Page 286 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 286

CHAPTER 15  Imogene M. King  267

           Goodwin, Kiehl, and Peterson (2002). Fairfax (2007)   In 2007, Sieloff and Frey reported the status of
           derived a theory of quality of life of stroke survivors.   middle-range  theory  development  from  within
           Nwinee  (2011)  used  King’s  work  to  develop  the   King’s conceptual system. Fawcett (2007) again ex-
           Nwinee  Socio-Behavioral  Self-Care  Management   amined  the  development  of  middle-range  theory,
           Nurse Model.                                  from  within  King’s  conceptual  system,  and  made
             Maloni  (2007)  examined  a  cognitive  interactive   recommendations:
           nursing  intervention  and  health  outcomes  with  pa-    a)  The  credibility  of  King’s  conceptual  system
           tients with type 2 diabetes. Ritter (2008) studied bene-  could  be  further  supported  through  “a  meta-
           fits from participation by academically at-risk students   analysis  or  other  integrative  review  of  the  re-
           in  a  mentor/tutor  program.  Sivaramalingam  (2008)   sults  obtained  from  empirical  tests  of . . . the
           studied perceptions of surgical nurses held by surgical   middle  range  theory  propositions”  (Fawcett,
           patients.  Stevens  (2009)  examined  the  relationships   2007, p. 301).
           among  structural  empowerment,  collaboration  with     b)  “Additional metatheoretical research is needed
           physicians and team work, and patient safety culture.   to  specify  the  relations  between  the  concepts
           Alligood  (2010)  examined  exemplars  of  King-based   within  the  personal,  interpersonal,  and  social
           research  in  family  health  care.  Bond  and  colleagues   systems” (Fawcett, 2007, p. 301).
           (2011) conducted a “univariate descriptive analysis of     c)  Continued empirical testing of all middle-range
           five years’ research articles” (p. 404).           theories is also needed.
                                                           d)  Additional  research  instruments  need  to  be
                                                              developed  to  measure  middle-range  theory
            Further Development                               concepts. The utility of those instruments then
           Over  the  years,  King  consistently  demonstrated  her   needs to be evaluated in terms of their utility
           belief in the need for further testing of the Theory of   for practice (Fawcett, 2007).
           Goal  Attainment.  “Any  profession  that  has  as  its  pri-  Graduate  students  continue  to  use  King’s  con-
           mary  mission  the  delivery  of  social  services  requires   ceptual system and Theory of Goal Attainment for
           continuous  research  to  discover  new  knowledge  that   their research, including thirteen master’s students
           can be applied to improve practice” (King, 1971, p. 112).  (Zimmerman,  2007;  Bialachowski,  2008;  Ritter,
             In 1995, Fawcett and Whall identified five major   2008; Sivaramalingam, 2008; Talbert, 2008; Egbert,
           areas  in  which  further  development  of  King’s  work   2009; Weg, 2009; Boyd-Jones, 2011; Colchin, 2011;
           would be helpful:                             Draaistra,  2011;  Karlin,  2011;  Mardis,  2007;  Wolf,
             1.  The  concept  of  environment  would  benefit  from   2011)  and  fifteen  DNP  or  PhD  doctoral  students
             additional definition and clarification.    (Jewell,  2007;  Maloni,  2007;  Crump,  2008;  Woo,
            2.  King’s views of illness, health, and wellness would   2008;  Bularzik,  2009;  Davidson,  2009;  Esquibel,
             benefit from additional clarification and discussion.  2009; Stevens, 2009; Taha, 2009; Aboshaiqah, 2010;
             3.  Future linkages between King’s (1981) conceptual   Smithgall, 2010; Talbott, 2010; Jones-Zeigler, 2011;
             system and other existing middle-range theories   Lewis, 2011; Reck, 2011).
             should  continue  in  a  manner  that  ensures  con-
             gruency between the conceptual system and the   Critique
             specific middle-range theory.
            4.  Empirical testing should continue for the Theory of   Clarity
             Goal Attainment (King, 1981) and other middle-  A major strong point of King’s conceptual system and
             range theories developed within King’s conceptual   Theory of Goal Attainment is the ease with which it
             system  (Fawcett  &  Whall,  1995)  (e.g.,  Sieloff  &   can be understood by nurses. Concepts are concretely
             Dunn, 2008; Sieloff, & Bularzik 2011).      defined and illustrated.
             5.  Middle-range theories that are implied rather than
             explicit,  such  as  those  of  Rooke  (1995b),  would   Simplicity
             benefit  from  development  into  formal  theories   King’s definitions are clear and are conceptually de-
             (e.g., Nwinee, 2011).                       rived from research literature. King’s (1978) Theory of
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291