Page 296 - alligood 8th edition_Neat

CHAPTER 15 Imogene M. King 277

and M. R. Alligood (Eds.), Nursing theorists and their Campbell-Begg, T. (2000). A case study using animal-
work (4th ed.) (pp. 300–319). St. Louis: Mosby. assisted therapy to promote abstinence in a group of
Sieloff, C. L., (2002). Imogene King: Systems framework individuals who are recovering from chemical addic-
and theory of goal attainment. In A. Marriner-Tomey tions. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 12(1), 31–35.
and M. R. Alligood (Eds.), Nursing theorists and their Caris-Verhallen, W. M., Kerkstra, A., van der Heijden,
work (5th ed.) (pp. 336–360). St. Louis: Mosby. P. G., & Bensing, J. M. (1998). Nurse-elderly patient
Sieloff, C. L., (2006). Imogene King: Systems framework communication in home care and institutional care:
and theory of goal attainment. In A. Marriner-Tomey An explorative study. International Journal of Nursing
and M. R. Alligood (Eds.), Nursing theorists and their Studies, 35(1–2), 95–108.
work (6th ed.) (pp. 336–360). St. Louis: Mosby. Carter, K. F., & Dufour, L. T. (1994). King’s theory: A cri-
Sieloff, C. L., Frey, M., & Killeen, M. (2001). Application of tique of the critiques. Nursing Science Quarterly, 7(3),
King’s interacting systems framework. In M. Parker 128–133.
(Ed.), Nursing theorists and their application in practice. Crossan, F., & Robb, A. (1998). Role of the nurse: Intro-
Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. ducing theories and concepts. British Journal of Nurs-
Sieloff, C. L., Frey, M., & Killeen, M. (2006). Application of ing, 7(10), 608–612.
King’s Interacting Systems Framework. In M. Parker Daniel, J. M. (2002). Young adults’ perceptions of living
(Ed.), Nursing theorists and their application in practice with chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenter-
(2nd ed., pp. 244–267). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. ology Nursing, 25(3), 83–94.
Whelton, B. J. B. (2007). The nursing act is an excellent hu- David, G. L. B. (2000). Ethics in the relationship between
man act: A philosophical analysis derived from classi- nursing and AIDS-afflicted families [Portuguese]. Texto
cal philosophy and the conceptual system and theory of & Contexto Enfermagem, 9(2), 590–599.
Imogene King. In C. L. Sieloff & M. A. Frey (Eds.). Doornbos, M. M. (2000). King’s systems framework and
Middle range theory development using King’s conceptual family health: The derivation and testing of a theory.
system (pp. 12–28). New York: Springer. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 4(1), 20–26.
Wicks, M. N. (1995). Family health as derived from King’s Doornbos, M. M. (2002). Predicting family health in fami-
framework. In M. A. Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Ad- lies with young adults with severe mental illness. Jour-
vancing King’s systems framework and theory of nursing nal of Family Nursing, 8(3), 241–263.
(pp. 97–108). Thousand Oaks, (CA): Sage. Fawcett, J. (2001). Scholarly dialogue. The nurse theorists:
Winker, C. K. (1995). A systems view of health. In M. A. 21st-century updates—Imogene M. King. Nursing Sci-
Frey & C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King’s systems ence Quarterly, 14(4), 311–315.
framework and theory of nursing (pp. 35–45). Thousand Frey, M. A. (1996). Behavioral correlates of health and ill-
Oaks, (CA): Sage. ness in youths with chronic illness. Advanced Nursing
Zurakowski, T. L. (2007). Theory of social and interper- Research, 9(4), 167–176.
sonal influences on health. In C. L. Sieloff & M. A. Frey Frey, M. A. (1997). Health promotion in youth with
(Eds.). Middle range theory development using King’s chronic illness: Are we on the right track? Quality
conceptual system (pp. 237–257). New York: Springer. Nursing, 3(5), 13–18.
Frey, M., Rooke. L. Sieloff, C, Messmer, P., Kameoka, T.
Journal Articles (1995). Implementing King’s conceptual framework
Alligood, M. R., & May, B. A. (2000). A nursing theory of and theory of goal attainment in Japan, Sweden and
personal system empathy: Interpreting a conceptualiza- United States. Image 27(2), 127–130.
tion of empathy in King’s interacting systems. Nursing Gill, J., Hopwood-Jones, L., Tyndall, J., Gregoroff, S.,
Science Quarterly, 13(3), 243–247. LeBlanc, P., Lovett, C., et al. (1995). Incorporating
Baumann, S. L. (2000). Research issues: Family nursing: nursing diagnosis and King’s theory in the O. R. docu-
Theory-anemic, nursing theory-deprived. Nursing Sci- mentation. Canadian Operating Room Nursing Journal,
ence Quarterly, 13(4), 285–290. 13(1), 10–14.
Brooks, E. M., & Thomas, S. (1997). The perception and Hanucharurnkui, S., & Vinya-nguag, P. (1991). Effects of
judgment of senior baccalaureate student nurses in promoting patients’ participation in self-care on post-
clinical decision making. Advances in Nursing Science, operative recovery and satisfaction with care. Nursing
19(3), 50–69. Science Quarterly, 4(1), 14–20.
Calladine, M. L. (1996). Nursing process for health promo- Husting, P. M. (1997). A transcultural critique of Imogene
tion using King’s theory. Journal of Community Health King’s theory of goal attainment. Journal of Multicul-
Nursing, 13(1), 51–57. tural Nursing & Health, 3(3), 15–20.