ries by looking through the LinkedIn contacts        respondents to simply name their team
           of the steering committee to suggest candidates.      members (no biographies needed), describe
         • Solicit referrals from existing reviewers and        their technologies in one paragraph, and
           mentors. Even people who decline to serve due        describe why they want to apply to the
           to time constraints may be willing to suggest        program in another paragraph. If the pro-
           other candidates.                            gram is industry-specific, a question about
         • Solicit referrals from local business plan com-       how the technology fits into the industry
           petitions, incubators, business organizations,        can be added. Applicants will also have to
           chambers of commerce, and entrepreneurship        select a 30-minute time slot to interview with
           organizations.                               the program managers, which is a time both
         • Attend and recruit at local events relevant for        for the program managers to assess the team
           the industry.                                and technology as well as for the team to ask
         • Create a ready-made guidebook for men-       questions to determine if the program is a
           tors and judges  that includes what  you       good fit. After the interview, the program
           expect of them, forms required for signature,        managers send a follow-up email to each team
           and commonly asked questions.
                                                        indicating whether or not they are encouraged
      Selection Process                                 to submit a pre-proposal. Those that ulti-
        Applicants move through selection processes that        mately do submit a pre-proposal receive a
                                                        nominally-valued Visa gift card for their
      are unique to each program but share common key       lab’s use. Applicants can only receive one
      elements:
                                                        Idea Grant per submission, so reapplica-
         • External judges are selected from a mix of indus-       tions are not permitted.
           try, venture investors, entrepreneurs, and tech-      ◉ Pre-Proposal: A short (one- to two-page)
           nical experts, who collectively lend credibility        written proposal and/or self-made video to
           and real-world experience to the program.      provide a basic overview of the proposed
           ◉ Judges can be subdivided into approxi-       project is required. Judges can use  this
            mately equal groups based on expertise,       material to assess the inherent feasibility and
            with certain applications assigned to each       applicability of a given project, primarily in
            group. We recommend having enough           order to screen out teams early on before
            reviewers so that each judging group gets        requiring  too  much  effort by  the team.
            no more than ten applications assigned to it        Keeping this short can encourage more
            to limit fatigue. It is also to be expected that        researchers to apply and minimize effort in
            some judges will drop out or become         case they do not proceed. Videos are also
            unresponsive, so adding in a few more judges        excellent recruiting tools for mentors who
            than you expect to need may be useful.      might not want to wade through long
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21