Page 45 - Technology and Innovation Journal - 19-1
P. 45

DARTMOUTH PHD INNOVATION PROGRAM                         383



             this regard due to a long history of integrating the  and Holekamp and Crump Funds have supported
             practical aspects of market analysis and business  additional PhD Innovation Program students.
             planning into interdisciplinary engineering design   Recruiting
             project coursework at the undergraduate level. Guest
             lectures are presented by visiting entrepreneurs, ven-    A core requirement for students selected for our
             ture capitalists, and inventors. An enterprise plan   program is the same as the regular Ph.D. program—
             based on the development and commercialization of   strong promise for academic success in coursework
             novel technology research is developed and presented   and research. The overlay emphasis on business and
             to a panel of experts for a grade.  Students report on   entrepreneurship coursework and activities must not
             their projects both orally and in written form and  come at the expense of rigor in advanced engineering
             are graded on a pass-fail basis.           sciences coursework and performance in the adviser’s
                                                        lab, whether on the adviser’s or the student’s own
             Financial Constructs and Administration    research. While the core requirements are the same,
               The program director oversees the program with   the challenge in recruiting is finding students who
             guidance from the dean of the engineering school   have characteristics and interests that go beyond the
             and assistance from the assistant dean for academic   core. The way we look at this has changed in a subtle
             and student affairs. In most cases, five full years of   manner over the first few years of the program as
             funding support the student through the completion   students come into and successfully complete the
             of the Ph.D. in engineering, advance the adviser’s   program. Initially, the assumption was that a per-
             research agenda, and support the student’s innovation   centage of the Ph.D. candidate population either has
             training and personal research agenda. PhD Inno-  a strong interest in entrepreneurship or a research
             vation Program students are supported by graduate   idea they want to develop, and this type of student
             research assistantships for the first two years of the   was the main target for the program. Our program
             program, which are funded via adviser-secured grants   is the only one that combines research and entrepre-
             or fellowships. In this period of the program, course-  neurship in such an integrated fashion, and finding
             work and professional skill-building is emphasized as   ideal candidates has been challenging. In addition,
             adviser-directed research ramps up, and the student   because the program  is unique and very selective,
             is part of a thriving research lab while nurturing
             their own novel research ideas. In the third year,   prospective students can be intimidated by the pro-
                                                        gram description and requirements.
             research focus shifts from being adviser-directed to
             being candidate-directed, and fellowship funding is     We have noted that many of our own faculty
             provided through Thayer School in support of the   entrepreneurs are what one might call “adventitious
             candidate’s research agenda.  In addition, in years   entrepreneurs” who did not necessarily pre-medi-
             three through five, the school makes up to $10,000   tate an entrepreneurial role, and that, perhaps, is the
             in supplies and equipment funding available per year   more common story for engineers with advanced
             per student for research activity that is divergent from   degrees. Recognizing this, we expanded the target
             their adviser’s own research and which furthers their   and messaging beyond speaking to students ready
             innovation and enterprise-building endeavors.  for entrepreneurship or bent on commercialization
               Funding to start the program was raised through   to include those that are interested in preparing for
             philanthropy. Grants and fellowships that align with   this opportunity down the road and broadening
             the program’s objectives have been employed as   their future options. This change supports what we
             funding sources. For example, a Luce Foundation  always knew: All engineers will benefit from addi-
             grant has been employed to support development  tional training in business and entrepreneurship. To
             of women through the program, and a National Sci-  cast the net more widely, we have employed highly
             ence Foundation Partnerships for Innovation grant  targeted tactics such as recruiting through alumni
             funded student collaboration with existing small  and faculty networks and from within our own pool
             business enterprises. Thayer’s Energy Challenge Ini-  of existing students, but also broader tactics such as
             tiative has supported students in the field of energy,  posters and Facebook ads to reach Ph.D. prospects at
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50