Page 112 - leadership-experience-2008
P. 112

CikguOnline
         CikguOnline
               CHAPTER 3: CONTINGENCY APPROACHES                                                          93
                  (September 6, 2006), pp. A1, A16; “Matthew Karnitschnig and   20  Dyan Machan, “We’re Not Authoritarian Goons,” Forbes (October
                  Brooks Barnes, “Does MTV Still Rock? Freston Firing Sparks   24, 1994), pp. 264–268.
                  Soul-Searching at Network,” The Wall Street Journal (September   21  Jennifer Reingold, “Bob Nardelli Is Watching,” Fast Company
                  7, 2006), pp. B1, B3; and Bill Carter, “He’s Cool, He Keeps MTV   (December 2005), pp. 76–83.
                  Sizzling, and, Oh Yes, He’s 56,” The New York Times (June 16,   22  Brian Grow, with Dean Foust, Emily Thornton, Roben Farzad,
                  2002), Section 3, p. 1.                        Jena McGregor, and Susan, “Out at Home Depot,” Business Week
               6  Karnitschnig, “Ouster of Viacom Chief Reflects Redstone’s Impatience.”  (January 15, 2007), p. 56ff.
               7  M. J. Strube and J. E. Garcia, “A Meta-Analytic Investigation   23  Charles Greene, “Questions of Causation in the Path-Goal
                  of Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness,”   Theory of Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 22
                  Psychological Bulletin 90 (1981), pp. 307–321; and L. H. Peters,   (March 1979), pp. 22–41; and C. A. Schriesheim and Mary Ann
                  D. D. Hartke, and J. T. Pohlmann, “Fiedler’s Contingency Theory   von Glinow, “The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: A Theoretical
                  of Leadership: An Application of the Meta-Analysis Procedures of   and Empirical Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal 20
                  Schmidt and Hunter,” Psychological Bulletin 97 (1985), pp. 274–285.  (1977), pp. 398–405.
               8  R. Singh, “Leadership Style and Reward Allocation: Does Least   24  V. H. Vroom and Arthur G. Jago, The New Leadership: Managing
                  Preferred Coworker Scale Measure Tasks and Relation Orientation?”   Participation in Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,
                  Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 27 (1983),   1988).
                  pp. 178–197; D. Hosking, “A Critical Evaluation of Fiedler’s   25  The following discussion is based heavily on Victor H. Vroom,
                  Contingency Hypotheses,” Progress in Applied Psychology 1   “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” Organizational
                  (1981), pp. 103–154; Gary Yukl, “Leader LPC Scores: Attitude   Dynamics 28, no. 4 (Spring 2000), pp. 82–94.
                  Dimensions and Behavioral Correlates,” Journal of Social Psychology   26  R. H. G. Field, “A Test of the Vroom–Yetton Normative Model
                  80 (1970), pp. 207–212; G. Graen, K. M. Alvares, J. B. Orris, and   of Leadership,” Journal of Applied Psychology (October 1982),
                  J. A. Martella, “Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness:   pp. 523–532; and R. H. G. Field, “A Critique of the Vroom–
                  Antecedent and Evidential Results,” Psychological Bulletin 74 (1970),   Yetton Contingency Model of Leadership Behavior,” Academy of
                  pp. 285–296; R. P. Vecchio, “Assessing the Validity of Fiedler’s   Management Review 4 (1979), pp. 249–251.
                  Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: A Closer Look at   27  Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process”; Jennifer
                  Strube and Garcia,” Psychological Bulletin 93 (1983), pp. 404–408.  T. Ettling and Arthur G. Jago, “Participation Under Conditions
               9  J. K. Kennedy, Jr., “Middle LPC Leaders and the Contingency   of Conflict: More on the Validity of the Vroom–Yetton Model,”
                  Model of Leadership Effectiveness,” Organizational Behavior and   Journal of Management Studies 25 (1988), pp. 73–83; Madeline
                  Human Performance 30 (1982), pp. 1–14; and S. C. Shiflett, “The   E. Heilman, Harvey A. Hornstein, Jack H. Cage, and Judith K.
