Page 107 - leadership-experience-2008
P. 107

CikguOnline
      CikguOnline
            88                                                                PART 2: RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES ON LEADERSHIP

                                     IN THE LEAD  Lawrence H. Summers, Harvard University
                                       Leading a major university has many challenges, and one of the biggest is choosing
                                       the right approach with deans, faculty members, and other professionals who are
                                       highly educated, independent, and often perform their jobs as much for the intrinsic
                                       satisfaction of the work as for the pay and other extrinsic benefi ts.
                                          As president of Harvard University, former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence
                                       Summers tried to use a heavy, primarily task-oriented style of leadership, which

                                       led to serious conflicts with some faculty members and eventual demands for his
                                       ouster. The assertive top-down style rankled followers who have been accustomed
                                       to thinking of themselves not as employees but as partners in an academic enter-
                                       prise. Faculty members at Harvard, as at many universities, have long been used
                                       to decentralized, democratic decision making, such as having a say in matters such
                                       as department mergers or new programs of study. Summers made many decisions
                                       on his own that followers thought should be put to a faculty vote and then used a
                                       directive style to get things done.
                                          Although students in general supported Summers, the conflicts and a vote of

                                       no-confidence from some faculty convinced Summers to resign with many of his

                                       goals and plans for the university unrealized. There are a variety of reasons for Sum-
                                       mers’ troubles and eventual departure, but his heavy-handed task-oriented approach
                                                      32
                                       likely played a role.
             Action Memo
                                                  Lawrence Summers infuriated some Harvard faculty members
                                              by failing to appreciate the substitutes for leadership concept. In
             As a leader, you can use a people-oriented
                                              this situation, professionalism, education, and intrinsic satisfaction
            style when tasks are highly structured and
                                              make both task- and people-oriented leadership behavior less impor-
            followers are bound by formal rules and
                                             tant. Summers likely would have been more successful using a light-
            procedures. You can adopt a task-oriented
                                             handed, primarily people-oriented style.
           style if group cohesiveness and followers’
                                                Recent studies have examined how substitutes (the situation) can
           intrinsic job satisfaction meet their social
          and emotional needs.
                                            be designed to have more impact than leader behaviors on outcomes
                                           such as subordinate satisfaction.  The impetus behind this research is the
                                                                      33
                                           idea that substitutes for leadership can be designed into organizations in
                                           ways to complement existing leadership, act in the absence of leadership,
                                   and otherwise provide more comprehensive leadership alternatives. For example,
                                          Paul Reeves, a foreman at Harmon Auto Parts, shared half-days with his
                                               subordinates during which they helped him perform his leader tasks.
             Action Memo
                                               After Reeves’ promotion to middle management, his group no lon-
                                              ger required a foreman. Followers were trained to act on their own. 34
             As a leader, you can provide minimal
                                              Thus, a situation in which follower ability and training were highly
            task direction and personal support to
                                             developed created a substitute for leadership.
            highly-trained employees; followers’
                                                 The ability to utilize substitutes to fill leadership “gaps” is often

            professionalism and intrinsic satisfaction
                                             advantageous to organizations. Indeed, the fundamental assumption
           substitute for both task- and people-
           oriented leadership.
                                            of substitutes-for-leadership researchers is that effective leadership
                                            is the ability to recognize and provide the support and direction not
                                             already provided by task, group, and organization.
                                   Summary and Interpretation
                                   The most important point in this chapter is that situational variables affect lead-
                                   ership outcomes. The contingency approaches were developed to systematically
                                   address the relationship between a leader and the organization. The contingency
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112