Page 294 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 294

CHAPTER 15  Imogene M. King  275

           Woo, T. M. (2008). Weight bias in pediatric healthcare pro-  Zimmerman, B. I. (2007). Comparing functional and team
             viders: An exploratory study using photo elicitation with   nursing models of care delivery on patient outcomes.
             focus groups. (University of Colorado Health Sciences   (Mountain State University). ProQuest Dissertations
             Center). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved   and Theses. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.
             from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/304341650?  com/docview/194014958?accountid528148.
             accountid528148.
           Yura, H., & Walsh, M. (1978). The nursing process.
             New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.


            BIBLIOGRAPHY
           Additional Primary Sources                    King, I. M. (1997). Reflections on the past and a vision for
           Books                                           the future. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10(1), 15–17.
           Fawcett, J., & King, I. (Eds.). (1997). The language of nurs-  King, I. M. (1998). Nursing informatics: A universal nurs-
             ing theory and metatheory. Indianapolis: Sigma Theta   ing language. Florida Nurse, 46(1), 1–3, 5, 9.
             Tau International.                          King, I. M. (1998). The Bioethics Focus Group Report.
           King, I. M. (1964). Nursing theory: Problems and pros-  Florida Nurse, 46(8), 24.
             pects. Nursing Science, 1(3), 394–403.      King, I. M. (1999). A theory of goal attainment: Philo-
           King, I. M. (1976). Toward a theory of nursing: General   sophical and ethical implications. Nursing Science
             concepts of human behavior (Sugimori, M., Trans.).   Quarterly, 12(4), 292–296.
             Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin.                         King, I. M. (2000). Evidence-based nursing practice. Theo-
           King, I. M. (1985). A theory for nursing: Systems, concepts,   ria: Journal of Nursing Theory, 9(2), 4–9.
             process (Sugimori, M., Trans.). Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin.  Quigley, P., Janzen, S. K., King, I, M., & Goucher, E.
           King, I. M., & Fawcett, J. (1997). The language of nursing   (1999). Nurse staffing patient outcomes from one acute
             theory and metatheory. Indianapolis: Sigma Theta Tau   care setting within the Department of Veteran’s Affairs.
             International.                                Florida Nurse, 47(2), 34.
           Additional Book Chapters                      Secondary Sources
           King, I. M. (2007). King’s structure, process and outcomes   Books
             in the 21st century. In C. L. Sieloff & M. A. Frey (Eds.).   Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (1995). Theory and nursing:
             Middle range theory development using King’s conceptual   A systematic approach (3rd ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
             system (pp. 12–28). New York: Springer.     Fitzpatrick, J. J., & Whall, A. L. (1995). Conceptual models
                                                           of nursing: Analysis and application.Bowie, MD: Robert
           Journal Articles                                J. Brady.
           Daubenmire, M. J., & King, I. M. (1973). Nursing process   George, J. B. (1995). Nursing theories: The base for professional
             models: A systems approach. Nursing Outlook, 21(8),   nursing practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
             512–517.                                    Polit, D., & Hungler, B. (1995). Nursing research: Principles
           King, I. M. (1964). Nursing theory—Problems and prospect.   and methods (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
             Nursing Science, 2(5), 394–403.             Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (1995). Strategies for theory
           King, I. M. (1970). A conceptual frame of reference for nurs-  construction in nursing. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-
             ing. Japanese Journal of Nursing Research, 3, 199–204.  Crofts.
           King, I. M. (1987). Translating nursing research into prac-
             tice. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 19(1), 44–48.  Book Chapters
           King, I. M. (1990). Health as the goal for nursing. Nursing   Alligood, M. R. (1995). Theory of goal attainment: Appli-
             Science Quarterly, 3(3), 123–128.             cation to adult orthopedic nursing. In M. A. Frey &
           King, I. M. (1992). King’s theory of goal attainment. Nursing   C. L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King’s systems framework
             Science Quarterly, 5(1), 19–26.               and theory of nursing (pp. 209–222). Thousand Oaks,
           King, I. M. (1994). Quality of life and goal attainment.   (CA): Sage.
             Nursing Science Quarterly, 7(1), 29–32.     Alligood, M. R. (2007). Rethinking empathy in nursing
           King, I. M. (1996). The theory of goal attainment in research   education: Shifting to a developmental view. In C. L.
             and practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 9(2), 61–66.  Sieloff & M. A. Frey (Eds.). Middle range theory devel-
           King, I. M. (1997). King’s theory of goal attainment in   opment using King’s conceptual system (pp. 287–296).
             practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 70(4), 180–185.  New York: Springer.
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299