                  Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: Some Implications of   Herschlag, “Reactions to Prescribed Leader Behavior as a Function
                  Its Statistical and Methodological Properties,” Behavioral Science 18,   of Role Perspective: The Case of the Vroom–Yetton Model,” Journal
                  no. 6 (1973), pp. 429–440.                     of Applied Psychology (February 1984), pp. 50–60; and Arthur G.
               10   Roya Ayman, M. M. Chemers, and F. Fiedler, “The Contingency   Jago and Victor H. Vroom, “Some Differences in the Incidence and
                  Model of Leadership Effectiveness: Its Levels of Analysis,”   Evaluation of Participative Leader Behavior,” Journal of Applied
                  Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 2 (1995), pp. 147–167.  Psychology (December 1982), pp. 776–783.
               11   Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard, Management of   28  Based on a decision problem presented in Victor H. Vroom,
                  Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources, 4th ed.   “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” Organizational
                  (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982).   Dynamics 28, no. 4 (Spring, 2000), pp. 82–94.
               12   Jonathan Kaufman, “A McDonald’s Owner Becomes a Role Model   29  S. Kerr and J. M. Jermier, “Substitutes for Leadership: Their
                  for Black Teenagers,” The Wall Street Journal (August 23, 1995),   Meaning and Measurement,” Organizational Behavior and Human
                  pp. A1, A6.                                    Performance 22 (1978), pp. 375–403; and Jon P. Howell and Peter
               13   Michael Barrier, “Leadership Skills Employees Respect,” Nation’s   W. Dorfman, “Leadership and Substitutes for Leadership Among
                  Business (January 1999).                       Professional and Nonprofessional Workers,” Journal of Applied
               14  Cheryl Dahle, “Xtreme Teams,” Fast Company (November 1999),   Behavioral Science 22 (1986), pp. 29–46.
                  pp. 310–326.                                 30  J. P. Howell, D. E. Bowen, P. W. Doreman, S. Kerr, and P. M. Podsakoff,
               15  Carole McGraw, “Teaching Teenagers? Think, Do, Learn,”   “Substitutes for Leadership: Effective Alternatives to Ineffective
                  Education Digest (February 1998), pp. 44–47.   Leadership,” Organizational Dynamics (Summer 1990), pp. 21–38.
               16  M. G. Evans, “The Effects of Supervisory Behavior on the Path–Goal   31  Howell, et al., “Substitutes for Leadership: Effective Alternatives to
                  Relationship,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance   Ineffective Leadership.”
                  5 (1970), pp. 277–298; M. G. Evans, “Leadership and Motivation:   32  Robert Tomsho and John Hechinger, “Crimson Blues; Harvard
                  A Core Concept,” Academy of Management Journal 13 (1970),   Clash Pits Brusque Leader Against Faculty,” The Wall Street Journal
                  pp. 91–102; and B. S. Georgopoulos, G. M. Mahoney, and N. W.   (February 18, 2005), pp. A1, A8; and Ruth R. Wisse, “Cross
                  Jones, “A Path–Goal Approach to Productivity,” Journal of Applied   Country; Coup d’Ecole,” The Wall Street Journal (February 23,
                  Psychology 41 (1957), pp. 345–353.             2006), p. A17.
               17   Robert J. House, “A Path–Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness,”   33  P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, and W. H. Bommer,
                  Administrative Science Quarterly 16 (1971), pp. 321–338.  “Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership
               18   M. G. Evans, “Leadership,” in Organizational Behavior, ed. S. Kerr   as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and
                  (Columbus, OH: Grid, 1974), pp. 230–233.       Organizational Behaviors,” Journal of Management 22, no. 2 (1996),
               19  Robert J. House and Terrence R. Mitchell, “Path–Goal Theory of Leader-  pp. 259–298.
                  ship,” Journal of Contemporary Business (Autumn 1974), pp. 81–97.  34  Howell, et al., “Substitutes for Leadership.”
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117