Page 291 - alligood 8th edition_Neat

272 UNIT III Nursing Conceptual Models

Goodwin, Z., Kiehl, E. M., & Peterson, J. Z. (2002). King’s Killeen, M. B. (2007). Development and initial testing of
theory as foundation for an advance directive decision- a theory of patient satisfaction with nursing care. In
making model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 15(3), 237–241. C. L. Sieloff & M. A. Frey (Eds.). Middle range theory
Gulitz, E., & King, I. (1988). King’s general system model: development using King’s conceptual system (pp. 138–163).
Application to curriculum development. Nursing Science New York: Springer.
Quarterly 3(2), 128–132. Killeen, M. B., & King, I. M. (2007). Use of King’s concep-
Harih, M., & Pajnkihar, M. (2009). Application of tual system, nursing informatics, and nursing classifica-
Imogene M. King’s nursing model in the treatment tion systems for global communication. International
of elderly diabetes patients. Slovenian Nursing Review, Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications,
43(3), 201–208. 18(2), 51–57.
Houser, B. P., & Player, K. N. (2007). Imogene King. In King, I. M. (1968). A conceptual frame of reference for
Pivotal Moments in Nursing (Vol. 2). Sigma Theta Tau nursing. Nursing Research, 17(1), 27–31.
International. Indianapolis, (IN), 106–131. King, I. M. (1971). Toward a theory for nursing: General
Ittleson, W., & Cantril, H. (1954). Perception: A transac- concepts of human behavior. New York: Wiley.
tional approach. Garden City, (NY): Doubleday. King, I. M. (1975a). A process for developing concepts for
Jersild, A. T. (1952). In search of self. New York: Teachers nursing through research. In P. Verhonick (Ed.), Nursing
College Press. research. Boston: Little, Brown.
Jewell, D. A. (2007). Perceptions of dyspnea, physical activ- King, I. M. (1975b). Patient aspects. In L. J. Schumann, R.
ity, and functional status in obese women. (University of D. Spears, Jr., & J. P. Young (Eds.), Operations research in
Missouri—Saint Louis). ProQuest Dissertations and health care: A critical analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
Theses. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/doc University.
view/304762313?accountid528148. King, I. M. (1977). Knowledge development in nursing: A
Jolly, M. L., & Winker, C. K. (1995). Theory of goal at- process. In I. M. King, & J. Fawcett (Eds.). The language of
tainment in the context of organizational structure. nursing theory and metatheory.(pp. 19–25). Indianapolis:
In M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King’s Sigma Theta Tau International.
systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 305–316). King, I. M. (Speaker). (1978). Speech presented at 2nd An-
Thousand Oaks, (CA): Sage. nual Nurse Educators’ Conference. Chicago: Teach ‘Em.
Jones-Zeigler, C. (2011). Computerization in practice: The King, I. M. (1981). A theory for nursing: Systems, concepts,
lived experience of experienced nurses. (Capella Univer- process. New York: Wiley.
sity). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved King, I. M. (1984). Effectiveness of nursing care: Use of a
from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/908437918? goal oriented nursing record in end stage renal disease.
accountid528148 American Association of Nephrology Nurses and Techni-
Kameoka, T., Funashima, N., & Sugimori, M. (2007). If cians Journal, 11(2), 11–17, 60.
goals are attained, satisfaction will occur in nurse-patient King, I. M. (1986). Curriculum and instruction in nursing:
interaction: An empirical test. In C. L. Sieloff & M. A. Concepts and process. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-
Frey (Eds.). Middle range theory development using King’s Crofts.
conceptual system (pp. 261–272). New York: Springer. King, I. M. (1988). Measuring health goal attainment in
Karlin, J. L. (2011). King’s theory of goal attainment: The patients. In C. F. Waltz & O. L. Strickland (Eds.), Mea-
intrapartum nurse’s perspective. (Master’s clinical pa- surement of nursing outcomes Volume one: Measuring
per). Retrieved from OCLC FirstSearch database. client outcomes (pp. 109–127). New York: Springer.
(Accession No.745472545). King, I. M. (1995a). A systems framework for nursing. In
Kelley, K. J., & Hammond, K. R. (1964). An approach to M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King’s
the study of clinical inference. Nursing Research, 13(4), systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 14–22).
314–322. Thousand Oaks, (CA): Sage.
Khowaja, D. (2006). Utilization of King’s interacting systems King, I. M. (1995b). The theory of goal attainment. In
framework and theory of goal attainment with new mul- M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King’s
tidisciplinary model: Clinical pathway. Australian Journal systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 23–32).
of Advanced Nursing, 24(2), 44–50. Thousand Oaks, (CA): Sage.
Killeen, M. B. (1996). Patient-consumer perceptions and re- King, I. M. (2000). Evidence-based nursing practice. Theoria:
sponses to professional nursing care: Instrument develop- Journal of Nursing Theory, 9(2), 4–9.
ment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State King, I. M. (2003).Assessment of functional abilities and
University, Detroit. goal attainment scales: A criterion- reference measure.