Page 112 - leadership-experience-2008
P. 112
CikguOnline
CikguOnline
CHAPTER 3: CONTINGENCY APPROACHES 93
(September 6, 2006), pp. A1, A16; “Matthew Karnitschnig and 20 Dyan Machan, “We’re Not Authoritarian Goons,” Forbes (October
Brooks Barnes, “Does MTV Still Rock? Freston Firing Sparks 24, 1994), pp. 264–268.
Soul-Searching at Network,” The Wall Street Journal (September 21 Jennifer Reingold, “Bob Nardelli Is Watching,” Fast Company
7, 2006), pp. B1, B3; and Bill Carter, “He’s Cool, He Keeps MTV (December 2005), pp. 76–83.
Sizzling, and, Oh Yes, He’s 56,” The New York Times (June 16, 22 Brian Grow, with Dean Foust, Emily Thornton, Roben Farzad,
2002), Section 3, p. 1. Jena McGregor, and Susan, “Out at Home Depot,” Business Week
6 Karnitschnig, “Ouster of Viacom Chief Reflects Redstone’s Impatience.” (January 15, 2007), p. 56ff.
7 M. J. Strube and J. E. Garcia, “A Meta-Analytic Investigation 23 Charles Greene, “Questions of Causation in the Path-Goal
of Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness,” Theory of Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 22
Psychological Bulletin 90 (1981), pp. 307–321; and L. H. Peters, (March 1979), pp. 22–41; and C. A. Schriesheim and Mary Ann
D. D. Hartke, and J. T. Pohlmann, “Fiedler’s Contingency Theory von Glinow, “The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: A Theoretical
of Leadership: An Application of the Meta-Analysis Procedures of and Empirical Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal 20
Schmidt and Hunter,” Psychological Bulletin 97 (1985), pp. 274–285. (1977), pp. 398–405.
8 R. Singh, “Leadership Style and Reward Allocation: Does Least 24 V. H. Vroom and Arthur G. Jago, The New Leadership: Managing
Preferred Coworker Scale Measure Tasks and Relation Orientation?” Participation in Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 27 (1983), 1988).
pp. 178–197; D. Hosking, “A Critical Evaluation of Fiedler’s 25 The following discussion is based heavily on Victor H. Vroom,
Contingency Hypotheses,” Progress in Applied Psychology 1 “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” Organizational
(1981), pp. 103–154; Gary Yukl, “Leader LPC Scores: Attitude Dynamics 28, no. 4 (Spring 2000), pp. 82–94.
Dimensions and Behavioral Correlates,” Journal of Social Psychology 26 R. H. G. Field, “A Test of the Vroom–Yetton Normative Model
80 (1970), pp. 207–212; G. Graen, K. M. Alvares, J. B. Orris, and of Leadership,” Journal of Applied Psychology (October 1982),
J. A. Martella, “Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: pp. 523–532; and R. H. G. Field, “A Critique of the Vroom–
Antecedent and Evidential Results,” Psychological Bulletin 74 (1970), Yetton Contingency Model of Leadership Behavior,” Academy of
pp. 285–296; R. P. Vecchio, “Assessing the Validity of Fiedler’s Management Review 4 (1979), pp. 249–251.
Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: A Closer Look at 27 Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process”; Jennifer
Strube and Garcia,” Psychological Bulletin 93 (1983), pp. 404–408. T. Ettling and Arthur G. Jago, “Participation Under Conditions
9 J. K. Kennedy, Jr., “Middle LPC Leaders and the Contingency of Conflict: More on the Validity of the Vroom–Yetton Model,”
Model of Leadership Effectiveness,” Organizational Behavior and Journal of Management Studies 25 (1988), pp. 73–83; Madeline
Human Performance 30 (1982), pp. 1–14; and S. C. Shiflett, “The E. Heilman, Harvey A. Hornstein, Jack H. Cage, and Judith K.
Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: Some Implications of Herschlag, “Reactions to Prescribed Leader Behavior as a Function
Its Statistical and Methodological Properties,” Behavioral Science 18, of Role Perspective: The Case of the Vroom–Yetton Model,” Journal
no. 6 (1973), pp. 429–440. of Applied Psychology (February 1984), pp. 50–60; and Arthur G.
10 Roya Ayman, M. M. Chemers, and F. Fiedler, “The Contingency Jago and Victor H. Vroom, “Some Differences in the Incidence and
Model of Leadership Effectiveness: Its Levels of Analysis,” Evaluation of Participative Leader Behavior,” Journal of Applied
Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 2 (1995), pp. 147–167. Psychology (December 1982), pp. 776–783.
11 Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard, Management of 28 Based on a decision problem presented in Victor H. Vroom,
Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources, 4th ed. “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” Organizational
(Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982). Dynamics 28, no. 4 (Spring, 2000), pp. 82–94.
12 Jonathan Kaufman, “A McDonald’s Owner Becomes a Role Model 29 S. Kerr and J. M. Jermier, “Substitutes for Leadership: Their
for Black Teenagers,” The Wall Street Journal (August 23, 1995), Meaning and Measurement,” Organizational Behavior and Human
pp. A1, A6. Performance 22 (1978), pp. 375–403; and Jon P. Howell and Peter
13 Michael Barrier, “Leadership Skills Employees Respect,” Nation’s W. Dorfman, “Leadership and Substitutes for Leadership Among
Business (January 1999). Professional and Nonprofessional Workers,” Journal of Applied
14 Cheryl Dahle, “Xtreme Teams,” Fast Company (November 1999), Behavioral Science 22 (1986), pp. 29–46.
pp. 310–326. 30 J. P. Howell, D. E. Bowen, P. W. Doreman, S. Kerr, and P. M. Podsakoff,
15 Carole McGraw, “Teaching Teenagers? Think, Do, Learn,” “Substitutes for Leadership: Effective Alternatives to Ineffective
Education Digest (February 1998), pp. 44–47. Leadership,” Organizational Dynamics (Summer 1990), pp. 21–38.
16 M. G. Evans, “The Effects of Supervisory Behavior on the Path–Goal 31 Howell, et al., “Substitutes for Leadership: Effective Alternatives to
Relationship,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance Ineffective Leadership.”
5 (1970), pp. 277–298; M. G. Evans, “Leadership and Motivation: 32 Robert Tomsho and John Hechinger, “Crimson Blues; Harvard
A Core Concept,” Academy of Management Journal 13 (1970), Clash Pits Brusque Leader Against Faculty,” The Wall Street Journal
pp. 91–102; and B. S. Georgopoulos, G. M. Mahoney, and N. W. (February 18, 2005), pp. A1, A8; and Ruth R. Wisse, “Cross
Jones, “A Path–Goal Approach to Productivity,” Journal of Applied Country; Coup d’Ecole,” The Wall Street Journal (February 23,
Psychology 41 (1957), pp. 345–353. 2006), p. A17.
17 Robert J. House, “A Path–Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness,” 33 P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, and W. H. Bommer,
Administrative Science Quarterly 16 (1971), pp. 321–338. “Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership
18 M. G. Evans, “Leadership,” in Organizational Behavior, ed. S. Kerr as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and
(Columbus, OH: Grid, 1974), pp. 230–233. Organizational Behaviors,” Journal of Management 22, no. 2 (1996),
19 Robert J. House and Terrence R. Mitchell, “Path–Goal Theory of Leader- pp. 259–298.
ship,” Journal of Contemporary Business (Autumn 1974), pp. 81–97. 34 Howell, et al., “Substitutes for Leadership.”

