Page 61 - Technology and Innovation Journal - 19-1
P. 61

EVENT ANALYTICS FOR INNOVATION                         399



             makers at funding agencies, investors, and entrepre-  innovation, particularly innovation outputs. These
             neurs to make decisions that lead to more successful  metrics are needed, the panel concluded, “to assess
             outcomes.                                  the impact of federal, state, and local innovation poli-
                                                        cies, such as the amount and direction of federal R&D
             Current Innovation Metrics and the Need for  funding, support for STEM education at the graduate
             New Measures of Innovation                 level, and regulation of new products and services. In
               In 2011, the Committee on National Statistics and   addition, having good measures of innovation out-
             the Board on Science, Technology, and Economic   put facilitates comparison of the United States with
             Policy of the National Research Council convened   other countries in a key area that promotes economic
             the Panel on Developing Science, Technology, and   growth” (3). The report also listed a selection of real
             Innovation Indicators for the Future and charged the   and relevant policy questions for which new metrics
             members with assessing the current state of inno-  are required to formulate appropriate answers.
             vation metrics and preparing recommendations for
             future measures of STI. The panel’s 2014 report was   Visualization as a Tool for Exploration and
             detailed and extensive in both areas, drawing on both   Understanding
             U.S. and international research (3). The report is    Innovation researchers have used diverse visual-
             intended to provide guidance to the National Center  izations to explore data, derive insights, and present
             for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) at the  results. Traditional visualizations include these data
             U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the study’s  types with example applications from innovation
             sponsor.                                   research (examples in Figure 1):
               NCSES currently produces many statistical     •  Choropleth maps to show intensity of innova-
             measures of innovation inputs, outputs, and long-     tion activity by county, state, etc.
             term outcomes, including metrics for: research and     •  Scatterplots and heat maps
             development (R&D); national R&D expenditures     •  Timelines and hierarchies to show intensity of
             and performance (by type of industry and source of      innovation activity in patent taxonomies
             funds); commercial outputs and outcomes; knowl-
             edge outputs; STEM education; STEM workforce/    •  Networks to show connections among university
                                                           or venture capital firms and start-up companies
             talent; and organizations/institutions (3).
               Traditionally, NCSES and its predecessors have    The emergence of tools for new data types offers
             used surveys, including the Business R&D and Inno-  fresh opportunities for innovation researchers to
             vation Survey, to trace the inputs and outputs of the  understand event patterns that could guide inter-
             innovation system. More recently, alternative data  ventions to increase the success of innovation efforts.
             sources, including administrative and electronic  Current interest in event analytics has been triggered
             transaction records, are increasingly available (3).  by the growth of electronic health records, which now
             Along with these new data sources, widespread and  provide online access to tens of millions of patient
             low cost computing power has made the use of new  histories. These histories reveal patterns of medica-
             analytic methods possible, such as network and tem-  tion compliance, links between treatments and side
             poral analysis. The availability of new tools, including  effects, and the relationship between interventions
             NodeXL (NodeXL: Network Overview, Discovery  and outcomes (4,5).
             and Exploration for Excel https://nodexl.codeplex.    Increasing availability of innovation histories
             com/) for network analysis and EventFlow (Event-  could produce similar benefits by allowing research-
             Flow: Visual Analysis of Temporal Event Sequences  ers for the first time to study the relationships between
             http://hcil.umd.edu/eventflow/) for temporal anal-  events in start-up companies and the eventual suc-
             ysis, can help innovation researchers develop new  cess or failure of those companies. Event analytics
             innovation metrics.                        is a new and growing topic within visual analytics
               The panel was unequivocal on its recommen-  that combines interactive exploration with statisti-
             dation that NCSES should develop new metrics of  cal tools to find expected common trajectories and
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66